Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Campus ‘Bias Response Teams’ Stifle Free Expression

by September 22, 2023
September 22, 2023
Campus ‘Bias Response Teams’ Stifle Free Expression

Thomas A. Berry

Virginia Tech has instituted a “bias‐​related incidents” policy, under which students may be referred to a “Bias Response Team.” Under the policy, students can be referred for violating a standard as vague as “words or actions that contradict the spirit of the Principles of Community.” Students can also run afoul of the policy for “unwelcome jokes” or for even being present when jokes are made and failing to report them.

Students are encouraged to report each other while speculating on the “bias” that may have motivated their peers’ opinions. The school has given itself jurisdiction over activities and speech both on and off campus, as well as on students’ social media and other digital platforms.

Virginia Tech students on campus in Blacksburg, VA. (Getty Images)

Speech First sued Virginia Tech on behalf of several current Tech students, arguing that this policy chilled their freedom to express sincere but controversial views and thus violated the First Amendment. Yet a federal district court declined to enjoin the policy, holding that the students did not suffer any First Amendment injury because the bias response teams could not themselves impose formal discipline.

The Fourth Circuit affirmed that holding, and Speech First has now asked the Supreme Court to take the case. Cato has joined the Liberty Justice Center in an amicus brief supporting Speech First’s petition.

In the brief, we recount the history of bias response teams on many campuses across the country and how such teams do in fact chill the free expression and exchange of ideas. Whether or not bias response teams can impose formal discipline, the imbalance of power inherent in their proceedings and the ability of such teams to potentially refer students for formal discipline unquestionably lead students to self‐​censor.

That is the case here: students at Virginia Tech have muffled their own controversial political and social views because they feared the very real consequences of being referred to the bias response teams. Students know that if they are referred, the university will log the allegation in its records, share the “biased” speech with others, call the students in for educational and restorative “interventions,” and possibly refer their case to disciplinary authorities.

Virginia Tech’s policy is strikingly reminiscent of a state law struck down by the Supreme Court in Bantam Books v. Sullivan (1963). In that case, Rhode Island had created a “Commission to Encourage Morality in Youth,” which investigated books deemed potentially obscene or indecent. If the Commission found a book to be “objectionable,” it mailed a notice to the publisher thanking it in advance for quashing the book. Although the Commission had no authority to actually punish a publisher, the Supreme Court held that it nonetheless suppressed speech and violated the First Amendment. As the Court noted, “people do not lightly disregard public officers’ thinly veiled threats.”

When Virginia Tech students find themselves called before a bias response team, they too face thinly‐​veiled pressure to stifle their expression. As Bantam Books explained, that is enough to establish a First Amendment injury. The Supreme Court should take the case, reverse the Fourth Circuit, and vindicate the speech rights of Virginia Tech students.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
India Poised to Scrap its Jones Act
next post
S&P 500 Head and Shoulders Top Confirmed

You may also like

Illegal Immigrants Have a Low Homicide Conviction Rate:...

February 28, 2024

Populism and the Future of the Fed: A...

July 29, 2022

What Trump Has Done and Imminently Plans to...

February 3, 2025

The Right to Control Your Property Is Fundamental

April 11, 2025

Collecting Jurisdiction: The SEC’s Wrongheaded Expansionary Approach to...

October 5, 2024

New Evidence Underscores the Value of Tobacco Harm...

July 16, 2025

Freight Rail Safety in the Year Since the...

February 6, 2024

Government Versus Private Vaccine Mandates

March 5, 2025

Friday Feature: St. Thomas Aquinas Tutorial

October 18, 2024

Is China a Threat to the Fed? A...

August 15, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Debanking Order Calls for Investigation, Something Tennessee Should Have Done

      August 7, 2025
    • $93 million in aid to fight malnutrition headed to 12 African countries, Haiti, State Dept says

      August 7, 2025
    • $93 million in aid to fight malnutrition headed to 12 African countries, Haiti, State Dept says

      August 7, 2025
    • America’s Not-So-Secret Secret Police

      August 7, 2025
    • Poll: Nearly 1 in 4 Americans Think They Have a Personal Social Security Account

      August 7, 2025
    • Republican senator claims RFK Jr. mRNA vaccine decision undermines Trump agenda

      August 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,704)
    • Investing (2,185)
    • Politics (16,335)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved