Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

New York’s legal bid to redraw House map could decide control of chamber

by June 9, 2023
June 9, 2023
New York’s legal bid to redraw House map could decide control of chamber

Lawyers argued in favor of redrawing New York’s congressional map Thursday before a state appeals court. A victory for the plaintiffs in the Democrat-backed suit may mean reinstating a brutal gerrymander that was struck down last year.Should Democrats attempt to reinstate their original map, up to seven Republican representatives — including Michael Lawler, Nicole Malliotakis and George Santos — could face near-unwinnable battles for re-election.Republicans have slammed the suit as an attempted partisan power-grab. ‘[The plaintiffs’] goal here, if they win, would be to put this case back in the backrooms of Albany and in D.C., so they can gerrymander the state,’ Former Republican Rep. John Faso said of the case.

Lawyers seeking redrawn congressional lines in New York argued before a state appeals court Thursday in a Democrat-backed lawsuit that could have implications in the 2024 fight for control of the House.

The lawsuit was brought on behalf of 10 New York voters who want a state redistricting commission to submit new proposed state congressional lines for 2024. A victory for the plaintiffs would scrap lines drafted for 2022 by an outside expert after a legal challenge. Republicans were able to flip four congressional seats in New York under those lines.

Democrats who support the lawsuit said they want to ensure that a state commission approved by voters prior to the 2022 election, to draw political maps, gets to fulfill its constitutional duty. Republicans accused Democrats of seeking a political advantage.

‘Their goal here, if they win, would be to put this case back in the backrooms of Albany and in D.C., so they can gerrymander the state,’ former Republican Rep. John Faso said after the arguments in the appellate division of the state Supreme Court.

New York’s political maps for 2022 were supposed to have been drawn by the state’s Independent Redistricting Commission, a body made up of equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans. But the commission failed to reach a consensus and the Democrat-controlled Legislature stepped in and created its own maps.

The Legislature’s maps would have given Democrats a strong majority of registered voters in 22 of the state’s 26 congressional districts. Republicans accused the Democrats of gerrymandering.

After a court challenge, New York’s highest court ruled the Legislature lacked the authority to redraw the lines. The Court of Appeals handed authority to draw new district maps to an expert, who drew up more competitive congressional districts.

Republicans were able to gain seats in New York under those maps, including one held by Democratic Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, who ran the House Democrats’ campaign arm. The Republican romp in New York came even as Democrats ran stronger than expected nationally.

Republicans currently hold a 222-213 edge over Democrats in the House.

The voters filed a lawsuit last year against the commission and its members, alleging violations of the state Constitution’s redistricting commission provisions. They seek to compel the commission to submit new proposed congressional lines.

A state trial court judge in Albany rejected the request in September.

In April, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul and State Attorney General Letitia James jointly filed a friend-of-the-court brief in favor of legal action.

The voters’ lawyer told the five-judge panel Thursday that the redistricting process approved by voters was never completed.

‘The IRC indisputably did not meet the constitutionally mandated duty it had to draw the congressional map,’ attorney Aria Branch told the judges.

Lawyers who want to keep the 2022 maps argued that they are constitutional and should remain in place for the rest of the decade.

The case is expected to ultimately be decided by the state Court of Appeals.

<!–>

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
–>

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump indicted on federal charges related to document handling and obstruction of justice
next post
What are workplace injuries and what are your rights?

You may also like

Magnitude 6.0 Earthquake Strikes Mexico City

December 11, 2022

Kirby dodges answering point-blank if Biden believes Netanyahu...

March 18, 2024

Muhammad/Mohammed/Mohammad Top Baby Boy Name in UK

October 11, 2022

Hunter Biden probe: 2022 marked fourth year —...

January 3, 2023

House Budget chairman explains why there’s no ‘pork’...

June 6, 2025

Elon Musk slated to speak at Trump pre-inauguration...

January 17, 2025

India launches strikes on terrorist camps in Pakistan

May 6, 2025

Biden says Palestinians ‘deserve a state of their...

November 19, 2023

Trump eyes control of Ukraine’s nuclear plants as...

March 22, 2025

Dead raccoon left for Oregon mayor, Black official...

June 7, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump, lawmakers react after ‘big, beautiful bill’ clears Senate hurdle

      June 29, 2025
    • How Staff Can Strengthen HIPAA Compliance and Security

      June 29, 2025
    • Lotus denies plans to close Hethel factory amid US expansion talks

      June 29, 2025
    • Top university degrees lose sway as tech employers prioritise job-ready skills

      June 29, 2025
    • Government urges supermarkets to make healthy food more appealing in bid to tackle obesity crisis

      June 29, 2025
    • Senate Republicans ram Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ through key test vote

      June 29, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,334)
    • Investing (2,081)
    • Politics (15,854)
    • Stocks (3,177)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved