Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Electoral Count Act reforms included within Biden’s $1.7 trillion bipartisan budget deal

by December 20, 2022
December 20, 2022
Electoral Count Act reforms included within Biden’s $1.7 trillion bipartisan budget deal

Democrats and Republicans have attached legislation rewriting the 19th-century Electoral Count Act to President Biden’s $1.7 trillion budget, a move that lawmakers say could help avert a repeat of the Jan. 6, 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol. 

The bill, which is the byproduct of bipartisan negotiation, would clarify that the vice president only has a ceremonial role in counting Electoral College votes.

‘Reforming the Electoral Count Act is necessary to prevent it from being manipulated to subvert, rather than support, the peaceful transfer of power,’ said Rep. John Sarbanes, D-Md. 

The ambiguity surrounding the vice president’s role under the 1887 Electoral Count Act was put to the test after the 2020 election. Former President Trump and his allies argued that the law allowed the vice president to reject electors from states with irregularities.

Vice President Mike Pence took a different view, arguing that the Electoral Count Act stipulates only Electoral College tallies affirmed by state governors can be certified. 

‘To his credit, Mike Pence understood that — and he got legal opinions leading up to it — and despite all the pressure that he got, he stood firm and understood what that role was,’ said South Dakota Senate Republican Whip John Thune.

The bill’s authors, Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin and GOP Sen. Susan Collins, say they were pushed to fix the Electoral Count Act after seeing how its ambiguities led to the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol. 

‘We were all there on Jan. 6. That happened,’ Manchin, D-W.Va., told the Senate Rules committee earlier this year. ‘We have a duty, a responsibility to make sure it never happens again.’

Apart from clarifying the vice president’s role, the legislation would also require that at least one-fifth of lawmakers from both the House and Senate are needed to force a vote on certifying a state’s electoral votes. 

Under the current law, only one member of the House and one member of the Senate need to object to force a vote.  

Haris Alic is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital covering Congress. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Jeffries expected to name DelBene as new DCCC head: report
next post
Biden Cabinet member’s daughter lobbying Congress on issue her mom has final say on: ‘Conflict of interest’

You may also like

VIDEO: Boston Children’s Hospital Cuts Video Telling Parents...

October 9, 2022

Biden will address nation from Oval Office on...

July 23, 2024

Sen. Hawley RIPS Chris Wray: “Do You Think...

November 18, 2022

Democrats’ “Newest Megadonor” Loses Billions As Crypto Exchange...

November 10, 2022

Dems accused of ‘stonewalling’ Tulsi Gabbard confirmation after...

January 8, 2025

Rep. Eric Swalwell Is Campaigning For Democrat With...

October 30, 2022

JOE CONCHA: My top five ‘Cringe’ Jean-Pierre moments

January 18, 2025

Pro-Trump conservatives rail against Matt Gaetz over push...

October 4, 2023

Democratic lawmaker falsely claims House Republicans tried to...

October 1, 2023

After White House trans flag controversy, Senators demand...

September 24, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • TSA tells Americans their Costco cards won’t fly at airport security despite love for hot dogs

      June 7, 2025
    • Trump announces China will restart rare earth mineral shipments to US after productive call

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk feud presents ‘unprecedented’ dynamic compared to past Trump disputes: expert

      June 7, 2025
    • Snub of Musk’s NASA nominee ally preceded sudden ‘big, beautiful bill’ criticism, Trump feud

      June 6, 2025
    • Supreme Court rules DOGE can access Social Security information

      June 6, 2025
    • US sanctions money laundering network aiding Iran as regime faces nuclear reprimand at IAEA

      June 6, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,149)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,558)
    • Stocks (3,134)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved