Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Banning flights on UK routes with fast rail links ‘could cut flight emissions by third’

by October 12, 2022
October 12, 2022
Banning flights on UK routes with fast rail links ‘could cut flight emissions by third’

Banning flights on routes with fast rail connections could cut the UK’s emissions from domestic aviation by a third, a report has found.

The report by the thinktank Intergenerational Foundation (IF) found that domestic aviation was responsible for the emission of 2.7 megatonnes of CO2 in 2019 alone – the equivalent of the annual emissions from 1.7 million petrol cars or the energy to power 700,000 UK homes for a year.

If domestic flights on routes with a rail alternative under 4.5 hours were banned, the authors say it would reduce emissions by 885 kilotonnes – a 33% reduction. The reduction rises to 53% when only taking Great Britain into account, as there are no rail links between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

The authors of the report call for a domestic flight ban policy similar to the one implemented in France earlier this year. In April, France became the first country to implement a nationwide short-haul flight ban where alternative trains under 2.5 hours were available.

The disruption to commuters, would be minimal, the report suggests, as for two-thirds of passengers travelling between city centres, taking the train adds less than 30 minutes to their journey compared with flying, while almost a third of journeys are as fast or faster by train.

Angus Hanton, from IF, said: “Now is the moment to challenge the unnecessary use of aviation fuel. This new, un-green government wants to use the current cost of living crisis as an excuse to keep people in planes rather than them taking the eco-option of train travel.”

IF says affected routes would only be 14 minutes longer on average by rail than by air, and would be of comparable price when rail journeys were booked in advance.

Other policies recommended by the report called for similar action to be taken to reduce domestic flights, including removing the millions of free pollution permits given to the aviation industry every year, introducing incentives for passengers to travel by train, and revoking tax breaks currently granted to the domestic aviation sector.

Alethea Warrington, a campaigner at climate charity Possible, said: “Travelling by train rather than plane is one of the best things people can do to help tackle the climate crisis. It’s ridiculous that the government refuses to adequately support our rail network, and yet freely hands airlines tax breaks which push unnecessary domestic flights.

“It’s time to get rid of domestic flights and start taxing frequent flying and aircraft fuel. Then we can invest in the efficient, affordable and climate-friendly rail network we so desperately need.”

Read more:
Banning flights on UK routes with fast rail links ‘could cut flight emissions by third’

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
UK economy shrinks by 0.3% as market volatility threatens ‘deep’ recession
next post
Groupon Saving Tips – How to Save Money When Shopping Online

You may also like

Using Brand Storytelling in UX Design

September 18, 2024

Extinction Rebellion co-founder fined for smashing Barclays window

January 9, 2023

Reeves’ tax raid spells ‘game over’ for North...

July 29, 2024

Discover the Luxury of Family Gites: Your Ultimate...

October 28, 2024

Where to Find Top-Tier Talent in 2024

February 16, 2024

Government ‘removes state guarantees from almost £1bn in...

November 1, 2023

European real estate appeal on the global market:...

August 30, 2024

Michelle Kam’s Blueprint for Real Estate Success

December 20, 2024

What SMEs need from the Government in the...

March 27, 2024

Digitisation of trade docs would save firms £1.1bn...

July 11, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Jill Biden’s ‘work husband’ runs for cover as privilege protection crumbles

      June 26, 2025
    • Poll: Majority of Republicans back Trump’s strikes on Iran; most Americans fear getting dragged into war

      June 25, 2025
    • Senate Republicans look to sweeten Medicaid pot to silence dissent on Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 25, 2025
    • Judicial nominee shuts down ‘wildly inaccurate’ claims that he’s Trump’s ‘henchman’

      June 25, 2025
    • Tesla’s European sales fall for a fifth month in a row

      June 25, 2025
    • World leaders flock to meet with Trump at NATO Summit

      June 25, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,314)
    • Investing (2,072)
    • Politics (15,806)
    • Stocks (3,168)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved