Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Supreme Court leaker of decision overturning Roe still not publicly identified more than 7 months later

by December 20, 2022
December 20, 2022
Supreme Court leaker of decision overturning Roe still not publicly identified more than 7 months later

The Supreme Court has yet to identify the person who leaked the draft opinion of the Supreme Court case that overturned Roe v. Wade, more than seven months after the leak.

On May 2, Politico published a draft of the decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the major abortion case that would eventually overturn Roe v. Wade. The unprecedented leak triggered protests across the country and at the justices’ homes that continued for months.

In a rare statement on May 3, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts said the court would investigate how the opinion got out and said the leak ‘was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that is an affront to the Court and the community of public servants who work here.’

But nearly eight months into the investigation, the identity of the leaker has yet to be revealed.

MORE THAN 100 PRO-LIFE ORGS, CHURCHES ATTACKED SINCE DOBBS LEAK 

In October, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said the unprecedented leak made him and other majority justices into targets of possible political violence from those who opposed it.

‘The leak also made those of us who were thought to be in the majority in support of overruling Roe and Casey targets for assassination because it gave people a rational reason to think they could prevent that from happening by killing one of us,’ Alito said at an event hosted by the Heritage Foundation. 

But Alito did not appear to have knowledge of the leaker’s identity.

In September, Justice Elena Kagan said she was hopeful for an update on the investigation by the end of the month.

Also in September, Justice Neil Gorsuch said at a conference that he hopes the committee overseeing the investigation into the leaker has a report ‘soon,’ according to a Wall Street Journal report. It’s unclear if that investigation report would be made available to the public even if it did determine who leaked the decision.

The press office of the Supreme Court did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for an update into the investigation.

Brianna Herlihy is a politics writer for Fox News Digital.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Turning Point Action AmericaFest 2022 straw poll results reveal overwhelming call for new RNC leadership
next post
Jeffries expected to name DelBene as new DCCC head: report

You may also like

MSNBC Reporter Asks Trump Supporters Stupid Question About...

October 25, 2022

Bipartisan senators’ bill would require Congress to approve...

April 3, 2025

Dem strategists fret Harris ‘sugar high’ is over:...

October 10, 2024

WHO COULD IT BE? CNN Reportedly Planning to...

October 12, 2022

NY v. Trump: Judge Merchan to present jury...

May 29, 2024

Oklahoma AG Drummond takes over prosecution of top...

February 7, 2023

Netanyahu says security in Gaza is critical to...

September 6, 2024

Karine Jean-Pierre Absurdly Claims Real Disposable Income is...

October 11, 2022

South Dakota Gov. Noem breaks longstanding tradition, foregoes...

January 28, 2023

DeSantis to be sworn in for second term...

January 3, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • House Democrats call on Rubio to allow injured children from Gaza into US following visa halt

      August 27, 2025
    • SkyWater pitches itself as all-American firm as Trump mulls more equity deals following Intel deal

      August 27, 2025
    • 600,000 Chinese Students Would Be a Windfall for the United States

      August 26, 2025
    • EPA urged by state AGs to axe funds for ‘radical’ climate project accused of training judges

      August 26, 2025
    • ‘Doctor Strangelove with a mustache’: Bolton blasted for ‘profiteering’ off US secrets by White House advisor

      August 26, 2025
    • Bolton may be in hot water as FBI investigation expands beyond controversial book

      August 26, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,886)
    • Investing (2,242)
    • Politics (16,495)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved