Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Supreme Court asked to decide if police dog committed an illegal search by putting paws on car

by September 6, 2023
September 6, 2023
Supreme Court asked to decide if police dog committed an illegal search by putting paws on car

Petitioners are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a case in which they claim a police K-9 officer violated the Constitution by jumping up and placing its paws on a vehicle during a traffic stop.

The case relates to Nero, a Belgian Malinois working as a police dog in Idaho. Nero uncovered meth residue and other drug paraphernalia during a search, but he also briefly jumped and placed his front paws onto the door of a car, which petitioners argue violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against ‘unreasonable searches.’

The driver of the car, Kirby Dorff, was ultimately convicted on charges of felony drug possession. The Idaho Supreme Court tossed out Dorff’s conviction in March, however, arguing that Nero’s pounce onto the door constituted a ‘warrantless search.’

Court records say police first pulled over Dorff after he made an erratic turn across three lanes of traffic in 2019. Nero arrived with his handler shortly after, and made two circuits around Dorff’s vehicle. Nero jumped up several times during the second circuit.

After finding evidence of drug possession in the vehicle, police obtained a warrant to search Dorff’s motel room, where they found more evidence, according to USA Today.

Idaho’s Supreme Court found in a 3-2 ruling that while police K-9s are free to sniff the air around a given vehicle, they are not allowed to attempt to get inside the vehicle without a warrant.

The court compared the situation to ‘the difference between a dog’s tail that brushes against the bumper of your vehicle as it walks by — and a dog who, without privilege or consent, approaches your vehicle to jump on its roof, sit on its hood, stand on its window or door.’

Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court decide among themselves which cases to hear each term.

The high Court ruled in 2013 that it is unconstitutional for police to bring a drug search dog onto a suspect’s property without a search warrant.

Anders Hagstrom is a reporter with Fox News Digital covering national politics and major breaking news events. Send tips to Anders.Hagstrom@Fox.com, or on Twitter: @Hagstrom_Anders.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
It’s Really All About the Retail Sector Now
next post
AOC dodges question on lack of border visits under Biden, touts tours of ‘New York-area facilities’

You may also like

Jordan evacuates sick and injured Palestinian children from...

June 11, 2025

Tim Scott pledges to finish wall in visit...

August 5, 2023

Vivek Ramaswamy preps for upcoming Republican debate with...

August 22, 2023

DAVID MARCUS: As Springsteen and De Niro trash...

May 16, 2025

Vermont Girls Volleyball Team Banned from Its Own...

October 2, 2022

Biden offers apology to Muslim-American leaders for questioning...

November 27, 2023

Is Nancy Pelosi a ‘Beard’? Does this Explain...

October 30, 2022

The long line of the papacy: Francis’ death...

April 22, 2025

Why Won’t Democrats Debate “America First” Republicans like...

October 24, 2022

Maine Legislature approves budget addendum that includes 12-week...

July 7, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • How to Run a Successful Personal Injury Law Firm?

      July 31, 2025
    • Let liberals lose their minds over Sydney Sweeney while I go jeans shopping

      July 31, 2025
    • Corporate law and securities regulation in the UK

      July 31, 2025
    • Government to impose toughest late payment laws in the G7

      July 31, 2025
    • How Modular Classrooms Are Supporting SEN Pupils with Calm, Comfortable Spaces

      July 31, 2025
    • Inside Biden confidante Steve Ricchetti’s ‘combative’ eight-hour grilling in House Oversight cover-up probe

      July 31, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,627)
    • Investing (2,162)
    • Politics (16,254)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved