Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Inclusionary Zoning and Affordable Housing

by November 17, 2023
November 17, 2023
Inclusionary Zoning and Affordable Housing

Peter Van Doren

What can be done to increase the supply of affordable housing? The traditional answer in Blue states has been inclusionary zoning, a policy that mandates that new housing developments price a small percentage of units at less than the market. The New York Times recently profiled a new inclusionary zoning development in Montgomery County, Maryland, one of the jurisdictions that invented the policy in the early 1970s.

Inclusionary zoning is superficially attractive to voters and elected officials because it isn’t “public housing” and thus does not have an explicit budget that is visible to taxpayers. And the rhetoric that surrounds the policy suggests that it simply makes developers do the right thing:

In the decades since Montgomery County passed the housing ordinance, the idea that developers should provide affordable housing in every kind of building and neighborhood, once regarded as a wild notion pushed by volunteer activists, has spread around the country. It is known as “inclusionary zoning” and has become a staple of many cities’ housing policy.

But regardless of the positive rhetoric that suggests the benefits that flow from good government mandates, inclusionary zoning is a tax on new housing that is also attached to a spending program on rent reduction that is off budget. The irony, of course, is that a tax on new housing reduces its supply and thus increases its price. This understanding is not new. More than thirty years ago a colleague and I asked why tax the supply of a commodity (housing) whose supply you intend to increase?

Previously I have described two alternatives to inclusionary zoning. The first is filtering: reduce zoning constraints on new construction and allow the effects of the increased new supply to “filter down” to existing units whose owners have to reduce price to maintain occupancy. Recent evidence suggests the benefits from filtering are real. The second is payments to incumbent low‐​density homeowners to gain their acceptance of increased density and affordability.

Allowing local governments to convert the current in‐​kind, opaque, underground market for zoning change into an explicit legal exchange of cash for density would facilitate the development of housing and reduce prices. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
ProPublica Profiles Army Corps Failures
next post
Statement by Mario Vargas Llosa and Leading Latin American Democrats in Support of Javier Milei

You may also like

Unmasking Medicaid Money-Laundering Schemes: Medicaid Financing Gimmicks 101

June 27, 2025

Another Adverse Effect of the US-China Trade War

September 11, 2024

Friday Feature: St. Thomas Aquinas Tutorial

October 18, 2024

Affordable Housing: Subsidies Raise Costs

March 20, 2024

Major EU Regulator Threatens Free Social Media by...

April 23, 2024

A Pro-Expression and Innovation Agenda for the New...

December 3, 2024

On the Expansion of Executive Power: Addendum

May 20, 2025

Tariffs, Uncertainty, and Small Businesses

March 14, 2025

‘De-Globalization’ Still Isn’t Happening (At Least Not Yet)

February 6, 2025

Brasilia-Washington Tech Policy Connections

November 5, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Debanking Order Calls for Investigation, Something Tennessee Should Have Done

      August 9, 2025
    • The Ivy faces legal challenge from waiter over share of tips and service charges

      August 9, 2025
    • Smarter mining, more stable returns: RICH Miner launches convenient cloud mining app supporting XRP and BTC

      August 9, 2025
    • Sydney Sweeney jeans controversy making advertising great again

      August 9, 2025
    • Nagasaki mayor issues chilling warning on 80th anniversary of atomic bombing

      August 9, 2025
    • MIKE DAVIS: Eric Tung is Trump’s pick to bring sanity to the Ninth Circuit

      August 9, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,730)
    • Investing (2,191)
    • Politics (16,347)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved