Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

‘Husband,’ ‘wife’ scrubbed from federal law under House Democrat bill, replaced with ‘spouse’

by July 18, 2023
July 18, 2023
‘Husband,’ ‘wife’ scrubbed from federal law under House Democrat bill, replaced with ‘spouse’

New legislation proposed in the House would remove the words ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ from federal law and replace them with a range of terms such as ‘spouse.’

The ‘Amend the Code for Marriage Equality Act,’ introduced by California Democrat Julia Brownley, seeks to amend a number of existing laws by striking the terms ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ from their text. The proposed legislation moves to substitute the words with phrases such as ‘a married couple,’ ‘married person’ and ‘person who has been, but is no longer, married to’’ depending on the context.

‘Although the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples have the right to marry, there are many instances where the U.S. Code does not respect that constitutional right,’ Brownley said in a statement released on Friday.

‘Now more than ever, with an extreme Supreme Court and state legislatures rolling back the rights of the LGBTQ community, it is imperative that Congress showcases its commitment to supporting equality,’ she continued. ‘This common-sense bill will ensure that our federal code reflects the equality of all marriages by recognizing and acting upon the notion that the words in our laws have meaning and our values as a country are reflected in our laws.’

Federal laws targeted for amendment in Brownley’s bill include the ‘Ethics in Government Act of 1978,’ the ‘Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993’ and the ‘Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971,’ among others.

Fox News Digital contacted Brownley’s office for additional comment but did not hear back in time for publication.

A recent Supreme Court ruling in a case that pitted the interests of LGBTQ non-discrimination against First Amendment freedom was seen by the left as a blow to LGBTQ+ rights that amplified calls to expand the court.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the majority, along with Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in the 6-3 decision in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. Sotomayor called the ruling ‘a new license to discriminate,’ arguing that the ‘symbolic effect of the decision is to mark gays and lesbians for second-class status.’

She mentioned a number of instances of anti-LGTBQ discrimination and violence in her opinion. Justice Neil Gorsuch dismissed Sotomayor’s dissent by saying it ‘gets so turned around about the facts that it opens fire on its own position.’

He added that it is ‘difficult to read the dissent and conclude we are looking at the same case.’

Fox News’ Brianna Herlihy contributed to this report.

Pete Kasperowicz is a politics editor at Fox News Digital.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Sector Spotlight: Latest Drop in US Dollar Sending Markets Higher
next post
In the Senate, time is paramount

You may also like

Joe Biden Caught on a Hot Mic Speaking...

October 5, 2022

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee has passed away after...

July 20, 2024

UK Officials Rap Pfizer CEO Over Dishonest and...

November 27, 2022

“I’ve Never Passed Out in My Life” –...

October 17, 2022

Cop-Hating Marxist in Seattle Begs for Police Protection...

October 18, 2022

Israel launches 10,000th airstrike against Hamas, as Palestinians...

December 5, 2023

Texas to Deploy Military Tanks to Various Locations...

November 19, 2022

Eric Schwerin confirms Joe Biden used ‘Robinware456’ email...

March 19, 2024

John Kerry Spills the Beans at U.N.’s COP27...

November 11, 2022

Sen. Paul says Fauci deserves prison for COVID-19...

January 16, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Patel touts FBI’s dozens of convictions in $250 million Minnesota COVID scam

      July 18, 2025
    • Three Stocks in Focus: One Old Favorite, One Mag Name, and a Dow Comeback Story

      July 18, 2025
    • Don’t Hate the Player, Hate the Income Tax for Wrecking Health Care

      July 18, 2025
    • State Department says 59,000 tons of food assistance are in motion after reports of incinerated aid

      July 18, 2025
    • Pentagon to probe Microsoft’s use of Chinese engineers on sensitive defense systems, Hegseth says

      July 18, 2025
    • GOP senator reveals the ‘dirty’ secret to Trump’s Make America Healthy Again movement

      July 18, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,524)
    • Investing (2,134)
    • Politics (16,113)
    • Stocks (3,218)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved