Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

HUGE First Amendment Win For Texas, Ken Paxton and All Americans!

by September 17, 2022
September 17, 2022
HUGE First Amendment Win For Texas, Ken Paxton and All Americans!

Today in Federal Court, Attorney General Ken Paxton and the American people scored a huge victory regarding censorship and banning of individuals based on their viewpoint.  The Gateway Pundit is also involved in a free speech lawsuit of their own in Missouri v. Biden.  This victory from AG Paxton will certainly help TGP’s case moving forward.

 

BREAKING: I just secured a MASSIVE VICTORY for the Constitution & Free Speech in fed court: #BigTech CANNOT censor the political voices of ANY Texan! The 5th Circuit “reject[s] the idea that corporations have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say. pic.twitter.com/UijlzYcv7r

— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) September 16, 2022

The case before the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was regarding House Bill 20, which “generally prohibits large social media platforms from censoring people based on the viewpoint of its speaker.”  Judge Andrew S. Oldham opined that while “the platforms urge us to hold that the statute is facially unconstitutional and hence cannot be applied to anyone at any time under any circumstances,”…”today, we reject the idea that corporations have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say.”

This opinion could have massive implications both in the social media sphere, and beyond, such as the NFL players banned from wearing a Thin Blue Line Flag on their helmet after 5 police officers were killed in Dallas, TX in 2016.  Florida, last year, passed a similar bill that would stop social media platforms from de-platforming individuals, especially those in the media and candidates for political office.  The bill was ultimately stopped from being implemented by Judge Robert Hinkle of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida.  In this case, Judge Hinkle said:

“The legislation compels providers to host speech that violates their standards — speech they otherwise would not host — and forbids providers from speaking as they otherwise would.”

This is a major victory in an ongoing battle over censorship and protections afforded to these tech oligarchs via Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act.  The lopsided bill offers liability protections for the “providers” but no reciprocation to the People to ensure that they aren’t discriminated against based on personal ideologies, despite the bill stating that “the Internet and other interactive computer services offer a forum for a true diversity of political discourse, unique opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual activity.”

Judge Oldham touches on this concept in his opinion:

“The implications of the platforms’ argument are staggering.  On the platforms’ view, email providers, mobile phone companies, and banks could  cancel the accounts of anyone who sends an email, makes a phone call, or spends money in support of a disfavored political party, candidate, or business.  What’s worse, the platforms argue that a business can acquire a dominant market position by holding itself out as open to everyone – as Twitter did in championing itself as “the free speech wing of the free speech party.”  Then, having cemented itself as the monopolist of “the modern public square”, Twitter unapologetically argues that it could turn and ban all pro-LGBT speech for no other reason than its employees want to pick on members of that community.”

Social media has become the new “town hall” of the modern world.  To give these companies protections from being sued for something a user said while allowing them free reign to determine what they will allow people to publish is an utter failure by our legislature to protect the interests of the People over those of corporations.  We saw in the 2020 election how this unchecked power to censor free speech was used against conservatives and President Donald Trump by covering up the New York Post’s story about the Hunter Biden laptop.  We saw it personally at The Gateway Pundit numerous times, but most recently when a reader reached out to tell us our recent article about ballot harvesting in Tarrant Co, TX was mysteriously deleted from her original Tweet:

Justice Clarence Thomas has implied that social media platforms need to be treated as “common carriers”, much like your cell phone.  This may be exactly the case that Justice Thomas was looking for when he said:

“Also unprecedented, however, is the concentrated control of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties. We will soon have no choice but to address how our legal doctrines apply to highly concentrated, privately owned information infrastructure such as digital platforms.”

I’m sure the conservative Supreme Court will get an opportunity to chime in on this one.  In the meantime, this a huge victory for Texan and Americans!

 

Hat Tip Jennifer!

The post HUGE First Amendment Win For Texas, Ken Paxton and All Americans! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
MSNBC Says Illegal Aliens “Are Actually Thanking Governor Ron DeSantis For Having Brought Them to Martha’s Vineyard” (VIDEO)
next post
It’s Not a Stock Market, It’s a Market of Stocks

You may also like

China’s influence on Panama Canal poses ‘acute risks...

January 28, 2025

Matt Tyrmand Shows More Massive Crowds in Brazil...

November 3, 2022

GO TIME? Military Deploy in Brazil – “Martial...

December 3, 2022

Amal Clooney, the ICC’s shame and the real...

May 23, 2024

THE FIX IS IN: Democrat John Fetterman Tells...

November 7, 2022

Lindsey Graham vows to ‘undo’ ‘absurd’ bipartisan debt...

May 30, 2023

“Unlike Nancy Pelosi’s Daughter Who Celebrated My Assault,...

October 29, 2022

Gunfire breaks out at Trump rally in Pennsylvania;...

July 14, 2024

Decisions in 14th Amendment cases could impact pending...

November 12, 2023

MSNBC Reporter Stumps Karine Jean-Pierre: Why is the...

October 30, 2022

China’s influence on Panama Canal poses ‘acute risks...

January 28, 2025

Matt Tyrmand Shows More Massive Crowds in Brazil...

November 3, 2022

GO TIME? Military Deploy in Brazil – “Martial...

December 3, 2022

Amal Clooney, the ICC’s shame and the real...

May 23, 2024

THE FIX IS IN: Democrat John Fetterman Tells...

November 7, 2022

Lindsey Graham vows to ‘undo’ ‘absurd’ bipartisan debt...

May 30, 2023

“Unlike Nancy Pelosi’s Daughter Who Celebrated My Assault,...

October 29, 2022

Gunfire breaks out at Trump rally in Pennsylvania;...

July 14, 2024

Decisions in 14th Amendment cases could impact pending...

November 12, 2023

MSNBC Reporter Stumps Karine Jean-Pierre: Why is the...

October 30, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • My Expert Midwife raises £1.6m to fuel next stage of growth and retail expansion

      July 15, 2025
    • New EV discount scheme offers up to £3,750 off electric cars under £37,000

      July 15, 2025
    • Fear of return-to-office mandates harming employee wellbeing, survey finds

      July 15, 2025
    • America has the power to lead the AI revolution – and the leadership to make it happen

      July 15, 2025
    • Bitcoin hits new high as Trump’s ‘crypto week’ kicks off

      July 15, 2025
    • Trump’s tariff threat would ‘cripple’ transatlantic trade, says EU negotiator as Brussels readies €72bn retaliation

      July 15, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,480)
    • Investing (2,121)
    • Politics (16,037)
    • Stocks (3,209)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved