Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

New Kansas AG Kobach wants state Supreme Court to reconsider abortion ruling

by January 12, 2023
January 12, 2023
New Kansas AG Kobach wants state Supreme Court to reconsider abortion ruling

Kansas’ anti-abortion Republican attorney general is asking the state’s highest court to reconsider a landmark decision protecting access to abortion months after a decisive statewide vote affirming abortion rights.

Attorney General Kris Kobach said Wednesday that one reason for the Kansas Supreme Court to reconsider its 2019 ruling is the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in June overturning Roe v. Wade and declaring that the U.S. Constitution doesn’t grant a right to abortion access. The Kansas court is set to consider that issue and others in two abortion cases on Jan. 30, though Kobach said he is likely to ask for a few weeks’ delay because he took office only Monday.

The Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that access to abortion is a matter of women’s bodily autonomy and a ‘fundamental’ right under the state’s own Bill of Rights. The decision came in the first stage of a lawsuit challenging a 2015 state law banning the most common second-trimester abortion procedure, and the court is now considering the question of whether that not-yet-enforced law violates the state constitution. It also is considering the validity of extra health and safety regulations for abortion providers.

In August, Kansas voters in August rejected a proposed amendment to the state constitution pushed by Republican legislators to overturn the 2019 Kansas court decision and allow lawmakers to ban abortion. That 2019 decision inspired two self-described abortion ‘abolitionists’ to protest Wednesday at the Statehouse before and during Kansas Supreme Court Justice Marla Luckert’s annual State of the Judiciary address to legislators.

Democratic state Rep. John Carmichael, a Wichita attorney and abortion rights supporter, said he doubts the Kansas Supreme Court will reverse itself. Following the vote against the anti-abortion measure in August, six of the seven justices, including Luckert, faced yes-or-no votes in November on whether they would stay on the bench for another six years, and all were retained by wide margins.

‘The court made the right decision based on the facts and the law, and to that extent, yes, the people vindicated that decision,’ Carmichael said, though he added, ‘I don’t expect that to impact the court in its judicial decision-making.’

Kobach is inheriting the state’s defense of existing abortion restrictions from his predecessor, Republican Derek Schmidt, who left office Monday after losing the race for governor in November.

Kobach noted not only the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in June but also an Iowa Supreme Court decision the week before, overtuning its own 2018 ruling that protected abortion rights.

‘One of the things that affects any court reconsidering any precedence is intervening events,’ Kobach said. ‘There have been intervening events.’

The two Statehouse protesters, Clifton Boje and Kevan Myers, from the Kansas City, Kansas, area, had signs calling for banning abortion and describing themselves as ‘ambassadors of Jesus Christ.’

Myers argued that the Kansas Supreme Court’s 2019 decision violates a provision of the state’s Bill of Rights guaranteeing ‘natural rights,’ including ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’ The court said in 2019 that the provison protected bodily autonomy.

As lawmakers admitted Luckert and her fellow justices into the House chamber for her address, Myers said, ‘Oh, friends, there’s no right to murder.’

Afterward, Luckert told reporters after her speech that she heard the protesters’ messages but, ‘I don’t take an opinion poll before I make my decision.’

Asked whether August’s statewide vote vindicated the court, Luckert said, ‘Vindication is not a part of my job. My job is to uphold the law, and regardless of what that vote had been, I made my legal decision based on the law.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
White House claims Biden classified docs were ‘inadvertently misplaced’
next post
Buttigieg avoided calls, public appearances on paternity leave, FOIA documents show

You may also like

‘I AM 100 OUT OF 100’: Meet Alabama’s...

January 17, 2023

MTG shows censored nude pictures of Hunter Biden...

July 20, 2023

Biden sets economy-wide climate target: Reducing emissions 66%...

December 19, 2024

State Department says it has provided guidance to...

June 21, 2025

Mexican drug lord convicted in killing of DEA...

April 10, 2025

DYSTOPIA: Shanghai’s Disney Resort Locks All Visitors Inside...

November 1, 2022

White House promotes Kirby to expanded role to...

February 12, 2024

“The American People Want Us to Work Together”...

November 29, 2022

Supreme Court temporarily halts termination of Title 42,...

December 27, 2022

WAYNE ROOT: It’s All Rigged Like Pro Wrestling:...

December 8, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Senate shuts down Kaine’s attempt to check Trump’s war powers

      June 28, 2025
    • 3 Stock Setups for the Second Half of 2025

      June 28, 2025
    • Trump touts administration’s progress on peace deals, says world leaders ‘respect our country again’

      June 27, 2025
    • Venezuelan opposition member details harrowing 400-day captivity at UN

      June 27, 2025
    • Anxious Republicans turn to Trump amid divisions over ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 27, 2025
    • JD Vance poised to clinch victory for Trump’s landmark bill as GOP finalizes strategy

      June 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,329)
    • Investing (2,081)
    • Politics (15,842)
    • Stocks (3,176)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved