Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

EXCLUSIVE: The Cause of Arizona’s Machine Tabulator Failure Identified – Ballots Larger than Printer Parameters – Willful Incompetence?

by November 13, 2022
November 13, 2022
EXCLUSIVE: The Cause of Arizona’s Machine Tabulator Failure Identified – Ballots Larger than Printer Parameters – Willful Incompetence?

The cause of Arizona’s massive 30% machine tabulator failure is identified.  This action disproportionately affected Republicans and assured delays in counting. 

Technical expert, Dan Sundin, has homed in on the likely cause of why 30% of the tabulators in Arizona could not process the majority of Republican ballots on Election Day.

During the 2022 General Election, the election programming was set up to process 20” long ballots. This was a change from the 2020 General and the 2022 Primary ballots, which were 19” long – an inch shorter.

So when Arizona election officials say they don’t know what happened on November 8th because everything was the same as Arizona’s primary – this isn’t true.

The ballot size wasn’t the same.

Why does that matter?

The sample ballot pdfs published by Maricopa County and the Runbeck-printed ballots used for mail-in voting were correctly made to 20” length in the 2022 General. So there have been no problems processing Democrat-leaning, mail-in ballots.

However, the ballot-on-demand printers used for in-person voting only have 19″ trays that contain 19” ballot paper.

This means, that for in-person voting, the official ballot image had to be compressed to fit on smaller paper than it was built for.

Compression causes the ink to be a little lighter than it should be and thus affects how the tabulators read the ballot.

Maricopa County directed some voting centers to increase how dark the printing was, and this helped the problem somewhat.

The bigger problem, however, is that compressing the image skews where the ovals end up on the paper. The tabulators use a digital map to know where to look for votes. If the ovals aren’t where they belong, the tabulator won’t be able to find them or will misread them. This problem will cause the tabulators to improperly read ovals, or not be able to read the ballot at all.

This is what most likely caused the high rejection rate and why so many ballots ended up having to be set aside in Drawer 3 – which led to another set of problems, and a lot of delays.

We all know delay favors fraud.

The equipment tabulating ballots at the MCTEC center is different than the Dominion ICP tabulators used for in-person, Election Day voting. Those scanners are more forgiving for shrunk/skewed ballots and are able to be manually adjudicated by election workers. That’s likely why we’re not seeing the same problems in the processing of ballots which were cast by mail or early in person.

It’s clear that whatever logic and accuracy testing was done in Arizona to get ready for Election Day wasn’t a real-world test.

The logic and accuracy test used pristine, pre-printed ballots that were professionally printed offsite and fed into the Dominion ICP tabulators to make sure they were working.

A real logic and accuracy test, however, would have used ballots printed on-site by the ballot-on-demand printers. That would have been a genuine end-to-end test, and it would have caught what ended up being a massive problem.

Since Republicans are more likely to vote in person on Election Day, they were disproportionately affected and disenfranchised by the incompetence of the election officials.  Failing to correctly test the system to understand the effect of changing the ballot size was a fatal error.  This amounted to a massive violation of voters’ constitutional rights, which requires equal protection under the law.

This issue didn’t affect the Democrat-leaning, mail-in ballots. The Democrat-leaning, early in-person ballots are processed at the MCTEC Center on equipment more able to process the skewed images and manually adjudicate problem ballots.

We don’t know if all this was intentional or not. But the poorly designed process and failure to properly test equipment under real-world conditions have led to yet another third-world election in Arizona.

It’s worth noting that hand counting would not be affected in the slightest by a skewed ballot. Get rid of the machines.

Hat tip Attorney David Clements and Erin Clements.

The post EXCLUSIVE: The Cause of Arizona’s Machine Tabulator Failure Identified – Ballots Larger than Printer Parameters – Willful Incompetence? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
6 Killed, 81 Injured in Istanbul Explosion (VIDEO)
next post
KFC Uses Kristallnacht to Sell “tender cheese on your crispy chicken” on Kristallnacht “Memorial Day”

You may also like

China, Russia suffer setback to global ambitions with...

December 31, 2023

Gaetz questions Jack Smith’s authority to keep up...

September 9, 2024

Comedian Tim Allen Cracks Very Funny Joke About...

September 21, 2022

Defying Trump, House GOP plans to forge ahead...

March 12, 2024

Daily Recap Podcast 11-8-22: Election Edition!! Plus, Kanye...

November 8, 2022

Ronald Sarasin, former GOP congressman who helmed Capitol...

April 5, 2023

House puts HHS on notice to ensure universities...

September 19, 2024

Trump official blasts Washington Post for ‘fake news’...

February 28, 2025

James Carville says Biden skipping Super Bowl interview...

February 11, 2024

Trump courts Libertarians to draw party activists away...

May 26, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • 7 Hidden Corners of Thailand Worth Adding to Your Travel List

      June 21, 2025
    • On the Expansion of Executive Power: Addendum II

      June 21, 2025
    • ROBERT MAGINNIS: Don’t be misled—Iran isn’t days away from a nuclear bomb

      June 21, 2025
    • Americans agree with Trump that Iran poses threat to United States: poll

      June 21, 2025
    • Arrest of Chinese nationals in swing state, Israel’s fight with Iran are ‘wake up’ call on CCP threat: experts

      June 21, 2025
    • Petition launched as 4 in 5 UK businesses face soaring energy bills without price cap

      June 21, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,277)
    • Investing (2,058)
    • Politics (15,727)
    • Stocks (3,158)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved