Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Overbearing Protective Orders Placed on Paul Pelosi Trial. Why is This Being So Protected??

by December 6, 2022
December 6, 2022
Overbearing Protective Orders Placed on Paul Pelosi Trial.  Why is This Being So Protected??

Last October, Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, was allegedly attacked by an intruder at the Pelosi’s home in San Francisco sometime around 2 am.  The 82 year old millionaire reportedly suffered a severe brain injury from a full force blow from a hammer to the head that required immediate brain surgery. He was, however, able to give a statement during the ambulance ride to the hospital.

The alleged attacker, David DePape, was a seemingly unemployed drifter living in someone’s garage with a fascination for making hemp necklaces.  He had a strange about face from extreme progressive politics, according to his ex lover and mother to his child, Gypsy Taub, to an ultra right wing QAnon conspiracy theorist (insert any other “ultra-MAGA” trigger words.)

At least that is what is implied after two websites long-credited to DePape turned into “conspiracy theory” hotbeds on August 23rd and 24th, 2022 after years of inactivity.  That’s also, coincidentally, the day Paul Pelosi plead out on his DUI case involving two totaled cars, an injury, and a never disclosed witness, according to the New York Times.  According to Jesse Watters, the off-duty sheriff who initially arrived on scene checked if everyone was ok and then left them in the dark at 2 am in Napa Valley without waiting for authorities to arrive.  The Napa Valley DA put a gag order on that sheriff.

Law enforcement and the media alike would have the public believe that 42-year-old DePape was somehow able to bypass any and all security and make entry into the home of the 2nd in line to the Presidency at 2 am and take her husband hostage with little to no effort.

In fact, if DePape hadn’t stood there and watched Pelosi call the police, as the report would have us believe, DePape would have been there undetected and without any sense of urgency.  I guess the January 2021 severed “pigs head” left in the Pelosi’s driveway and the graffiti to their garage didn’t intimidate them enough to buy an alarm system, despite living in a multimillion dollar home with a net worth upwards of $200 million.

As reported previously by The Gateway Pundit, the “Statements of Fact” between the local law enforcement and the FBI don’t match.  The FBI would have us believe that DePape was motivated by the Founding Fathers as they claim in their report.  The FBI also mentions a witness who laid out an interesting timeline regarding the loud sound, likely the breaking of the lament glass, and “a minute or two later” the sound of the sirens.

This entire event could be verified by releasing either the CCTV footage of the camera that would have been looking DePape right in the face as he was breaking the glass, or any of the other four cameras that should have caught him lurking around the residence.  Or perhaps the body cam footage from the two SFPD officers that responded.  Or the recorded confession by DePape.  It would be illuminating to know whether or not the Pelosis had an alarm system and why Capitol Police detail was not protecting the residence.

It is unlikely we’ll get those answers, especially now that protective orders are being placed on all of the evidence.  According to Julie Kelly of American Greatness:

Boy, they sure don’t want any of the evidence in the case against Paul Pelosi’s attacker to be made public. Very strict protective order recently filed: pic.twitter.com/lwhMqtFdyb

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) December 5, 2022

Seems a little extreme in a situation where the public has already been told all the undeniable facts, right? pic.twitter.com/8D92O0vKSQ

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) December 5, 2022

Why is this case being so tightly protected?  NBC’s Miguel Almaguer was suspended after publishing a story about the encounter that alleged Paul Pelosi opened the door to police and then walked back to his alleged “attacker.” NBC quickly removed the story and then, a week later, Almaguer was suspended.  Since then, he’s been apparently touring Europe, posting pictures to social media in front of iconic European landmarks, according to FOX News.

This story needs more attention.  And a demand for answers that not only should be easy to give, but are required by open records laws.

The post Overbearing Protective Orders Placed on Paul Pelosi Trial. Why is This Being So Protected?? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Dems Lower Voting Age To 16 In Cities – Pelosi Once Said: “It’s Important To Capture Kids While They’re In High School”
next post
Biden Regime’s Partisan and Illegal ‘Parents Council’ Immediately and Permanently Disbanded Following Parental Rights Groups’ Lawsuit

You may also like

CENTCOM releases statement after latest Houthi attack in...

January 13, 2024

Democrats erupt in jeers after GOP congresswoman accuses...

January 5, 2023

“People Don’t Want Their Children Sexualized!” – HUNDREDS...

September 25, 2022

Sen Paul says Ukraine aid package would ‘tie...

February 13, 2024

Haiti waits for Kenyan police mission to fight...

March 29, 2024

RFK Jr. slams Democrat in fiery hearing, says...

May 20, 2025

It’s Beginning: Arizona Ballot Stuffer Caught Covering Up...

October 18, 2022

“A Bright New Solution” — Medical Hero Dr....

October 11, 2022

Harris slammed as ‘CopyCatKamala’ for following Trump’s lead...

August 11, 2024

Why House Republicans should be cooking with gas

June 10, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Rescissions: A Small but Welcome Step Toward Spending Discipline

      June 5, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Why Navy ships should not be named for gay rights icons

      June 5, 2025
    • GREGG JARRETT: Biden, the ‘marionette president; and the case of the runaway autopen

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump Practically Bans Travel and Immigration from 12 Countries with Flimsy Security Justifications

      June 5, 2025
    • ‘He’s not a big factor’: Trump’s Senate allies dismiss Elon Musk’s calls to ‘kill the bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Fears grow that Tata Steel could be excluded from Starmer-Trump trade deal

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,523)
    • Stocks (3,127)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved