Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

SCOTUS shoots down appeal of NY concealed carry restriction ruling, allowing gun law to still be enforced

by January 18, 2023
January 18, 2023
SCOTUS shoots down appeal of NY concealed carry restriction ruling, allowing gun law to still be enforced

The Supreme Court announced Wednesday that it would not entertain an injunction from New York gun store owners who were challenging the state’s new restrictions on the concealed carrying of firearms.

In a one-sentence order, the court said it would not put enforcement of the law on hold, following its ruling last week that the restrictions can remain in place while litigation over the law moves forward.

‘The application for writ of injunction presented to Justice Sotomayor and by her referred to the Court is denied,’ the court said in its order. None of the justices dissented.

New York’s law, the Concealed Carry Improvement Act, makes it a felony to possess a gun in ‘sensitive areas’ like stadiums, houses of worship, museums, parks and public transit. It also requires people to undergo certain training in order to have a license.

The prohibition against possessing a concealed firearm in a park is part of criticism leveled by Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., against N.Y. Gov. Kathy Hochul.

‘Kathy Hochul’s gun grabbing agenda that classifies lawful gun owners in the Adirondack Park as felons is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. I am committed to bringing this all the way to the Supreme Court on behalf of the #2A rights of New Yorkers,’ Stefanik tweeted Wednesday.

Stefanik and fellow New York Republican Reps. Claudia Tenney and Nick Langworthy reintroduced a House resolution along with Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., calling New York’s current law unconstitutional. 

‘All States should pass legislation supporting Second Amendment rights instead of trying to restrict or undermine Americans’ constitutional rights,’ the resolution says.

During oral arguments over the state’s previous law in November 2021, the justices appeared to accept the state’s argument for continued individualized discretion to enforce ‘sensitive place’ weapon restrictions. Such a concept, however, was not an issue in that case. When the court ruled last week that it would not temporarily block the new law, conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito noted in a statement that the current case involves issues that have not been explored before.

‘The New York law at issue in this application presents novel and serious questions under both the First and the Second Amendments,’ the statement said.

Fox News’s Shannon Bream and Bill Mears contributed to this report.

Ronn Blitzer is a reporter for Fox News Digital covering politics and breaking news. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump says Facebook ‘needs us more than we need them,’ as campaign calls for reinstatement
next post
Karine Jean-Pierre mistakenly refers to Kamala Harris as ‘the president’ during press conference

You may also like

DNC’s hellish abortion rituals celebrate death, the party’s...

August 21, 2024

‘We are suffering’: Omar challenger rips Walz for...

August 9, 2024

Tennessee Senior Center Tamari Key Out for Season...

December 9, 2022

Indiana Planned Parenthood clinics suspend abortions as new...

August 2, 2023

Former Ohio Gov. Bob Taft weighs in on...

April 25, 2023

DAVID MARCUS: Trump’s Canada tariffs take toll on...

March 10, 2025

Arizona Middle School Teacher Resigns After Filming Pornographic...

November 28, 2022

Supreme Court to hear arguments in Trump presidential...

April 25, 2024

UN chief sounds the alarm amid fears over...

February 5, 2025

Democrat state rep calls Moms for Liberty members...

July 11, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Rescissions: A Small but Welcome Step Toward Spending Discipline

      June 5, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Why Navy ships should not be named for gay rights icons

      June 5, 2025
    • GREGG JARRETT: Biden, the ‘marionette president; and the case of the runaway autopen

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump Practically Bans Travel and Immigration from 12 Countries with Flimsy Security Justifications

      June 5, 2025
    • ‘He’s not a big factor’: Trump’s Senate allies dismiss Elon Musk’s calls to ‘kill the bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Fears grow that Tata Steel could be excluded from Starmer-Trump trade deal

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,523)
    • Stocks (3,127)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved