Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Georgia Supreme Court undecided on fate of appeals judge accused of ethical misconduct

by March 16, 2023
March 16, 2023
Georgia Supreme Court undecided on fate of appeals judge accused of ethical misconduct

The Georgia Supreme Court on Wednesday said it cannot decide yet whether to remove a state Court of Appeals judge accused of ethical misconduct and asked a judicial discipline panel to review the case further.

The three-member panel of the Judicial Qualifications Commission in January recommended that the state high court permanently remove suspended Court of Appeals Judge Christian Coomer. The panel’s report said he violated ethics rules on how a lawyer should treat a client and improperly used campaign funds for personal expenses.

The Supreme Court found that the panel made ‘at least two critical legal errors that prevent us from resolving the matter on this record.’ For that reason, it decided to send the case back to the panel ‘to make new findings in the light of the law as it actually exists, and to do so quickly.’

The Supreme Court said the panel made ‘two critical legal errors.’

First, it was wrong in its determination that the Judicial Qualifications Commission could pursue discipline for conduct occurring before a person becomes a judge or a judicial candidate, the opinion says.

Second, the high court justices wrote, the panel ‘failed to understand the circumstances in which the Constitution and our case law permits judicial discipline.’ The opinion says that actions taken outside of a judicial capacity ‘warrant discipline only when taken in bad faith.’ None of the counts against Coomer have to do with actions taken in a judicial capacity, and the panel’s report ‘was ambiguous as to whether it found the Judge Coomer acted with bad faith,’ the opinion says.

‘Intent was a matter of enormous dispute in this matter, and this Court is not well positioned to resolve the factual questions of intent that are crucial to determining whether discipline is constitutionally permitted,’ the opinion says.

For that reason, the high court wrote, it is sending the case back to the panel to resolve several questions. The justices instructed the panel to file a new report with the Supreme Court within 60 days.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Texas judge hearing abortion pill case appointed by Trump, revered by conservatives
next post
Mississippi Gov. Reeves vetoes 2 bills on health insurance

You may also like

Pete Hegseth on the Hill for another day...

December 6, 2024

Locking it up: Trump, Biden, expected to clinch...

March 12, 2024

‘I would never turn my back on President...

June 28, 2024

Scoop: Trump HHS secretary nominee RFK Jr to...

January 29, 2025

“I Don’t Even Know What That Is” –...

September 30, 2022

Turkish lawmaker who suffered heart attack after saying...

December 15, 2023

Trump’s convincing 2024 victory sets House GOP up...

December 30, 2024

NEW STUDY: 1 in 780 German Children Under...

October 21, 2022

DAVID MARCUS: ‘Hamilton’ cancels itself as the Left...

March 6, 2025

Elon Musk scraps with Chuck Schumer, suggesting the...

April 9, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Republican senator teams up with Democrat to push $15 per hour minimum wage plus annual inflation increases

      June 11, 2025
    • House of Lords AI summit at London Tech Week warns of ‘skills cliff edge’ threatening UK’s competitive future

      June 11, 2025
    • Tariff tensions force Spain’s food giants to seek markets beyond the US

      June 11, 2025
    • Sizewell C secures £14.2bn state boost – but energy savings won’t come for a decade

      June 11, 2025
    • Michelle Mone-linked PPE firm faces £122m high court battle with government

      June 11, 2025
    • Entrepreneur turned away from London Tech Week for bringing baby sparks industry backlash

      June 11, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,183)
    • Investing (2,027)
    • Politics (15,592)
    • Stocks (3,141)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved