Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

DOJ appeals to Supreme Court after court invalidates domestic violence restraining order gun ban

by March 19, 2023
March 19, 2023
DOJ appeals to Supreme Court after court invalidates domestic violence restraining order gun ban

The Department of Justice is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to allow a federal ban to remain in force that would prohibit people under domestic abuse restraining orders from having guns.

The Justice Department is seeking the intervention after a federal appeals court ruled last month that people with domestic violence restraining orders have a constitutional right to own guns.

‘More than a million acts of domestic violence occur in the United States every year, and the presence of a firearm increases the chance that violence will escalate to homicide,’ a Justice Department petition states.

The Supreme Court petition was posted to Twitter by Pepperdine University law professor Jake Charles Friday.

The national debate began after police in Texas found a rifle and a pistol at the home of a man who was the subject of a civil protective order that banned him from harassing, stalking or threatening his ex-girlfriend and their child. The order also banned him from having guns.

A federal grand jury indicted the man, who pled guilty. He later challenged his indictment, arguing the law that prevented him from owning a gun was unconstitutional.

At first, a federal appeals court ruled against him, saying it was more important for society to keep guns out of the hands of people accused of domestic violence than it was to protect a person’s individual right to own a gun.

But, last year, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a new ruling in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, that set new standards for interpreting the Second Amendment by saying the government had to justify gun control laws by showing they are ‘consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.’

The appeals court withdrew its original decision and decided to vacate the man’s conviction, ruling the federal law banning people subject to domestic violence restraining orders from owning guns was unconstitutional.

The decision came from a three-judge panel consisting of judges Cory Wilson, James Ho and Edith Jones. Wilson and Ho were nominated by former Republican President Trump. Jones was nominated by former Republican President Reagan.

Timothy Nerozzi is a writer for Fox News Digital. You can follow him on Twitter @timothynerozzi and can email him at timothy.nerozzi@fox.com

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump targeted: A look at probes involving the former president; from Stormy Daniels to Russia to Mar-a-Lago
next post
GOP lawmakers slam potential Trump indictment: ‘Third World Banana Republic lunacy’

You may also like

Following key wins, Trump poised for cabinet completion...

February 23, 2025

DOD closes think tank arm marred by ‘inefficiency’...

March 14, 2025

GOP senators rally behind Hegseth after Signal chat...

March 28, 2025

White House observes more countries opposing Israel as...

May 23, 2024

‘Apologists for terrorism’: House Republicans eviscerate far-left Dems...

June 10, 2024

Rep. Comer to Newsmax: Impeachable Offenses on Hunter’s...

October 4, 2022

Daily Recap Podcast 10-25-22: The Establishment is All-in...

October 25, 2022

FIX IS IN: Arizona Ballots Make Stop at...

November 12, 2022

Army suspends commander after Trump, Vance, Hegseth vanish...

April 21, 2025

Rep-elects erroneously share press releases saying they were...

January 4, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Gold set for steepest weekly drop in six months as trade fears ease and dollar strengthens

      May 16, 2025
    • Aviva warns against forcing UK pension funds to buy domestic assets

      May 16, 2025
    • Wireless Logic valued at £3.5bn as founder sells minority stake to General Atlantic

      May 16, 2025
    • UK business investment surges at fastest pace in two years, defying tax hike fears

      May 16, 2025
    • NatWest nears full reprivatisation as taxpayer stake falls below 1%

      May 16, 2025
    • Gabbard says Comey should be ‘put behind bars’ after picture allegedly ‘issuing a call to assassinate’ Trump

      May 16, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (7,974)
    • Investing (1,964)
    • Politics (15,241)
    • Stocks (3,085)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved