Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Why Lower Civics and U.S. History Scores? Maybe Just Less Emphasis on Testing

by May 3, 2023
May 3, 2023
Why Lower Civics and U.S. History Scores? Maybe Just Less Emphasis on Testing

Neal McCluskey

The latest 8th grade National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) civics and U.S. history scores are out, and they have been dropping since 2014. This will no doubt spur lamentations about the state of our kids and our democracy, and, all things equal, we should want to see scores on these tests going up rather than down. But maybe the situation isn’t as dire as it might seem.

As with all NAEP scores, there is a limit to what we can determine about the state of American education from them (especially in a hot take like this blog post). But it might be worth considering a simple proposition: we have seen drops in NAEP scores since 2013 and 2014 (depending on the years of test administration) because the No Child Left Behind Act heavily emphasized standardized testing and was replaced by the much less test‐​centric Every Student Succeeds Act in 2015. Maybe standardized testing has just become less of an emphasis since NCLB.

The following charts of various NAEP tests all show peaks around 2013–2014.

U.S. history

Civics (Peak in 2014, though the drop by 2018 was not statistically different)

Math (Most recent results from 2022)

Reading (Also most recent 2022)

Of course, changing federal policy is not the only factor in scores – state policies, local policies, changing culture, economic conditions, and much more are at play. And it is quite likely that both COVID-19 learning disruption, and the increasing political and social radioactivity of history and civics, are at work. But looking at several subjects, and just applying a little Occam’s razor, this seems like a pretty reasonable suspect.

Perhaps the big policy question is whether falling standardized test scores should lead to major education policy revisions. I think the answer is no.

For one thing, as I touched on briefly in writing about the boom in universal school choice, there is some evidence that standardized test scores are poor predictors of outcomes we’d like to see from education, such as higher lifetime earnings and better health. It might also be that students simply do not care about NAEP – it is taken only by a nationally representative sample of children and has no ramifications for either the kids or their schools. And when it comes to civics and U.S. history, keep in mind that the latest scores are for 8th graders, who might be too young to see a lot of relevance of the subjects to their lives. Most are four or five years from voting, and history can seem really, really distant and irrelevant when you are only 13 or 14 years old. And as Bryan Caplan has shown, even if test scores are high, we tend to retain little of what we’ve ever learned.

It is better if kids know our history and understand how our system of government works than if they don’t. But if higher test scores were largely a product of teaching to tests or, worse, testing strategies versus knowledge, then we weren’t really getting what we wanted. And if we retain little of what we learn, higher test scores might not ultimately translate into more knowledgeable or active citizens.

So while it’s reasonable to be concerned about dropping tests scores, it is also important to be calm, and not let panic drive policy, especially toward relatively quick, centralized “solutions” such as an expensive federal civics and history initiative, or something like that. If anything, research points to decentralization, repeatedly finding that private schools produce more knowledgeable and tolerant citizens than public, controlling for factors like family income. But we have that lesson regardless of the latest NAEP results, which, by the way, also do not include private school scores.

There is, indeed, a big limit to what NAEP scores tell us.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Secrets of Success: Naomi Bacon, Founder of Tandem Collective
next post
SVB Reports From the Fed and FDIC Reveal Regulators Long Knew of Problems

You may also like

Don’t Put a Tariff on Barbie: Global Trade...

May 23, 2025

Trump’s School Discipline Executive Order: Both Right and...

April 24, 2025

Join Us in Person or Online, Sept. 12...

September 6, 2024

Major EU Regulator Threatens Free Social Media by...

April 23, 2024

Bill Kristol Backs a Bad, Old Idea

August 1, 2023

Clean Energy Subsidies vs. a Carbon Tax

January 22, 2024

Election Policy Roundup

April 1, 2025

What Is the Opportunity Cost of State AI...

June 10, 2025

The Crypto Tax Rules Proposed by Senators Lummis...

July 28, 2023

Increased Medicaid Coverage Is Not Improving Low Birth...

June 13, 2023

Don’t Put a Tariff on Barbie: Global Trade...

May 23, 2025

Trump’s School Discipline Executive Order: Both Right and...

April 24, 2025

Join Us in Person or Online, Sept. 12...

September 6, 2024

Major EU Regulator Threatens Free Social Media by...

April 23, 2024

Bill Kristol Backs a Bad, Old Idea

August 1, 2023

Clean Energy Subsidies vs. a Carbon Tax

January 22, 2024

Election Policy Roundup

April 1, 2025

What Is the Opportunity Cost of State AI...

June 10, 2025

The Crypto Tax Rules Proposed by Senators Lummis...

July 28, 2023

Increased Medicaid Coverage Is Not Improving Low Birth...

June 13, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Democratic doctors’ protest against Trump’s ‘beautiful bill’ derailed by flood of US Capitol tourists

      July 2, 2025
    • Missed Disney’s Rally? Grab This Defined-Risk Put Spread for a Second Chance

      July 2, 2025
    • Market Signals Align – Is a Bigger Move Ahead?

      July 2, 2025
    • MACD Crossovers: Why Most Traders Get It Wrong

      July 2, 2025
    • Should You Buy Roblox Stock Now? Key Levels to Watch

      July 2, 2025
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court decides abortion case that prompted most expensive judicial election in US history

      July 2, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,365)
    • Investing (2,094)
    • Politics (15,918)
    • Stocks (3,187)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved