Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

ISO: U.S. Trade Policy for Countries Other Than China

by September 1, 2023
September 1, 2023
ISO: U.S. Trade Policy for Countries Other Than China

Scott Lincicome

These days, much of Official Washington has turned its back on freer trade, and China is their reason why. According to the Washington Post, for example, President Biden has “reject[ed] the trade liberalization doctrine that held sway for nearly three decades after the Cold War’s end,” and when asked about the president’s motivations, an anonymous “senior U.S. official” pointed to a Reuters/​Ipsos survey showing that “66 percent of respondents said they were more likely to back a presidential candidate in 2024 who favored ‘additional tariffs on Chinese imports.’ ”

On the other side of the aisle, the Wall Street Journal reported this week that China has motivated several GOP presidential candidates’ turn against new trade agreements and their nationalist support “for boosting domestic manufacturing, even through government subsidies.” Former President Trump has even gone so far as to propose a tariff “ring” on all imports.

As my Cato colleague Clark Packard and I argued in a recent paper, there’s surely a better approach to U.S.-China relations than the clumsy bellicosity both political parties have recently embraced. But it’s especially wrongheaded for U.S. policymakers to let China — which does raise unique challenges — dictate overall U.S. trade policy, given that the vast majority of U.S. trade is conducted with people in countries other than China.

In particular, the latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis show that less than 11 percent of all U.S. trade — imports and exports, goods and services — was with China in 2022.

The numbers for goods trade (i.e., what would get caught up in a global tariff war started by Trump’s “ring”) are a little different, but tell the same general story: China is a big U.S. trading partner but the vast majority of U.S. trade in goods in 2022 involved non‐​China countries.

Even for just U.S. imports of goods, these other countries accounted for more than 83 percent of the total last year:

As I explained in a new column at The Dispatch, Trump’s global tariff is a bad idea for lots of reasons, and the starting point for that analysis is the fact that it would mainly hit countries other than China. (If recent experience is any guide, in fact, a global tariff could give Chinese imports a leg up in the U.S. market.) The same goes for broad‐​based protectionism that President Biden and other policymakers are pushing, which is no more “China policy” than Trump’s (very bad) tariff idea.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Waldeck Partner With The University Of Lincoln To Keep Top Talent In Lincoln
next post
Financial Regulators’ Open-Source Crackdown Sets Bad Precedent for AI, DeFi, and Innovation

You may also like

Sweden during the Pandemic: Pariah or Paragon?

August 29, 2023

CBDC vs. Crypto: What’s the Difference?

May 31, 2023

Fact-Check: Taxes on the Rich

March 7, 2024

Don’t Let Electricity Become the New Front in the...

April 5, 2024

Larry Summers’ Comparison of 2013–23 Inflation with 1966–76...

August 25, 2023

A US Sovereign Wealth Fund and Tariffs

March 12, 2025

Election Policy Roundup

April 1, 2025

To Head Off Strongman Governance, Keep Presidential Power...

January 31, 2024

Federal Housing Tax Credit: 2,060 Pages of Brutal...

March 19, 2024

Universal Savings Accounts to Help Families Build Wealth

May 22, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • America’s Not-So-Secret Secret Police

      August 7, 2025
    • Poll: Nearly 1 in 4 Americans Think They Have a Personal Social Security Account

      August 7, 2025
    • Republican senator claims RFK Jr. mRNA vaccine decision undermines Trump agenda

      August 7, 2025
    • Who is Anita Dunn? The Biden confidante who clashed with Hunter grilled in House autopen probe

      August 7, 2025
    • Case v. Montana Brief: Limit Loopholes to the Fourth Amendment

      August 7, 2025
    • Trump opens $9tn US retirement market to crypto in landmark executive order

      August 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,704)
    • Investing (2,184)
    • Politics (16,333)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved