Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

House Republicans narrowly pass controversial defense bill

by July 15, 2023
July 15, 2023
House Republicans narrowly pass controversial defense bill

‘We’re cutting the woke out of the military,’ declared Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. ‘Getting this country back on a conservative basis.’

 ‘I think it’s demoralizing to our troops when you see one of our leaders up there in a dress, or they’re doing these drag shows,’ offered Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn.

Conservatives believe the battlefield may be inside the Pentagon. Republicans aimed to give ‘woke’ policies in the armed forces a dishonorable discharge in this year’s defense policy bill.

 ‘My amendment would ban CRT – Critical Race Theory – from any military instruction,’ bragged Rep. Michael Waltz, R-Fla.

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Tex., went a step further.

 ‘We’re focused on building a national defense and a military that is focused on blowing things up and killing people. N on social engineering wrapped in a uniform,’ said Roy.

The House Armed Services Committee approved an initial version of the annual defense plan, 58-1. 

That package may have passed on the floor with a coalition of Democrats and Republicans. For 62 years, lawmakers approved the defense bill on a bipartisan basis. 

But that may not be the case this year.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., only has a four seat majority. So McCarthy let conservatives have their say on this legislation – even if those priorities may not wind up in the final version.

House members filed a staggering 1,500-plus amendments to the annual defense policy bill. Live amendments on the floor to legislation is an organic process. No one quite knows what amendments will pass or fail. And, in circumstances like these, it’s hard to track if a bill has the necessary votes. That’s because the underlying measure metamorphoses in real time on the floor. Changing and updating, contingent upon the adoption or failure of amendments. That means lawmakers who were for the bill before may not like how the measure evolved. Of course, another cadre of lawmakers suddenly flip to yea because the bill now contains provisions more palatable to them.

There wasn’t a lot of debate about missiles and troops in this year’s defense bill. But once the amendments hit, it was all about abortion, transgender surgeries and diversity initiatives.

‘We’re voting to get rid of this left-wing, socialistic, woke agenda,’ declared Rep. Mike Collins, R-Ga., on the floor. ‘Now we can get back to protecting the citizens of this country.’

Conservatives aimed to prohibit service members from using the military’s health plan to pay for transgender treatments. There was an effort to restrict books with ‘radical gender ideology’ in military libraries. Burchett authored an amendment to require those who identify as men to register for the draft.

‘If these folks want to be treated like man, they need to act like men,’ said Burchett.

That said, Burchett’s plan never received formal consideration on the floor.

But no other issue loomed as large as a conservative effort to slash reimbursements for troops or those under the military health care system umbrella to seek abortions across state lines.

‘It feels like House Republicans want to live in the 1950s,’ said House Democratic Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar, D-Calif.

There was worry the military culture clash could crash the entire defense bill. Some Republicans fretted that the conservative social policy issues went too far.

‘We were told we’re not going to mess with women traveling out of state. What we are we doing this week? NDAA? Potentially messing with women who are traveling out of state,’ said Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C. ‘We have a chance to show compassion to women this week. And I really just hope we don’t screw it up. I hope we don’t drop the ball.’

Yet despite Mace’s consternation about the abortion plan, she seemingly reversed course to support the very abortion amendment in question.

‘Research told me today, and looking at the amendment and the legislation, it didn’t have to do with the women getting time off after they’ve had the procedure. The military doesn’t reimburse travel for elective procedures as a general policy rule,’ said Mace.

When pressed further, Mace noted that the abortion provision wasn’t ‘going to pass the Senate anyway. It doesn’t matter.’

Democrats honed in on the abortion question.

‘It’s gone,’ said Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee. ‘If Republicans insist that it has to be in it, then we will not have (a defense policy bill) this year. If by some unbelievable miracle the Senate allowed that to go through, Biden would veto it.’

Democrats excoriated the GOP for inclusion of the amendment.

‘This is an insult to all who serve – particularly women – in uniform.,’ fumed Rep. Pat Ryan, D-N.Y., an Army veteran and West Point graduate. ‘They’re being told your service and willingness to risk your life – we don’t care. You don’t get health care services. You don’t get reproductive health care services. This is un-American.’

Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., characterized the legislation as a ‘culture war document.’

The House eventually approved the package 219-210. The social issue amendments courted the votes of skeptical conservatives. Four Republicans voted nay. Four Democrats voted yea. More Democrats would have voted yea had the legislation not veered so far from center.

‘The far right hijacked this hijacked our national security,’ declared Ryan. 

The House Rejected an amendment by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., to curb money for Ukraine. But Greene still voted yes. That’s because McCarthy tapped Greene to serve on a conference committee, negotiating the final version of the bill with the Senate.

‘That allows me to go and be a voice in the room to talk about removing money going to Ukraine,’ said Greene.

But Democrats reminded Republicans that the House version isn’t the final say.

‘We are going to cut out the cancer that the extreme Republicans have put in the National Defense Authorization Act,’ said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. He characterized some of the provisions as ‘malignant.’

But House conservatives warn the bill better not change too much from the current form or they may balk.

 ‘Striking that balance ought to be a whole lot closer to our position than just defaulting to whatever the Senate says,’ said Chip Roy.

Conservatives are watching McCarthy closely. They remember that he cut a deal with Democrats and President Biden on the debt ceiling in the spring. More Democrats voted for that package than Republicans.

 This means McCarthy could face a new headache with a ‘must-pass’ bill very soon.

Chad Pergram currently serves as a senior congressional correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC). He joined the network in September 2007 and is based out of Washington, D.C.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Cruz shoots down Schumer effort to regulate AI: ‘More harm than good’
next post
How this onetime battleground state in heartland America turned bright red

You may also like

Arkansas Gov. Sanders names new director of Parks...

June 14, 2023

Trump inauguration performer Gavin DeGraw salutes ‘businessman running...

January 23, 2025

FBI Refuses to Return Security Camera Footage of...

September 30, 2022

Missouri’s new senator vows to fight ‘overzealous’ Biden...

January 19, 2023

BREAKING: Italy Elects Its First Female and Populist...

September 25, 2022

Biden admin withholding key funding for schools with...

July 28, 2023

Iranian woman strips down in anti-hijab protest following...

November 3, 2024

AOC dodges question on lack of border visits...

September 6, 2023

Karine Jean-Pierre Absurdly Claims Real Disposable Income is...

October 11, 2022

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino: James Comey ‘brought...

May 18, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Silver’s Surge is No Fluke—Here’s the Strange Ratio Driving It

      June 6, 2025
    • Friday Feature: Incubate Debate

      June 6, 2025
    • Risch urges ‘top to bottom’ USAID spending review after waste, fraud exposed

      June 6, 2025
    • Universities in Libertarian Land

      June 6, 2025
    • Elon Musk may speak to Trump aides in push to calm feud

      June 6, 2025
    • Everyone Talks About Leaving a Better Planet for Our Children: Why Don’t We Leave Better Children for Our Planet?

      June 6, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,149)
    • Investing (2,013)
    • Politics (15,545)
    • Stocks (3,131)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved