Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

How the World Trade Organization Can Get Its Groove Back

by May 30, 2023
May 30, 2023

James Bacchus

In this, the third year of his presidential term, President Joe Biden is clearly not making trade—much less trade liberalization—a priority. For the most part, his trade policy is a less strident echo of that of his predecessor, Donald Trump, and, in trade, his has been, as I have previously described it, the reign of polite protectionism. To the extent that he and his administration are negotiating on trade at all, they are negotiating trade deals that cannot truly be called trade deals. Witness the recent announcement of a supply chain coordination agreement with 13 other countries as the first tangible result of the administration’s initiative for an Indo‐​Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF). Coordinating operations to safeguard against supply chain disruptions is clearly desirable. So, too, are the administration’s professed goals of making trade, as U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai puts it, promote “sustainability, resiliency and inclusiveness.” But what of the goal of making more trade? This does not seem to be among the president’s goals. Yet, doing so could help attain the administration’s stated goals while also creating economic gains for the American people that will not otherwise be made.

Not surprisingly, a large coalition of prominent US business groups have expressed their reservations about a purported trade deal in IPEF that does not lower existing barriers to trade by cutting tariffs, streamlining regulatory standards, or providing new protections for the intellectual property that is a huge part of the value of the goods and services exported by the United States. Fearful of Congressional opposition to a trade deal that would reduce U.S. tariff “protections”, and fearful, too, of the possible political consequences of the obvious Asia‐​Pacific solution for the United States of simply re‐​joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans‐​Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), the president and his advisers are trying, in trade, to make something out of not much more than nothing. What they describe as a “new” approach to trade is not one that makes a priority of lowering barriers to trade. Indeed, based on the evidence so far, the Biden administration seems bent on maintaining and increasing the protectionist barriers erected by the United States that constrain the growth of trade.

For what I think the United States should be seeking globally in trade, see my new Cato Policy Analysis, “The Future of the WTO: Multilateral or Plurilateral?”.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Sector Spotlight: Will Tech Take a Seasonal Break in June?
next post
The Continuing Effort to Deny that Libertarian‐​ish Voters Exist

You may also like

Public Schooling Culture War Cooled Considerably in 2024

January 16, 2025

The War on Prices Continues: Biden’s Misguided Rent...

April 1, 2024

Are Police-Worn Body Cameras Useful?

August 25, 2023

In 1932-33 Leading Intellectuals Used ‘Dictatorial’ as a...

September 21, 2023

Mississippi’s Age Verification Law Could Impact Us All

August 21, 2025

Only 48 Percent of Employment-Based Green Cards Went...

November 25, 2024

Justice Delayed: Federal Indigent Defense Funding Crisis Continues

August 13, 2025

The United States Remains a Manufacturing Powerhouse

October 25, 2023

Ten Years of the Human Freedom Index

December 17, 2024

When Hayek Came to Cato

December 1, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Barclays exits Entercard joint venture with £200m sale to Swedbank

      August 28, 2025
    • Is Trump considering bold Africa play to push back on China, Russia and Islamic terrorists?

      August 28, 2025
    • ‘Gender bonus bias’ revealed as men nearly 1.5 times more likely to receive bonuses than women

      August 28, 2025
    • Four in five online small businesses expect growth despite UK economic headwinds

      August 28, 2025
    • Tesla sales slump 42% in Europe as BYD overtakes market share

      August 28, 2025
    • “XRP Futures Hit $1B — WinnerMining Cloud Mining Shows You How to Earn $1,850 a Day”

      August 28, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,908)
    • Investing (2,246)
    • Politics (16,504)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved