Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Mar-a-Lago Raid Story Falls Apart After Midterms, New Leak to WaPo Reveals Trump Took White House Records as ‘Mementos’

by November 17, 2022
November 17, 2022
Mar-a-Lago Raid Story Falls Apart After Midterms, New Leak to WaPo Reveals Trump Took White House Records as ‘Mementos’

Another day, another leak to the Washington Post.

The Washington Post is now reporting (after the midterms) that the DOJ believes Trump took his White House records to Mar-a-Lago as ‘mementos.’

WaPo is reporting that Trump never intended to sell or use the documents as leverage.

Of course we have known this the entire time and WaPo is finally admitting the FBI raid was all a political ploy.

“A review by agents and prosecutors found no discernible business interest in the Mar-a-Lago documents, people familiar with the matter said,” The Post explains. “Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter.”

“FBI interviews with witnesses so far,” The Post adds, citing their sources, “also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell, or use the government secrets. Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property, these people said.”

The Post also said the “analysis of Trump’s likely motive in allegedly keeping the documents is not, strictly speaking, an element of determining whether he or anyone around him committed a crime, or should be charged with one. Justice Department policy dictates that prosecutors file criminal charges in cases in which they believe a crime was committed and the evidence is strong enough to lead to a conviction that will hold up on appeal. But as a practical matter, motive is an important part of how prosecutors assess cases and decide whether to file criminal charges.”

There is no underlying crime which is why DOJ prosecutors are trying to get Trump in a perjury trap by forcing him to confirm the documents seized from Mar-a-Lago in a sworn affidavit.

The Justice Department asked Judge Cannon to compel Trump to affirm or dispute the records seized under penalty of perjury in a 20-page unsealed filing on Monday dated November 8.

“The Special Master has received an affidavit of accuracy from the government. Since the Court appointed the Special Master to ensure fairness, integrity, and even-handedness in the review process […], Plaintiff should be required to verify or correct the property inventory just as the government has done,” the Justice Department’s National Security Division chief Jay I. Bratt wrote in a 20-page filing, Law & Crime reported.

“Now that Plaintiff has reviewed the seized materials and claimed the overwhelming majority of them to be his personal records, considerations of fairness, integrity, and evenhandedness require Plaintiff to do what the government has done — namely, verify the property inventory or correct it if he believes it to be in error,” the filing said. “A fair process requires both parties to ensure that the Special Master is adjudicating disputes over property actually seized from Mar-a-Lago.”

The post Mar-a-Lago Raid Story Falls Apart After Midterms, New Leak to WaPo Reveals Trump Took White House Records as ‘Mementos’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Stop Guessing!
next post
Corrupt Wisconsin Republican Assembly Majority Caucus Kicks out Election Integrity Champion Janel Brandtjen

You may also like

White House launching review of Cabinet protocols after...

January 10, 2024

Tulsi Gabbard to Joe Rogan: Democrat Party is...

October 13, 2022

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to President Trump’s speech to...

March 4, 2025

Tim Scott says GOP voters have ‘hunger’ for...

May 22, 2023

GOP Senator Tillis and Democrat Sinema Agree to...

December 6, 2022

North Dakota considering ban on sexual, LGBT-centric library...

January 18, 2023

WATCH: GOP senators rail against staggering $4.7 trillion...

May 24, 2025

The Daily Recap Podcast 11-17-22: McConnell Slides Into...

November 17, 2022

Gaza aid should go to Israel Iron Dome...

October 20, 2023

Butler Bulldogs Jalen Thomas Out Indefinitely Due to...

October 11, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • The New Retaliation Tax, Section 899

      June 10, 2025
    • M&S reopens online orders after cyberattack disruption

      June 10, 2025
    • UK payrolls see biggest drop since covid as wage growth slows and job market weakens

      June 10, 2025
    • Why AI and green tech are vital to SME growth in 2025

      June 10, 2025
    • Yes, it’s great to get PR coverage – until it’s locked behind a bloody paywall

      June 10, 2025
    • We have to act now to keep AI from becoming a far-left Trojan Horse

      June 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,174)
    • Investing (2,022)
    • Politics (15,580)
    • Stocks (3,138)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved