Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

JUST IN: Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Biden’s Federal Vaccine Mandate for Healthcare Workers

by October 3, 2022
October 3, 2022
JUST IN: Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Biden’s Federal Vaccine Mandate for Healthcare Workers

The US Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal from Missouri and nine other states challenging Joe Biden’s federal vaccine mandate for healthcare workers.

Last November Joe Biden imposed a federal vaccine mandate on all healthcare workers that affected 10.4 million people.

In January of this year the US Supreme Court blocked Joe Biden’s OSHA vax mandate for private businesses with 100+ employees.

In a separate, simultaneously released ruling, the highest court of the land – in a 5-4 vote – allowed a similar vaccine mandate for healthcare facilities that receive Medicaid and Medicare to stand.

Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and Clarence Thomas dissented earlier this year.

“These cases are not about the efficacy or importance of COVID–19 vaccines. They are only about whether CMS has the statutory authority to force healthcare workers, by coercing their employers, to undergo a medical procedure they do not want and cannot undo. Because the Government has not made a strong showing that Congress gave CMS that broad authority, I would deny the stays pending appeal. I respectfully dissent.” Justice Thomas wrote in his dissenting opinion earlier this year.

Missouri and nine other states appealed to the Supreme Court after the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals bounced the case back to a federal court.

On its first session back Monday, the Supreme Court declined the challenge in an unsigned opinion.

Fox News reported:

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge to the federal vaccine mandate for healthcare workers.

On its first day back in session, the Supreme Court declined to hear an argument from Missouri as well as nine other states — Nebraska, Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming — opposing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate implemented by President Biden’s administration for workers in all healthcare facilities that receive federal funding, Reuters reported.

In April, the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to a federal judge to proceed to a trial, but Missouri then appealed to the Supreme Court.

The justices turned away the appeal on Monday.

In an unsigned opinion, the court wrote: “The challenges posed by a global pandemic do not allow a federal agency to exercise power that Congress has not conferred upon it. At the same time, such unprecedented circumstances provide no grounds for limiting the exercise of authorities the agency has long been recognized to have.” It said the “latter principle governs” in the healthcare arena.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in dissent that the case was about whether the administration has the authority “to force healthcare workers, by coercing their employers, to undergo a medical procedure they do not want and cannot undo.” He said the administration hadn’t shown convincingly that Congress gave it that authority.

The post JUST IN: Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Biden’s Federal Vaccine Mandate for Healthcare Workers appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Family Weekend Turns Deadly For Father Visiting Marist College in New York
next post
Truss appoints former company owner MP Dean Russell as new enterprise minister

You may also like

Cuban-American lawmakers defend Monroe Doctrine amid progressive push...

December 23, 2023

House Republicans ask DEA, CBP to get ‘zombie...

January 16, 2023

He’s Shot: Biden Can Barely Speak in First...

November 18, 2022

GOP senators raise concerns over ‘suddenly’ reassigned director...

November 22, 2023

Southern border in limbo as Title 42 hangs...

December 20, 2022

Iran condemns Austria over report on advanced nuclear...

May 31, 2025

Biden again claims ‘MAGA Republicans’ called for ‘defunding...

March 10, 2023

Kansas Gov. Kelly COVID positive, State of the...

January 11, 2023

Top NIH Director Admits She Was Unaware of...

October 19, 2022

DAVID MARCUS: The Vance vs. Walz debate is...

October 1, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Xi Jinping’s surprise no-show at BRICS Summit fuels speculation about China’s global standing

      July 5, 2025
    • Tesla sees UK sales rebound in June as EV market accelerates

      July 5, 2025
    • Hived raises $42m to roll out electric delivery fleet across southern England

      July 5, 2025
    • Week Ahead: NIFTY Set To Stay In A Defined Range Unless These Levels Are Taken Out; Drags Support Higher

      July 5, 2025
    • “A turning point for education”: James Caan launches bold education reform plan in House of Lords

      July 5, 2025
    • ‘Invest in Women’ fund criticised for slow rollout as MPs call for bolder action

      July 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,397)
    • Investing (2,102)
    • Politics (15,946)
    • Stocks (3,190)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved