Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

A Link Tax Won’t Save the Newspaper Industry But It Might Just Ruin the Internet

by August 14, 2023
August 14, 2023
A Link Tax Won’t Save the Newspaper Industry But It Might Just Ruin the Internet

Paul Matzko

My policy analysis of the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA) is now online.

In a nutshell, the JCPA and similar link taxes in California, Canada, and Australia would be a government‐​mandated cross‐​subsidy from Big Tech to Big Ink. And while link tax proponents say they want to save small, local newspapers from bankruptcy, the actual link tax bargaining mechanism would primarily benefit larger, regional newspapers that have already found a solid footing in the digital marketplace. Instead of saving local newspapers, a link tax would perversely fuel further consolidation in the news industry.

Worse yet, a link tax would create a radical and novel quasi‐​property right in information that targets the basic infrastructure of the modern internet. We take it for granted today, but the “web” in “world wide web” is a reference to the billions of hyperlinks that seamlessly and costlessly bind together discrete websites from around the world into an interconnected whole.

A link tax introduces friction and cost into that process by asserting that those wanting to merely link to the web address of news content need paid permission. It’s a form of digital enclosure, taking information that was once “free as the air to common use” and putting it behind a wall.

While a link tax may return some financial value to the newly endowed rights holder, it will create a far larger informational deadweight loss on consumers. A link tax would mean fewer news articles from fewer newspapers reaching fewer consumers.

The JCPA is a bad idea, but state‐​level “baby link taxes” like that which recently passed the California Assembly (and is awaiting a State Senate hearing) could be even worse:

California’s proposed link tax, the CJPA, would cause that fragmentation to run even deeper. Not only would we see the further devolution of the World Wide Web into various Nation Wide Webs, but the internet in the United States might end up being fractured into 50 different instances, some with aggregated access to news and some without, and 50 different compensation schemes. Were this kind of state‐​by‐​state regulation of the internet to pass muster under the Commerce Clause — which remains to be seen — it would create a precedent for additional transfers from tech companies to favored local industries. Such a patchwork approach to internet regulation would be a recipe for disaster for American predominance in online innovation. It would be ironic if California, the home of Silicon Valley and a birthplace of the modern internet, were ultimately responsible for that failure.

For more, check out the full analysis here.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Australian Study on Opioid Prescribing is the Latest to Challenge the False Narrative About the Cause of the Overdose Crisis
next post
Argentines Are All Peronists No Longer

You may also like

The Supreme Court Grapples with Free Speech Scrutiny

January 16, 2025

Great Moments in “Buy America”

July 21, 2023

If Student Loans Are Removed From the Department...

April 1, 2025

NAEP Is Worth Exploring, But Educational Freedom Is...

January 29, 2025

Friday Feature: Academy of Creatives

June 20, 2025

Lessons from Honolulu’s New Train System

July 7, 2023

Speech Codes and Commissions Trample on the Expressive...

May 30, 2024

David Boaz: A Life Well Lived

June 7, 2024

Friday Feature: Bramblewood Learning Community

August 18, 2023

Unintended Consequences of Vaccine Mandates: Good Intentions Are...

March 4, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Government to appeal High Court ruling forcing closure of Epping migrant hotel

      August 22, 2025
    • Trump DOJ to begin handing over Epstein files to House Oversight investigators

      August 22, 2025
    • OnlyFans pays record £520m to Ukrainian-born owner as $8bn sale looms

      August 22, 2025
    • Government takes control of Sanjeev Gupta’s Rotherham steel plant to save 1,500 jobs

      August 22, 2025
    • TikTok isn’t enough to stop Gen Z from drifting to AOC. Trump must do 3 things next

      August 22, 2025
    • JCB warns of huge losses as new US tariffs hit British exports

      August 22, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,855)
    • Investing (2,231)
    • Politics (16,459)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved