Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

How the World Trade Organization Can Get Its Groove Back

by May 30, 2023
May 30, 2023

James Bacchus

In this, the third year of his presidential term, President Joe Biden is clearly not making trade—much less trade liberalization—a priority. For the most part, his trade policy is a less strident echo of that of his predecessor, Donald Trump, and, in trade, his has been, as I have previously described it, the reign of polite protectionism. To the extent that he and his administration are negotiating on trade at all, they are negotiating trade deals that cannot truly be called trade deals. Witness the recent announcement of a supply chain coordination agreement with 13 other countries as the first tangible result of the administration’s initiative for an Indo‐​Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF). Coordinating operations to safeguard against supply chain disruptions is clearly desirable. So, too, are the administration’s professed goals of making trade, as U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai puts it, promote “sustainability, resiliency and inclusiveness.” But what of the goal of making more trade? This does not seem to be among the president’s goals. Yet, doing so could help attain the administration’s stated goals while also creating economic gains for the American people that will not otherwise be made.

Not surprisingly, a large coalition of prominent US business groups have expressed their reservations about a purported trade deal in IPEF that does not lower existing barriers to trade by cutting tariffs, streamlining regulatory standards, or providing new protections for the intellectual property that is a huge part of the value of the goods and services exported by the United States. Fearful of Congressional opposition to a trade deal that would reduce U.S. tariff “protections”, and fearful, too, of the possible political consequences of the obvious Asia‐​Pacific solution for the United States of simply re‐​joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans‐​Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), the president and his advisers are trying, in trade, to make something out of not much more than nothing. What they describe as a “new” approach to trade is not one that makes a priority of lowering barriers to trade. Indeed, based on the evidence so far, the Biden administration seems bent on maintaining and increasing the protectionist barriers erected by the United States that constrain the growth of trade.

For what I think the United States should be seeking globally in trade, see my new Cato Policy Analysis, “The Future of the WTO: Multilateral or Plurilateral?”.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Sector Spotlight: Will Tech Take a Seasonal Break in June?
next post
The Continuing Effort to Deny that Libertarian‐​ish Voters Exist

You may also like

Colombia Should Legalize Adult Marijuana Use Today

June 15, 2023

President Biden’s Magical Thinking in the Middle East

June 10, 2024

Fed Dot-Plot Forecasting Fiascos: June 2008 and June...

August 1, 2024

Friday Feature: Roots Academy

November 17, 2023

Tariffs, Uncertainty, and Small Businesses

March 14, 2025

What is Causing Nicotinophobia?

January 23, 2024

Congress Investigates Debanking, Reintroduces (Un)Fair Access

February 11, 2025

3.8 Million Middle Eastern or North Africans in...

September 27, 2023

Concerned About Learning Loss? Let Funding Follow Students

December 11, 2023

Social Security Benefits Are Growing Too Fast

September 21, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump warns Rand Paul he’s playing into ‘hands of the Democrats’ with ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ opposition

      June 1, 2025
    • White House urges Iran to accept nuclear deal as IAEA reports uranium enrichment spike

      June 1, 2025
    • Israel hostage deal in doubt as Hamas adds demands, US envoy calls terms ‘unacceptable’

      May 31, 2025
    • Iran condemns Austria over report on advanced nuclear weapons program

      May 31, 2025
    • Michelle Obama facing backlash over claim about women’s reproductive health

      May 31, 2025
    • Hamas agrees to release 10 more hostages

      May 31, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,105)
    • Investing (2,000)
    • Politics (15,453)
    • Stocks (3,119)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved