Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Sen. Rick Scott Demands Answers About Biden Admin Giving Taxpayer-Funded Intellectual Property to Communist China

by October 21, 2022
October 21, 2022
Sen. Rick Scott Demands Answers About Biden Admin Giving Taxpayer-Funded Intellectual Property to Communist China

Senator Rick Scott is demanding answers about reports that the Department of Energy allowed an innovative battery technology, developed using millions of American taxpayer dollars, to be transferred to a Chinese company.

Sen. Scott noted that the issue is even more troubling because the “DOE reportedly allowed this license transfer to a Communist Chinese company while several American companies have been unable to receive authorization from the agency to manufacture the batteries domestically.”

The Republican sent letters addressed to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science Director Asmeret Asefaw Berhe and Under Secretary for Science and Innovation Geraldine Richmond.

“After millions of our federal dollars were spent to support the work of U.S. scientists, researchers, and engineers in developing the vanadium redox flow battery, your agency permitted the sub-licensure and subsequent license transfer of that technology to a Chinese company based in Dalian, China,” the senator said in the letter.

Sen. Scott continued, “even worse, the Department of Energy apparently allowed this license transfer to the foreign company while several U.S.-based companies have been unable to receive authorization from your agency to manufacture the batteries domestically. This is not only an unconscionable waste of U.S. resources and innovation that will now benefit a foreign adversary, it is apparently a violation of the Department of Energy’s own licensing rules.”

“It is well known that the Chinese Communist Party routinely engages in various acts of corporate espionage and intellectual property theft to gain competitive advantages against American companies and institutions,” the letter added. “However, such nefarious actions are unnecessary if your agency is grossly negligent in safeguarding U.S. taxpayer investments in innovative technologies and fails to perform appropriate due diligence when reviewing sub-licensing and license transfer requests.”

The lawmaker asked Berhe and Richmond to answer a myriad of questions, including “is the review process for sub-licensing requests the same if the applicant is a foreign-based entity?” and “how many foreign entities granted a sub-license by the Department of Energy are based in China?”

The senator also asked, “what other federal agencies are consulted, if any, before a license transfer request is granted to a foreign entity?” and “who is held accountable if a Department of Energy-funded patent or license violates U.S. manufacturing requirements articulated in the Department of Energy’s rules and regulations?”

The questions concluded with, “how will the Department of Energy ensure that taxpayer funded research will no longer be licensed to foreign entities who violate U.S. laws?”

Sen. Scott said that the American people “deserve a full accounting of how this was allowed to happen” and asked for a response to be provided no later than November 11, 2022.

The post Sen. Rick Scott Demands Answers About Biden Admin Giving Taxpayer-Funded Intellectual Property to Communist China appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
EXCLUSIVE: Department of Veteran Affairs LGBTQ Care Coordinator Sends Email to All Members, Including Straight, to Celebrate “International Pronouns Day”
next post
How are payday loans calculated?

You may also like

New blue state law gives government increased power...

July 30, 2023

Gun Rights Activist Heller Scores Another Win Against...

September 20, 2022

Russia says Biden’s comparison of Putin and Hamas...

October 21, 2023

Abortion ‘on the ballot’ in 10 states this...

November 5, 2024

Jim Cramer Apologizes For Being Wrong on META...

October 27, 2022

Fifty More Illegal Immigrants Dropped Off In Front...

November 19, 2022

GOP bill takes aim at Congress’ ‘no rules...

June 5, 2025

Iran-backed Houthi launch three attacks in Red Sea,...

February 2, 2024

Project 2025 remains nonpartisan, true to 1980s good-gov’t...

September 3, 2024

IDF says ‘mission is not over’ until hostages...

October 20, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • All-Time Highs and An Upcoming Rate Cut: We’re Just Getting Started on This Move Higher

      June 27, 2025
    • Trump celebrates Supreme Court limits on ‘colossal abuse of power’ by federal judges

      June 27, 2025
    • Second Amendment ‘setback’: Gun tax cuts stripped from Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 27, 2025
    • Don’t Give Big Businesses Immunity from Litigation

      June 27, 2025
    • Unmasking Medicaid Money-Laundering Schemes: Medicaid Financing Gimmicks 101

      June 27, 2025
    • Top moments from the Trump-Biden debate that changed the course of the 2024 election

      June 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,329)
    • Investing (2,077)
    • Politics (15,831)
    • Stocks (3,174)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved