Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Sen. Rick Scott Demands Answers About Biden Admin Giving Taxpayer-Funded Intellectual Property to Communist China

by October 21, 2022
October 21, 2022
Sen. Rick Scott Demands Answers About Biden Admin Giving Taxpayer-Funded Intellectual Property to Communist China

Senator Rick Scott is demanding answers about reports that the Department of Energy allowed an innovative battery technology, developed using millions of American taxpayer dollars, to be transferred to a Chinese company.

Sen. Scott noted that the issue is even more troubling because the “DOE reportedly allowed this license transfer to a Communist Chinese company while several American companies have been unable to receive authorization from the agency to manufacture the batteries domestically.”

The Republican sent letters addressed to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science Director Asmeret Asefaw Berhe and Under Secretary for Science and Innovation Geraldine Richmond.

“After millions of our federal dollars were spent to support the work of U.S. scientists, researchers, and engineers in developing the vanadium redox flow battery, your agency permitted the sub-licensure and subsequent license transfer of that technology to a Chinese company based in Dalian, China,” the senator said in the letter.

Sen. Scott continued, “even worse, the Department of Energy apparently allowed this license transfer to the foreign company while several U.S.-based companies have been unable to receive authorization from your agency to manufacture the batteries domestically. This is not only an unconscionable waste of U.S. resources and innovation that will now benefit a foreign adversary, it is apparently a violation of the Department of Energy’s own licensing rules.”

“It is well known that the Chinese Communist Party routinely engages in various acts of corporate espionage and intellectual property theft to gain competitive advantages against American companies and institutions,” the letter added. “However, such nefarious actions are unnecessary if your agency is grossly negligent in safeguarding U.S. taxpayer investments in innovative technologies and fails to perform appropriate due diligence when reviewing sub-licensing and license transfer requests.”

The lawmaker asked Berhe and Richmond to answer a myriad of questions, including “is the review process for sub-licensing requests the same if the applicant is a foreign-based entity?” and “how many foreign entities granted a sub-license by the Department of Energy are based in China?”

The senator also asked, “what other federal agencies are consulted, if any, before a license transfer request is granted to a foreign entity?” and “who is held accountable if a Department of Energy-funded patent or license violates U.S. manufacturing requirements articulated in the Department of Energy’s rules and regulations?”

The questions concluded with, “how will the Department of Energy ensure that taxpayer funded research will no longer be licensed to foreign entities who violate U.S. laws?”

Sen. Scott said that the American people “deserve a full accounting of how this was allowed to happen” and asked for a response to be provided no later than November 11, 2022.

The post Sen. Rick Scott Demands Answers About Biden Admin Giving Taxpayer-Funded Intellectual Property to Communist China appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
EXCLUSIVE: Department of Veteran Affairs LGBTQ Care Coordinator Sends Email to All Members, Including Straight, to Celebrate “International Pronouns Day”
next post
How are payday loans calculated?

You may also like

Justice Roberts uses Pelosi’s words against Biden in...

July 1, 2023

‘Access granted’: Biden’s free vacation at friend’s California...

August 23, 2024

‘Many failures’: Whistleblower exposes how fired Biden-era official...

April 8, 2025

Iranian Students Allegedly Poisoned Ahead of Mass Anti-Regime...

December 6, 2022

Minnesota Democrat argues for menstrual products in boys’...

January 19, 2023

Trump lawyer William Owen Scharf picked for ‘crucial’...

November 17, 2024

FBI, DOJ strike agreement in lawsuit over January...

February 7, 2025

Offshore wind opponents sue turbine company, state of...

July 29, 2023

Senate Democrats, GOP plan to pass CR with...

September 27, 2023

Russian defector who fled with army helicopter found...

February 21, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • The real breakthrough in U.S.–China trade talks is much bigger than just tariffs

      May 15, 2025
    • Dem senator says ‘no doubt’ Biden declined cognitively during presidency

      May 15, 2025
    • Trump makes historic UAE visit as first US president in nearly 30 years

      May 15, 2025
    • GOP reps, advocacy group to target competitive House districts in Trump tax-cut push

      May 15, 2025
    • Biden’s pandemic playbook failed. Trump just offered a smarter path forward

      May 15, 2025
    • MP launches bill to make polluters pay for climate damage and resilience

      May 15, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (7,966)
    • Investing (1,959)
    • Politics (15,230)
    • Stocks (3,084)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved