Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

How do you solve a problem like George Santos? GOP faces catch-22 with embattled freshman congressman

by January 11, 2023
January 11, 2023
How do you solve a problem like George Santos? GOP faces catch-22 with embattled freshman congressman

House Republicans are in a quandary as to what to do about Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., and his fantastical stream of falsehoods. Most Republicans have said that this is up to the people of his district. However, there are increasing calls from New York Republicans — notably Rep. Anthony D’Esposito — for Santos to resign.

Here’s the operational problem for House Republicans:

Their majority is now 222-212. Democrats are expected to win a special election in Virginia Feb. 21 to fulfill the unexpired term of late Rep. Donald McEachin, D-Va., who died shortly after the election.

That would make the GOP majority 222-213. It’s 221-213 if Santos steps aside and Democrats win the Virginia special election. 

It’s about the math.

That would mean Republicans can only lose three votes on any given roll call. By rule, a tie vote fails.

Democrats are already tying Santos to House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and his narrow victory for the speakership in the wee hours of Saturday morning.

Santos says he will not resign. And even if he does, Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul must declare the seat vacant and schedule a special election in accordance with New York law. A primary and general election could take months. Remember that, under the Constitution, no one may be appointed to the House. 

Secondly, it is unclear if Republicans would hold this seat. This is a seat that flipped from blue to red. It was held by former Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., in the previous Congress. 

So, what are GOPers to do about Santos?

The easy alternative would be to wait for the House Ethics Committee to conduct an investigation and recommend a penalty for Santos. Such an inquest could take months.

However, any member could introduce a resolution to potentially punish or expel Santos. 

Such a step is considered under a provision in the House known as a ‘question of privilege.’ By rule, the House must consider the resolution to sanction or expel Santos within two days — whether or not Santos goes before the Ethics Committee. However, the measure must come up on the House floor immediately if offered by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.

If any House member were to vote to punish or expel Santos on the fly, Republicans have a decision to make.

A tricky one.

They could move to ‘table’ or kill the resolution to punish or expel Santos. That is a vote, one step removed from actually taking action on the resolution itself. It serves as a fig leaf for members who don’t want to be on the hook for judging Santos. But if the House votes to table, the effort to take action on Santos is dead. 

However, a vote to table could come at a serious political cost for Republicans.

It’s also possible Republicans could move to ‘refer’ the Santos matter to the Ethics Committee. That gives GOPers a little more breathing room and bottles the issue up in the Ethics Committee for months. And that may not be a good political alternative either for Republicans.

But it’s also possible the House could simply take an up or down vote on punishing Santos.

The three customary modes of discipline in the House are reprimand, censure and expulsion.

Former Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., was the last member censured by the House in late 2010.

Expulsion is a different animal.

The House has only expelled five members in history. The last was late Rep. Jim Traficant, D-Ohio, in 2002. Under the Constitution, expulsion requires a two-thirds vote of the House.

An up or down vote on punishment or expulsion could be a challenging roll call tally for some Republicans. The same with a vote to table or refer to the Ethics Committee. Both could be viewed as trying to shield Santos. 

Chad Pergram currently serves as a senior congressional correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC). He joined the network in September 2007 and is based out of Washington, D.C.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
BLM-backed Dem candidate sentenced to 22 months in prison for wire fraud scheme
next post
How To Invest in Value Stocks: A Turn Around May Be in Play

You may also like

DOGE team welcomed at the Pentagon but some...

February 18, 2025

Jordan to hold third round speaker vote Thursday...

October 19, 2023

White House condemns antisemitism, violent anti-Israel anarchy at...

May 1, 2024

Who had access to Biden classified documents? Republican...

January 13, 2023

Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor Rejects Emergency Appeal From...

November 10, 2022

Joe Biden *Literally* Runs Away From Reporters Asking...

October 7, 2022

Trump nominates Susan Monarez to become the next...

March 25, 2025

Trump energy plan will avoid Europe’s energy disaster

January 8, 2025

Medical Freedom Advocates Speak Out After Biden Administration...

November 1, 2022

Rand Paul’s ‘Festivus Report’ airs $482 billion worth...

December 23, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Friday Feature: Incubate Debate

      June 6, 2025
    • Risch urges ‘top to bottom’ USAID spending review after waste, fraud exposed

      June 6, 2025
    • Universities in Libertarian Land

      June 6, 2025
    • Elon Musk may speak to Trump aides in push to calm feud

      June 6, 2025
    • Everyone Talks About Leaving a Better Planet for Our Children: Why Don’t We Leave Better Children for Our Planet?

      June 6, 2025
    • MARK HALPERIN: Democrats try to construct a Frankenstein candidate while JD Vance gains momentum for 2028

      June 6, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,149)
    • Investing (2,013)
    • Politics (15,545)
    • Stocks (3,130)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved