Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Stocks

Do You Believe In Equal-Weighted ETFs? Really?

by September 14, 2022
September 14, 2022
Do You Believe In Equal-Weighted ETFs?  Really?

One of my favorite intermarket relationships exist between consumer discretionary (XLY) and consumer staples (XLP). It’s a very quick way to see whether the stock market favors offense or defense. If the XLY:XLP ratio is rising, it’s a signal to me that Wall Street believes prices are going higher. The opposite is true when the XLP is leading. If we use the correlation coefficient, we’ll see just how solid this ratio can be:

Correlation spends plenty of time between +0.5 and +1.0, which is very strong positive correlation. Meanwhile, look at how often the XLY:XLP ratio shows inverse correlation in the -0.5 to -1.0 area. Essentially, zero times during the 10 years of this secular bull market. It should be fairly clear based on this visual that the XLY:XLP ratio is tightly and positively correlated with the S&P 500.

I’ve had many traders say that using the XLY isn’t representative because Amazon.com (AMZN) and Tesla (TSLA) are so heavily weighted. Their argument is that this isn’t a “true” measure. Really? So it makes more sense to equally weight companies that are “gnats” compared to these two “800-lb gorillas”?

Here are a few numbers to consider:

TSLA:

Revenue (trailing 12 mos): $67 billionQuarterly Revenue growth: 41.60%EBITDA: $14 billionQuarterly Earnings growth (year over year): 97.80%Full-time employees: 99,290

AMZN:

Revenue (trailing 12 mos): $486 billionQuarterly Revenue growth: 7.20%EBITDA: $52.6 billionQuarterly Earnings growth (year over year): N/AFull-time employees: 1,523,000

These two companies are EXTREMELY important to our economy. They are two of the most visible discretionary companies and weakness in either (or both) of them would be a devastating blow to consumer discretionary, the S&P 500, the NASDAQ, and to our economy.

Now let’s pick two other random consumer discretionary companies from the small cap list:

Tuesday Morning Corp (TUES):

Revenue (trailing 12 mos): $765 millionQuarterly Revenue growth: 4.10%EBITDA: -$21.4 millionQuarterly Earnings growth (year over year): N/AFull-time employees: 1,607

Zovio Inc. (ZVO):

Revenue (trailing 12 mos): $230 millionQuarterly Revenue growth: -25.70%EBITDA: -$38.4 millionQuarterly Earnings growth (year over year): N/AFull-time employees: 1,365

So let me ask you this question. How many of you check the charts of TUES and ZVO when you’re evaluating the strength of the stock market? Well, if you cling to the equal-weight theory, you are saying that the prospects and performance of TUES and ZVO are just as important as TSLA and AMZN. How crazy ridiculous is this? The last time I checked, the S&P 500 is market-cap weighted, as is the NASDAQ. What relevance does the equal-weighted version of the XLY:XLP have?

The equal-weighted version, by the way, is RCD:RHS. Let’s check out this chart and see how it’s performed over the past 10 years.

The overall short-term correlation here is mostly positive (though not as positive as the XLY:XLP) because we have 20-week look-back periods. But if you’re waiting for the RCD:RHS ratio to break out to highs above the 2014 high, you’d have been waiting a long, long time. And guess what happened when it finally did break out? The S&P 500 fell apart.

I’ve had many tell me that the XLY:XLP ratio isn’t a good signal to evaluate the health of the stock market, yet it continues to print higher highs and higher lows – just like the S&P 500. In the meantime, how have those RCD:RHS signals (no breakout confirmation) worked out? It had never broken out (until 2021), never confirming the 10-year secular bull market advance. If you’re waiting for strength in this RCD:RHS ratio to validate the bull market, I wish you the best of luck.

Give me trading liberty (TSLA and AMZN), or give me investing death (breadth).

If you’re interested in joining our FREE EB Digest newsletter (no credit card required), CLICK HERE.

Happy trading!

Tom

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The Deception of Average
next post
5 Incredible Ways you Can Wear a Hoodie

You may also like

Technology Resets PPO, Now Rolling; Fed Should Pause

March 16, 2023

MEM TV: How Much Lower Can the Markets...

October 14, 2022

GNG TV: Markets Try to Rally Into End...

December 8, 2022

DP Trading Room: ETFs vs. Indexes

March 20, 2023

Will This Major Support Level Hold?

December 19, 2022

The Top Five Charts of 2023

December 23, 2023

The Wisdom of Livermore, Part 1

April 5, 2023

The Best Five Sectors, #5

January 31, 2025

Week Ahead: Markets May Step Into The New...

December 31, 2022

Is Cannabis Finally Low Enough to Go High?

June 21, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Kash Patel torches ‘conspiracy theories’ about Bondi feud amid MAGA furor over Epstein files

      July 13, 2025
    • Trump defends embattled AG Pam Bondi, says ‘nobody cares about’ Jeffrey Epstein

      July 12, 2025
    • Bondi says all charges against doctor who allegedly destroyed COVID vaccines have been dropped

      July 12, 2025
    • Meet ‘China’s man in Lima’ who jetted over to US to collect trains donated by Biden admin

      July 12, 2025
    • Inside Dan Bongino’s tense meeting with White House officials over Jeffrey Epstein fallout

      July 12, 2025
    • Could Butler happen again? Former Secret Service agents weigh in on political violence in 2025

      July 12, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,456)
    • Investing (2,118)
    • Politics (16,018)
    • Stocks (3,205)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved