Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Swiss court orders Lidl chocolate bunnies to be melted as premium sweet brand Lindt win case that they were too similar to their own products

by September 30, 2022
September 30, 2022
Swiss court orders Lidl chocolate bunnies to be melted as premium sweet brand Lindt win case that they were too similar to their own products

Thousands of bunnies will be incinerated after luxury Swiss chocolate maker Lindt won a court case against Lidl.

The Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland ruled that Lidl’s chocolate bunnies wrapped in aluminium foil, whether ‘golden or of another colour’, were too similar to Lindt’s.

It banned the chain’s Swiss branches Lidl Schweiz and Lidl Schweiz DL from selling similar bunnies and ordered the destruction of any still in stock.

Lindt & Sprungli sued in 2018, claiming that Lidl’s bunnies had a very similar shape and appearance and could be confused with its flagship Easter product.

But the commercial court of Switzerland’s Aargau canton, west of Zurich, dismissed Lindt’s action in 2021.

Switzerland’s highest court found the shape of the bunnies was ‘associated by a very large part of the public with Lindt’.

However, Switzerland’s highest court overturned the decision, finding that Lidl’s bunnies posed ‘a risk of confusion even if the two products present certain differences’.

‘Given the overall impression produced, Lidl’s bunnies arouse obvious associations with the shape of Lindt’s,’ the federal court said.

‘In the public mind, they cannot be distinguished.’

Lindt provided consumer surveys showing that its bunny had achieved a level of general public awareness.

The Federal Supreme Court decided that it ‘can be considered common knowledge that the shapes that Lindt & Sprungli has had protected by trademark law are associated by a very large part of the public with the Lindt & Sprungli company’.

Contacted by AFP, Lidl said it could not provide ‘any information concerning legal proceedings which are still ongoing’.

It comes after the hotly contested court case between Marks and Spencer’s and Aldi was finally settled earlier this year in a confidential deal.

The British retailer had accused the German discounter of copying the design of its famous Colin the Caterpillar for their rival Cuthbert.

Lawyers had been brought in on the intellectual property claim, which even made it to the High Court last year.

Both supermarkets confirmed in February that an agreement has been struck to resolve the conflict.

Details of the ‘confidential’ deal have not been revealed, but it is understood that Cuthbert will not appear again in quite the same form.

Read more:
Swiss court orders Lidl chocolate bunnies to be melted as premium sweet brand Lindt win case that they were too similar to their own products

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
HMRC urged to increase car mileage allowances
next post
Interview with Zenity CEO & Co-Founder, Ben Kliger

You may also like

Top 4 sites to get free Instagram followers

December 18, 2023

Hospitality hit as consumers cut back

September 23, 2022

‘EV Health Checker’ creator ClearWatt reaches £200,000 fundraising...

May 22, 2024

Millions of people not working is ‘unacceptable’ says...

July 11, 2024

Airbus finalises deal for Spirit plants in Belfast...

April 29, 2025

One in four UK business-owners have fast tracked...

June 7, 2023

Asos, Boohoo and George promise to be ‘clear...

March 27, 2024

The lonely road to success

February 19, 2024

FundOnion targets £1 billion funding goal in bid...

April 18, 2024

An end could be in sight to rail...

December 16, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • RFK Jr’s HHS to end routine COVID vaccine guidance for children, pregnant women: report

      May 16, 2025
    • State Department confirms ‘constructive’ nuclear talks with Iran; Trump says deal ‘sort of’ agreed to

      May 15, 2025
    • GOP rebel mutiny threatens to derail Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ before key committee hurdle

      May 15, 2025
    • What Sector Rotation Says About the Market Cycle Right Now

      May 15, 2025
    • US Withdrawal from the World Trade Organization Would Be an Epic Mistake

      May 15, 2025
    • Rubio doubts ‘anything productive’ will happen in Ukraine peace talks without Trump, Putin

      May 15, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (7,968)
    • Investing (1,964)
    • Politics (15,240)
    • Stocks (3,085)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved