Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Will AI ever be smart enough to decipher federal regulations?

by June 1, 2023
June 1, 2023
Will AI ever be smart enough to decipher federal regulations?

A federal agency is pondering whether artificial intelligence might someday be used to help the government identify duplicative or overly burdensome federal rules that need to be cut back.

But officials are already hearing from skeptics who doubt AI will ever be powerful enough to wade through and understand the hundreds of thousands of pages of detailed federal rules.

The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is an independent federal agency that works to increase the efficiency and fairness of regulations. In early May, ACUS released a report it commissioned on how AI and other algorithmic tools might be used to conduct retrospective reviews of federal rules to improve them.

That report said AI might already be able to conduct ‘housekeeping’ chores, such as finding typos or incorrect citations but said AI might also be trained to do much more.

‘A tool could identify regulations that are either outdated or redundant with another rule,’ the report said, even as it acknowledged the challenges of this work. ‘Both of these inquiries may not have an objective correct answer: A regulation might be old, but is it obsolete? A rule’s text or regulated activity might overlap with another’s, but is one superfluous?

‘An algorithm performing even more substantive tasks might identify existing regulations it believes could benefit from clarification or are overly burdensome,’ it added. ‘These are both arguably completely subjective inquiries: When is a regulation too complex or burdensome?’

The report quoted several federal staffers, most of whom were open to using AI for retrospective regulatory reviews.

But it also quoted groups affected by federal regulations, and they were much more tentative on how AI might be used. Most said that, at best, AI would be a tool for flagging rules that are ready to be reviewed, after which people would have to do the reviewing.

Two ‘skeptics’ in this group argued that AI would have trouble penetrating the dense language of federal rules to be useful in any way.

‘According to the skeptics, it would be nearly impossible to write an all-encompassing algorithm that would be accurate to flag rules in need of review given that so much of regulatory text is incredibly difficult to unpack and is so context-specific,’ the report said.

‘The concern raised was that so much of the regulatory quality depends on agency expertise and experience. The representatives were skeptical that AI could replace or even channel this.’

The report said another possible hurdle is whether government officials will want to use AI this way. The Trump administration introduced the use of AI in the regulatory process as a deregulatory tool in the Department of Health and Human Services and used AI in the Defense Department to help people understand the Pentagon’s vast network of rules.

The two ‘skeptics’ said the Trump administration’s use of AI may have ‘poisoned the well’ and could make it difficult for agencies to agree to explore AI further.

‘One representative went further to elaborate that it ‘soured the community’s thinking about retrospective review’ given that it used retrospective review ‘as a smokescreen for partisan objectives,’’
the report said.

Several federal agencies are represented in ACUS, and the group’s research director, Jeremy Graboyes, told Fox News Digital there is some hesitancy inside the government on how to use AI.

‘I think you probably see a range of emotions,’ Graboyes said, noting that the positives of cost-effectiveness and accuracy are potentially outweighed by problems like possible bias that can be built into AI systems. ‘All the debates you’re seeing outside the government, you’re seeing inside government as well.’

ACUS is recommending that federal agencies start by using AI to identify redundant federal rules and fixing small errors and by using open-source AI tools for this work. ACUS also said agencies should disclose when they use AI or other algorithmic tools in the process of reviewing regulations.

ACUS is set to meet in mid-June in Washington to decide whether to adopt the report and its recommendations. From there, Graboyes said ACUS would be working with federal agencies on implementing these recommendations, which he said was a start that could lead the agency to recommend more advanced work with AI tools in the years ahead.

‘We’ll be doing more work in the AI space,’ he said.

Pete Kasperowicz is a politics editor at Fox News Digital.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Toys ‘R’ Us returns to high street with new WH Smith partnership
next post
Nearly 10K photos from Hunter Biden’s laptop hit the web: ‘Truth and transparency’

You may also like

The Shocking News Related to Two of the...

December 12, 2022

Russia to Call for UN Investigation of US...

October 26, 2022

Tucker Carlson: Tony Blinken’s Statement Is an Admission...

October 4, 2022

‘DOGE boys’: Dems fume over spending cut spree...

February 10, 2025

JUST IN: Multiple People Hospitalized After Building Explosion...

September 20, 2022

FEC complaint alleges coordinated disinformation campaign from Biden’s...

November 10, 2023

New Trump-aligned committee chair pledges ‘colonoscopy’ of State...

December 11, 2024

JUST IN: Recount Confirms GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert...

December 13, 2022

PA Supreme Court Justice Debra Todd to be...

January 20, 2023

GP Daily Recap 9-23-22: FOIA Suggests Bill Barr...

September 23, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Jeremy Hunt: ‘We’re over-medicalising anxiety and depression with sick notes’

      August 2, 2025
    • Cambodia to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for role in ending country’s conflict with Thailand

      August 2, 2025
    • WATCH: Trump says he is hopeful Hillary Clinton will be investigated for election fraud

      August 1, 2025
    • Trump moves nuclear submarines weeks after praising sub’s power in Iran strikes

      August 1, 2025
    • Recess on ice as Republicans hunker down for high-stakes nominee blitz

      August 1, 2025
    • Iran says it has ‘plenty of scientists’ left to restart uranium enrichment, despite US, Israeli strikes

      August 1, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,652)
    • Investing (2,168)
    • Politics (16,282)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved