Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

A Link Tax Won’t Save the Newspaper Industry But It Might Just Ruin the Internet

by August 14, 2023
August 14, 2023
A Link Tax Won’t Save the Newspaper Industry But It Might Just Ruin the Internet

Paul Matzko

My policy analysis of the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA) is now online.

In a nutshell, the JCPA and similar link taxes in California, Canada, and Australia would be a government‐​mandated cross‐​subsidy from Big Tech to Big Ink. And while link tax proponents say they want to save small, local newspapers from bankruptcy, the actual link tax bargaining mechanism would primarily benefit larger, regional newspapers that have already found a solid footing in the digital marketplace. Instead of saving local newspapers, a link tax would perversely fuel further consolidation in the news industry.

Worse yet, a link tax would create a radical and novel quasi‐​property right in information that targets the basic infrastructure of the modern internet. We take it for granted today, but the “web” in “world wide web” is a reference to the billions of hyperlinks that seamlessly and costlessly bind together discrete websites from around the world into an interconnected whole.

A link tax introduces friction and cost into that process by asserting that those wanting to merely link to the web address of news content need paid permission. It’s a form of digital enclosure, taking information that was once “free as the air to common use” and putting it behind a wall.

While a link tax may return some financial value to the newly endowed rights holder, it will create a far larger informational deadweight loss on consumers. A link tax would mean fewer news articles from fewer newspapers reaching fewer consumers.

The JCPA is a bad idea, but state‐​level “baby link taxes” like that which recently passed the California Assembly (and is awaiting a State Senate hearing) could be even worse:

California’s proposed link tax, the CJPA, would cause that fragmentation to run even deeper. Not only would we see the further devolution of the World Wide Web into various Nation Wide Webs, but the internet in the United States might end up being fractured into 50 different instances, some with aggregated access to news and some without, and 50 different compensation schemes. Were this kind of state‐​by‐​state regulation of the internet to pass muster under the Commerce Clause — which remains to be seen — it would create a precedent for additional transfers from tech companies to favored local industries. Such a patchwork approach to internet regulation would be a recipe for disaster for American predominance in online innovation. It would be ironic if California, the home of Silicon Valley and a birthplace of the modern internet, were ultimately responsible for that failure.

For more, check out the full analysis here.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Australian Study on Opioid Prescribing is the Latest to Challenge the False Narrative About the Cause of the Overdose Crisis
next post
Argentines Are All Peronists No Longer

You may also like

US Sugar Protectionism Raises the Price of Holiday...

December 20, 2023

Biden’s Corporate Welfare Bonanza

March 27, 2024

Is the Federal Transit Administration Fighting Climate Change...

October 25, 2024

Friday Feature: Onward Learning

October 11, 2024

Resist the Allure of Laffer Curve Logic

November 21, 2023

Government Debt Varies Widely by State

July 19, 2024

Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics: A Misleading Study...

January 2, 2024

SCOTUS Upholds a Tax on Stock Ownership in...

June 20, 2024

Five Most Absurd Things about Trump’s “Reciprocal” Tariffs

April 3, 2025

Populism and the Future of the Fed: A...

July 29, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • WATCH: Trump says he is hopeful Hillary Clinton will be investigated for election fraud

      August 1, 2025
    • Trump moves nuclear submarines weeks after praising sub’s power in Iran strikes

      August 1, 2025
    • Recess on ice as Republicans hunker down for high-stakes nominee blitz

      August 1, 2025
    • Iran says it has ‘plenty of scientists’ left to restart uranium enrichment, despite US, Israeli strikes

      August 1, 2025
    • No, Tariffs Are Not Similar to Consumption Taxes Like a VAT

      August 1, 2025
    • Trump repositions 2 nuclear submarines after ‘highly provocative’ Russian comments

      August 1, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,651)
    • Investing (2,168)
    • Politics (16,281)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved