Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

School Districts Sue Over the “Nuisance” of Online Speech

by May 10, 2023
May 10, 2023

Walter Olson

I’ve got a new opinion piece at Ricochet about a particularly disturbing new lawsuit campaign:

According to education site The 74, at least eleven school districts around the country have sued the owners of such platforms as Snap, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok seeking financial compensation for the “increased mental health services and training they’ve ‘been forced’ to establish” as a consequence of student use of social media.… Cash demands aside, the schools say they want to negotiate a settlement with the platforms to change how they operate.

The cited article is from March, and I’m told that the number of suits filed around the country is now approaching 100. Plaintiff school districts include those of Seattle, San Mateo County (Calif.), and Mesa (Arizona). I write:

These are bad lawsuits that courts should reject. The suits’ announced goal (regulating social media use by students) is in itself debatable, but the means employed (damage lawsuits to recoup public agency expenditures) vaults the whole thing into the realm of the absurd.

I cite Jennifer Huddleston’s Cato briefing paper of last month, which convincingly rebuts the idea that there is some straightforward way to child‐​proof social media that does not result in the squelching of large amounts of wholesome speech, including speech by adults.

A typical suit in this new genre can’t actually point to much in the way of violations of existing statute, especially given the role of Section 230, which broadly bars platform liability for user speech. 

Instead it falls back on the notion, not a part of the historic civil law, that social media is a “public nuisance” – earlier lawsuits in the recoupment genre have tried out this idea on guns, fossil fuels, vaping, opioids, you get the picture – as well as newly posited “duties of care” meant to precipitate tort negligence liability from thin air plus indignation.

The Supreme Court has twice made clear that laws meant to child‐​proof aspects of the Internet can be unconstitutional on the grounds that they punish or chill too much speech. Declaring speech a “nuisance” is not a permissible way to end‐​run the First Amendment.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
R.I.P. Newton Minow
next post
The Ord Oracle May 9, 2023

You may also like

Maritime Protectionism Continues to Plague Offshore Wind Development

May 30, 2023

Will Incumbents Block Innovations in Veterinary Health Care...

July 29, 2024

Another Athlete Chooses a Low‐​Tax State

July 10, 2023

When Does Speech Threaten Officials? From Washington, a...

February 21, 2025

Air Traffic Control: It’s Management, Not Money

May 20, 2025

Leave Child Tax Credit Expansion to the States

February 19, 2025

Election Policy Roundup

April 1, 2025

Some Simple Facts about U.S. Government Debt

July 10, 2023

The Draft Is Antithetical to Liberty, Even if...

October 21, 2024

The Drug War Is Failing, So Let’s Try…...

March 10, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Unmasking Medicaid Money-Laundering Schemes: Medicaid Financing Gimmicks 101

      June 27, 2025
    • Top moments from the Trump-Biden debate that changed the course of the 2024 election

      June 27, 2025
    • Trump exerted ‘maximum pressure’ on Iran and Israel to ‘deliver peace’: Leavitt

      June 27, 2025
    • Iranian foreign minister reiterates ‘serious damage’ to nuclear facilities, despite ayatollah’s comments

      June 27, 2025
    • Maybe Most People Do Not Want Teacher-Led Public School Prayer—But They Do Want Chaplains

      June 27, 2025
    • Flashback: The debate night against Trump that threw Biden’s reelection campaign into a free fall

      June 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,329)
    • Investing (2,076)
    • Politics (15,829)
    • Stocks (3,173)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved