Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Government Testimony Raises More Questions Than Answers in Oathkeepers Trial

by November 3, 2022
November 3, 2022
Government Testimony Raises More Questions Than Answers in Oathkeepers Trial

The Oath Keepers Trial continues this week in Washington DC

Government witness Graydon Young admitted to not conspiring with individuals to commit a crime on Jan. 6, following a cross-examination by defense attorneys this week.

Young pleaded guilty to conspiracy and obstruction of Congress this June. The government put him on the witness stand to testify against Oathkeepers Stewart Rhodes, Kelly Meggs, Kenneth Harrelson, Jessica Watkins, and Thomas Caldwell.

It appeared Young was following instructions in his plea deal to tell the government’s side of the story. He announced his remorse and embarrassment.

However, when the defense cross-examined him, Young admitted he did not conspire with anyone verbally outside of the Capitol. He felt what he was doing was “common sense” given the circumstances.

It appears that the prosecution stringing together a broad narrative that doesn’t fit what actually happened?

Another government witness, FBI Special Agent Harris, admitted to embellishing the “stack formation” Oathkeepers used to stay together. There are no messages within any Oathkeeper chats containing the word ‘stack.’

“We gave them the ‘stack’ name,” said Special Agent Harris, referring to the government.

There is nothing overtly criminal about people standing in a line and placing their hand on the shoulder of the person in front of them.

Harris also admitted a text message prosecutor Jeffrey Nestler showed the jury was used out of context.

Kelly Meggs stated “We’re reloading now” in a group chat. However, defense attorney Juli Haller got Special Agent Harris to admit he was not reloading an actual weapon. In reality, he implied the group was reorganizing.

Judge Mehta appeared to blow this off as though it wasn’t important. He made it sound like Haller’s line of questioning was just a “conversation” as opposed to a real line of questioning.

Is the government trying to confuse legal conduct with criminal conduct because it is hiding something?

It certainly appears that way.  And it is becoming more and more obvious that Judge Mehta and his cohorts in the DC District are corrupt and have no business overseeing any court proceedings.

This article was originally published on AmericanGulag.org.

The post Government Testimony Raises More Questions Than Answers in Oathkeepers Trial appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Jan 6 Protester and Green Beret Jeremy Brown Who Was Arrested for Turning Down FBI Request to Work as Operative on Jan 6 Is Offered a Plea Deal by Corrupt DOJ — Turns It Down
next post
OPED: People Like Joe Biden Who Are Enveloped in Evidence of Election Corruption but Refuse to Acknowledge it Are the Real Fraud Deniers

You may also like

Carjacking crackdown bill passes Wisconsin Legislature

April 19, 2023

Kevin McCarthy elected House speaker in 15th floor...

January 7, 2023

Detroit pastor thanks Trump for visiting the ‘hood’...

June 16, 2024

Kevin McCarthy floats concession on allowing conservatives to...

December 30, 2022

Vance says India-Pakistan conflict ‘none of our business’...

May 9, 2025

RNC launches ‘Bank Your Vote’ websites in 16...

January 5, 2024

‘Terrible message’: GOP lawmaker fumes after only 5...

July 11, 2024

Blinken: Sexual violence Hamas committed on Oct. 7...

December 11, 2023

Top House Republican: The Biden Crime Family Has...

October 16, 2022

Trump’s Republican White House rivals rally around the...

December 20, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

      June 27, 2025
    • The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

      June 27, 2025
    • Barrett eviscerates Jackson, Sotomayor takes on a ‘complicit’ court in contentious final opinions

      June 27, 2025
    • Trump would strike Iran ‘without question’ if it restarts nuclear weapons program

      June 27, 2025
    • Florida man indicted for ’86’ posts allegedly threatening to kill Alina Habba

      June 27, 2025
    • Top House Republicans send stern warning to Senate GOP as Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ risks delay

      June 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,329)
    • Investing (2,079)
    • Politics (15,835)
    • Stocks (3,174)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved