Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Fed Informants Identified during Oathkeepers Trial – Still No Crime Committed – But Corrupt Judge Breaks 6th Amendment and Will Not Allow Defendants to Confront Accusers

by November 18, 2022
November 18, 2022
Fed Informants Identified during Oathkeepers Trial – Still No Crime Committed – But Corrupt Judge Breaks 6th Amendment and Will Not Allow Defendants to Confront Accusers

Jan. 6 defendant Jessica Watkins

 

You may remember “Be on the Lookout” (BOLO) alerts in the news on or around Jan. 6. The government pushed for citizens to rapidly identify those inside the Capitol and turn them in to law enforcement.

The current Oathkeepers trial has now revealed unidentified individuals who took part in the events of Jan. 6th through a Zello channel. These individuals spoke to defendant Jessica Watkins while she was inside the Capitol, provoking her to remain in the building and suggesting she engage in questionable activities.

According to government prosecutors led by Jeffrey Nestler, “There is no question that the Zello participants saw themselves as part of Watkins’ team on the ground.”

Then why is Watkins standing trial while many of these participants have not yet been indicted or publicly investigated?

American Gulag sent a courtroom observer into the public Oathkeepers trial and obtained the screennames of those associated with the group chats.

Patty Gee

Bob Baker

Dian Tomlin

Rich Lupo

Terry Cummings

Rick Jackson

Paul Stamey

John Willow

Dennis Godbold

Joe Godbold

Adrian Grimes

Jim Donaldson

Steve Vanderbol

Todd Kandoris

Doug Smith (Ranger Smith)

Rob Picco

Holden Haney (Oathkeepers Dozer

Horsewhisperer

Highlander KT

MO POC

Marlin

Law2187

When defense attorney James Bright recently asked FBI Special Agent John Moore whether Rob Ricco on this list had been investigated, he answered “no.”

Moore then stated he “knew” Steve Vanderbol, “had been in a member’s house,” and recognized the kitchen, bedroom décor, and specific rooms in photos.

Does the public have a right to know whether these and other individuals are paid government informants? What are the consequences if even one of these people is found working for the government?

Jessica Watkins is accused of criminal behavior for listening to incoming Zello messages and receiving chats from a group thread.

However, evidence from this trial revealed how Joe Godbold and Adrian Grimes conspired to break a curfew by going out to pick up Dennis Godbold. Why does the government brush over the actions of these uncharged defendants while aggressively investigating others?

The government has worked to keep the identity of some individuals concealed from the public. When prosecutor Jeffrey Nestler questioned FBI Special Agent Drew, he instructed Drew not to name the individuals who broke down the barricades.

Agent Drew spoke as if she genuinely knew their names from rehearsing a video narration. However, she was thrown off guard and almost slipped up.

Before trial, Nestler stated the government would not identify uncharged individuals on the Zello channel and chat threads. He falsely identified Stewart Rhodes as one of these individuals initially, claiming Rhodes used others’ screennames. Is it possible others are doing what Rhodes is accused of?

We also know that the fed informants were THE ONLY ONES calling for violence on the secret Zello channel.

Oath Keepers Show Trial: Government Is Hiding Its Informants, the Only Ones Who Called for Violence on Walkie-Talkie App – Complete Kangaroo Court

So why is the government rushing this bogus case forward?

The Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees a person accused of a crime has the right to confront his accusers.

This article was originally published on AmericanGulag.org.

The post Fed Informants Identified during Oathkeepers Trial – Still No Crime Committed – But Corrupt Judge Breaks 6th Amendment and Will Not Allow Defendants to Confront Accusers appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Dr. Peter McCullough on Rose Unplugged: New Covid Strains? (AUDIO)
next post
“We Won” – Rep. Lauren Boebert Declares Victory Against Democrat Challenger in a Tight Race – Automatic Recount Underway

You may also like

‘Republicans, beware’: Dem super PAC bankrolled by dark...

June 20, 2024

Idaho Supreme Court upholds abortion law after Planned...

January 6, 2023

Hunter Biden’s ‘sugar brother’ lawyer confirms he still...

January 24, 2024

Harris failing to cobble together Biden’s winning 2020...

September 6, 2024

Millions more food stamp recipients required to work...

February 24, 2025

Senate Armed Services leaders ask Pentagon watchdog to...

March 28, 2025

Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt calls for investigation into...

February 4, 2023

US Army Misses Recruiting Goal by 25%

October 3, 2022

Russia again extends detention of Wall Street Journal...

March 26, 2024

Congressional Republicans face bruising battle to avoid government...

July 21, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump asks SCOTUS to uphold freeze on billions in USAID payments

      August 27, 2025
    • Three Years of Sounding the Debt Alarm at Cato and on the Debt Dispatch

      August 27, 2025
    • Trump Administration Rightly Attacks EU Tech Regulations but Tariffs and Censorship at Home Harm Americans 

      August 27, 2025
    • White House demands all Gaza hostages return home ‘this week’ amid stalled talks

      August 27, 2025
    • Bankruptcy, Hell, and Exit Barriers

      August 27, 2025
    • Trump’s DC Death Penalty Crusade Threatens More Tyranny of the Minority

      August 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,897)
    • Investing (2,246)
    • Politics (16,501)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved