Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Supreme Court leaker of decision overturning Roe still not publicly identified more than 7 months later

by December 20, 2022
December 20, 2022
Supreme Court leaker of decision overturning Roe still not publicly identified more than 7 months later

The Supreme Court has yet to identify the person who leaked the draft opinion of the Supreme Court case that overturned Roe v. Wade, more than seven months after the leak.

On May 2, Politico published a draft of the decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the major abortion case that would eventually overturn Roe v. Wade. The unprecedented leak triggered protests across the country and at the justices’ homes that continued for months.

In a rare statement on May 3, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts said the court would investigate how the opinion got out and said the leak ‘was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that is an affront to the Court and the community of public servants who work here.’

But nearly eight months into the investigation, the identity of the leaker has yet to be revealed.

MORE THAN 100 PRO-LIFE ORGS, CHURCHES ATTACKED SINCE DOBBS LEAK 

In October, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said the unprecedented leak made him and other majority justices into targets of possible political violence from those who opposed it.

‘The leak also made those of us who were thought to be in the majority in support of overruling Roe and Casey targets for assassination because it gave people a rational reason to think they could prevent that from happening by killing one of us,’ Alito said at an event hosted by the Heritage Foundation. 

But Alito did not appear to have knowledge of the leaker’s identity.

In September, Justice Elena Kagan said she was hopeful for an update on the investigation by the end of the month.

Also in September, Justice Neil Gorsuch said at a conference that he hopes the committee overseeing the investigation into the leaker has a report ‘soon,’ according to a Wall Street Journal report. It’s unclear if that investigation report would be made available to the public even if it did determine who leaked the decision.

The press office of the Supreme Court did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for an update into the investigation.

Brianna Herlihy is a politics writer for Fox News Digital.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Turning Point Action AmericaFest 2022 straw poll results reveal overwhelming call for new RNC leadership
next post
Jeffries expected to name DelBene as new DCCC head: report

You may also like

House set to pass $1.7T spending bill over...

December 23, 2022

Blinken arrives in Middle East to renew cease-fire...

August 18, 2024

Joe Biden While Hosting Atlanta Braves at White...

September 26, 2022

Trump unable to get $464M appeal bond to...

March 19, 2024

North Carolina AG won’t bring charges against Mark...

December 31, 2022

Trump says he has UFO files – will...

June 27, 2024

Biden regulations have cost Americans almost $10,000 per...

June 29, 2023

Trump House GOP ally on board with tax...

April 22, 2025

Trump watches strike on Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen...

March 16, 2025

New poll reveals what Democrats think of Harris...

July 19, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • IVF parents should have right to paid fertility leave, says GMB union

      June 9, 2025
    • Reform UK clashes with Bank of England over interest payments to lenders

      June 9, 2025
    • Trump ally stands firm against ‘big, beautiful bill’ despite pressure: ‘It’ll completely backfire’

      June 8, 2025
    • Rubio condemns assassination attempt on Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe

      June 8, 2025
    • Obama WH physician says Biden doc should have performed cognitive test

      June 8, 2025
    • Trump warns of ‘serious consequences’ if Elon Musk funds Democrats

      June 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,154)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,571)
    • Stocks (3,136)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved