Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Kamala Harris calls House-passed Born Alive Act ‘extreme,’ claims it jeopardizes reproductive rights

by January 12, 2023
January 12, 2023
Kamala Harris calls House-passed Born Alive Act ‘extreme,’ claims it jeopardizes reproductive rights

Vice President Kamala Harris blasted Republican legislators in the House of Representatives after they voted 220-210 to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Posting to the VP account Wednesday night, Harris called the bill ‘extreme’ and said it ‘will further jeopardize the right to reproductive health care in our country.’

Harris also claimed House Republicans are attempting to ‘control women’s bodies’ with the legislation.

The bill would require immediate medical attention for babies who are born alive after an attempt was made to abort them.

It also deems an infant born alive after an attempted abortion a ‘legal person for all purposes under the laws of the United States.’ 

Doctors would be required to care for those infants as a ‘reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to any other child born alive.’ They would also be required to admit infants to a hospital for further care.

Any doctor who violates that standard would face fines and imprisonment up to five years, or both. The bill does not penalize the mother.

Almost all Democrats in the House voted against the act, with 210 nays. Only one Democrat, Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas, voted in favor of the bill — and one other Democrat, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, voted ‘present.’

Many Democrats opposing the bill argued it is a way for the GOP to outlaw abortion, though the bill places no new limits on abortion and focuses on the care that would be required of an infant who survives an attempt.

Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., said the bill would set up new requirements that ‘directly interfere with the doctors’ medical judgment and dictate a medical standard of care that may not be appropriate in all circumstances.’

Nadler, and other members of his party, also argued taking the infant to a hospital may not be in the ‘best interest of the family.’

‘I find it absurd, I find it unconscionable that this would be a matter of discussion on this body, that we would not render medical aid to the most innocent amongst us, an unborn child that is born alive after the most traumatic circumstances possible,’ said. Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis.

‘This is not about a woman’s access to abortion,’ Orden said. ‘This is about the sanctity of life and the basic dignity of a human child.’

The bill now heads to the Democrat-controlled Senate, where it is likely to fail.

Fox News Digital’s Peter Kasperowicz contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Returners to work set to be allowed to keep disability payments
next post
NatWest provides debt extension for those struggling with borrowing repayments

You may also like

Lawmakers demand Bondi’s DOJ investigate Biden’s post-Election Day...

February 7, 2025

DHS refuses to release data on illegal immigrants’...

September 20, 2023

Even if Trump secures Ukraine-Russia peace deal, can...

March 12, 2025

GOP lawmakers rip Hunter Biden’s cozy relationship with...

October 3, 2023

Karine Jean-Pierre Says She’s “Not Going to Get...

October 26, 2022

DHS Issues National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin in...

December 2, 2022

Rasmussen Shows GOP Increasing Lead in the Overall...

October 28, 2022

Democrat Gov. Andy Beshear’s tornado relief fund ‘erroneously’...

February 2, 2023

Biden campaign brings in $42 million in January,...

February 20, 2024

RFK Jr. vows he won’t take cheeseburgers away,...

January 29, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Slovenia approves law to legalize assisted dying for terminally-ill adults

      July 19, 2025
    • Heritage Foundation founder Edwin J. Feulner dies at 83

      July 19, 2025
    • Rubio announces visa revocations on Brazilian judge for ‘political witch hunt’ against ex-president Bolsonaro

      July 19, 2025
    • Justice Department moves to unseal Epstein, Maxwell grand jury transcripts amid calls for transparency

      July 19, 2025
    • Trump says 10 hostages will be returning from Gaza ‘very shortly’ during White House dinner with allies

      July 19, 2025
    • EPA announces 23% workforce reduction and closure of research office as part of federal streamlining

      July 19, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,524)
    • Investing (2,134)
    • Politics (16,120)
    • Stocks (3,220)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved