Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Reinstating ‘Net Neutrality’ Is to Ignore Reality

by September 29, 2023
September 29, 2023
Reinstating ‘Net Neutrality’ Is to Ignore Reality

Thomas A. Firey

Usually, when some government proposal is floated in D.C., it should be evaluated with careful, sober policy analysis. But in the case of the Federal Communications Commission’s new “net neutrality” push to more‐​or‐​less reinstate regulations that were repealed a half‐​decade ago, an old internet meme suffices:

If you don’t remember net neutrality, it prohibited internet service providers (ISPs) from treating some data streams differently than others, typically by either charging more or limiting the delivery speeds for, say, high‐​definition movies from outside the ISP. Regulation supporters claimed that all data streams should be treated the same. ISPs and other internet infrastructure providers responded that if they were to provide more and better services for heavy users, they should be able to charge those users higher prices or moderate their use.

Net neutrality supporters predicted that, if the internet companies got their way, disaster would result. Among the foretold parade of horribles: the rise of a vicious ISP cartel, wide‐​ranging internet censorship and loss of privacy, and the end of internet innovation and perhaps even the internet itself. For a sense of these apocalyptic visions, check out some editorial cartoons from the time.

But the internet companies won the political fight, net neutrality was repealed and … the World Wide Web continued on. In fact, most users didn’t realize that anything had changed. And a few years later, when a large chunk of American life suddenly moved online because of the COVID pandemic, the nation had a more built‐​out internet to handle the flood of electronic commerce, virtual education, and home entertainment.

Unfortunately, policymakers often do not react rationally when their ideas are disproven by reality; hence the FCC’s new net neutrality push. The same thing is happening at the Federal Trade Commission and the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, where policymakers are undaunted by their string of false predictions of doom from specific corporate mergers and acquisitions.

To learn more about net neutrality, see this summary of articles on the topic that have appeared in my journal, Regulation, and the work of my Cato colleagues.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Crude Oil Disagreeing with the Canadian Dollar
next post
New York’s Hate Speech Law Violates the First Amendment

You may also like

Why Is Federal Spending Expanding as a Share of...

July 20, 2023

Does Austin Need an $8 Billion Light Rail...

October 31, 2024

As Policymakers Begin to Crack Down on Xylazine...

May 8, 2024

New Data on Trump’s Border Security Record: Releasing...

October 30, 2024

Why Germany Should Preserve Its Debt Brake and...

September 19, 2024

Friday Feature: MCP Academy

May 9, 2025

Friday Feature: Saint Joseph Academy

November 4, 2024

Immigration Restrictions Prevent Mutually Beneficial Exchange

September 22, 2023

Tobacco Harm Reduction Opponents Should “Consider the Conterfactual”

August 23, 2024

Vermont Poised to Join the Grassroots Uprising Against...

January 11, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Rescissions: A Small but Welcome Step Toward Spending Discipline

      June 5, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Why Navy ships should not be named for gay rights icons

      June 5, 2025
    • GREGG JARRETT: Biden, the ‘marionette president; and the case of the runaway autopen

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump Practically Bans Travel and Immigration from 12 Countries with Flimsy Security Justifications

      June 5, 2025
    • ‘He’s not a big factor’: Trump’s Senate allies dismiss Elon Musk’s calls to ‘kill the bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Fears grow that Tata Steel could be excluded from Starmer-Trump trade deal

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,523)
    • Stocks (3,127)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved