Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Spotlighting Protester Surveillance: FOIA Lawsuit Edition

by May 2, 2023
May 2, 2023

Patrick G. Eddington

This coming May 25 will mark three years since the murder of George Floyd by then‐​Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. That event sparked some of the largest political street protests since the Vietnam War era. In both cases, the federal government’s reaction was to increase domestic surveillance targeting the protesters. This time, however, two federal entities that did not exist during the 1960s protests were key players in responding to the national outcry over Floyd’s murder: the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

The public learned about the DEA’s role in the surveillance operation in June 2020 via the now‐​defunct Buzzfeed News:

The Drug Enforcement Administration has been granted sweeping new authority to “conduct covert surveillance” and collect intelligence on people participating in protests over the police killing of George Floyd, according to a two‐​page memorandum obtained by BuzzFeed News.

The authority in question, 21 U.S.C. § 878(a)(5), allows DEA agents to “perform such other law enforcement duties as the Attorney General may designate.” In this case “other law enforcement duties” clearly included surveillance and possibly other operations designed to monitor or even infiltrate groups protesting Floyd’s murder. That authority was supposed to have expired later in June 2020, but neither the AG’s office or the DEA have ever revealed whether the additional powers granted to DEA lapsed or were extended.

Almost a year after Buzzfeed News broke the DEA surveillance story, Gizmodo noted a DHS component, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) had employed Predator drone surveillance against protesters:

The incident inspired a debate about federal policing tactics and spurred some lawmakers to send letters to agencies demanding additional information about their practices. Amazingly, the CBP director at the time claimed the drones were not being used for spying but were instead merely “providing assistance to state and local [officials] so they could make sure that their cities and their towns were protected.”

The work by Buzzfeed and Gizmodo helped to highlight the roles of DEA and CBP in protest‐​related surveillance, but many questions about the scope, duration, and effects of that surveillance (and possibly other counterprotest actions) remain unanswered. This week, Cato took a step towards getting those answers by filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits against DEA and CBP–both of which have stonewalled Cato’s FOIA requests for nearly three years. We expect a fight from both agencies to keep as many of those records as possible secret, and we’ll provide updates on these cases as they occur.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Sector Spotlight: Strong Seasonal Sector Rotation
next post
Brace Yourself: The Debt Ceiling is Now on the Horizon

You may also like

Tariffs and Agriculture: Reaping What You Sow?

May 5, 2025

Citizen Initiatives Must Be Able to Overcome Government...

July 20, 2023

New Survey: Private School Enrollment Grew from the...

March 26, 2024

On the Nippon Steel-US Steel Deal, Politics (Again)...

March 15, 2024

Did Tax Cuts Cause Rising Deficits?

July 5, 2023

The FBI Puts Victims of Civil Forfeiture through...

November 8, 2024

“Suppression” or No, Most Voting‐​Law Changes Don’t Alter...

July 21, 2023

SNAP and Obesity

May 3, 2023

The Senate Plan Is a Trap—House Lawmakers Shouldn’t...

April 8, 2025

Pro-Brazilian Censors Strike Back: Digital Sovereignty Versus Free...

September 25, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

      June 27, 2025
    • Trump secures record-shattering $1.4B for political war chest; will be ‘dominant force’ for GOP in midterms

      June 27, 2025
    • Trump says ‘big, beautiful’ bill ‘must’ meet deadline as some Republicans waver

      June 27, 2025
    • Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

      June 27, 2025
    • The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

      June 27, 2025
    • Barrett eviscerates Jackson, Sotomayor takes on a ‘complicit’ court in contentious final opinions

      June 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,329)
    • Investing (2,080)
    • Politics (15,837)
    • Stocks (3,174)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved