Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Government Testimony Raises More Questions Than Answers in Oathkeepers Trial

by November 3, 2022
November 3, 2022
Government Testimony Raises More Questions Than Answers in Oathkeepers Trial

The Oath Keepers Trial continues this week in Washington DC

Government witness Graydon Young admitted to not conspiring with individuals to commit a crime on Jan. 6, following a cross-examination by defense attorneys this week.

Young pleaded guilty to conspiracy and obstruction of Congress this June. The government put him on the witness stand to testify against Oathkeepers Stewart Rhodes, Kelly Meggs, Kenneth Harrelson, Jessica Watkins, and Thomas Caldwell.

It appeared Young was following instructions in his plea deal to tell the government’s side of the story. He announced his remorse and embarrassment.

However, when the defense cross-examined him, Young admitted he did not conspire with anyone verbally outside of the Capitol. He felt what he was doing was “common sense” given the circumstances.

It appears that the prosecution stringing together a broad narrative that doesn’t fit what actually happened?

Another government witness, FBI Special Agent Harris, admitted to embellishing the “stack formation” Oathkeepers used to stay together. There are no messages within any Oathkeeper chats containing the word ‘stack.’

“We gave them the ‘stack’ name,” said Special Agent Harris, referring to the government.

There is nothing overtly criminal about people standing in a line and placing their hand on the shoulder of the person in front of them.

Harris also admitted a text message prosecutor Jeffrey Nestler showed the jury was used out of context.

Kelly Meggs stated “We’re reloading now” in a group chat. However, defense attorney Juli Haller got Special Agent Harris to admit he was not reloading an actual weapon. In reality, he implied the group was reorganizing.

Judge Mehta appeared to blow this off as though it wasn’t important. He made it sound like Haller’s line of questioning was just a “conversation” as opposed to a real line of questioning.

Is the government trying to confuse legal conduct with criminal conduct because it is hiding something?

It certainly appears that way.  And it is becoming more and more obvious that Judge Mehta and his cohorts in the DC District are corrupt and have no business overseeing any court proceedings.

This article was originally published on AmericanGulag.org.

The post Government Testimony Raises More Questions Than Answers in Oathkeepers Trial appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Jan 6 Protester and Green Beret Jeremy Brown Who Was Arrested for Turning Down FBI Request to Work as Operative on Jan 6 Is Offered a Plea Deal by Corrupt DOJ — Turns It Down
next post
OPED: People Like Joe Biden Who Are Enveloped in Evidence of Election Corruption but Refuse to Acknowledge it Are the Real Fraud Deniers

You may also like

Moscow returns body of Ukrainian journalist killed in...

April 30, 2025

Republicans pop off over Hunter Biden’s rejected plea...

July 27, 2023

‘Designated survivor’ chosen to protect line of succession...

March 8, 2024

Battleground state voters blame Dems’ ‘toxic’ rhetoric for...

September 18, 2024

Mike Lindell Is Suing FBI, DOJ For Violating...

September 21, 2022

Snub of Musk’s NASA nominee ally preceded sudden...

June 6, 2025

Oklahoma Legislature overrides Stitt veto, upholds tribal tobacco...

August 1, 2023

4 of the biggest clashes between Patel, Senate...

January 31, 2025

Claudia Sheinbaum elected as Mexico’s 1st female president

June 3, 2024

Lawmakers: During COVID Distance Learning ‘Disaster’, Leftists Blew...

September 17, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Week Ahead: NIFTY’s Behavior Against This Level Crucial As The Index Looks At Potential Resumption Of An Upmove

      June 7, 2025
    • FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here’s where they said they would

      June 7, 2025
    • ‘Right down the line’: Medicaid reform in ‘big, beautiful bill’ divides lawmakers by party

      June 7, 2025
    • FAST distribution and IA

      June 7, 2025
    • Why Independent Digital Platforms Are Gaining Ground Among UK Entrepreneurs

      June 7, 2025
    • Is Decentralisation the Future of Online Services in the UK?

      June 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,152)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,560)
    • Stocks (3,135)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved