Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

In 2023, Colorado Lawmakers Pushed Back on Cops Practicing Pain Medicine Based on Flawed CDC Guideline

by November 20, 2023
November 20, 2023
In 2023, Colorado Lawmakers Pushed Back on Cops Practicing Pain Medicine Based on Flawed CDC Guideline

Jeffrey A. Singer

Few people noticed—the press didn’t cover it much—but Coloradans in pain and the clinicians who treat them got relief this legislative session when Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed SB 144 into law last May. The bill revised an earlier statute that had placed restrictions on how clinicians treat chronic pain. The new law, which removed those restrictions, went into effect in August.

Like the majority of states, Colorado placed limits on the dosage and amount of opioids clinicians can prescribe to patients in pain, effectively enshrining in law the flawed 2016 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for treating pain. Responding to criticism from physicians, pharmacologists, and addiction specialists who argued, among other things, that the CDC’s morphine milligram equivalent conversion tables were junk science, the CDC revised its guideline in 2022. Unfortunately, the revised pain‐​prescribing guideline has hardly any more basis in the evidence than the original. And though the agency stressed that it is not intended as a mandate, policymakers will likely interpret it that way.

In SB 144, Colorado lawmakers returned the clinical decision‐​making process to clinicians. Lawmakers also recognized the fallacy of using morphine milligram equivalent conversion tables to govern how clinicians treat individual patients. The following are among the bill’s provisions:

A HEALTH-CARE PROVIDER ACTING IN GOOD FAITH AND BASED ON THE NEEDS OF THE PATIENT WITH A DIAGNOSED CONDITION CAUSING CHRONIC PAIN IS NOT SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE FROM THE REGULATOR SOLELY FOR PRESCRIBING A DOSAGE THAT EQUATES TO AN UPWARD DEVIATION FROM MORPHINE MILLIGRAM EQUIVALENT DOSAGE RECOMMENDATIONS OR FROM THRESHOLDS SPECIFIED IN STATE OR FEDERAL OPIOID PRESCRIBING GUIDELINES OR POLICIES.
A HEALTH-CARE PROVIDER TREATING A PATIENT WITH CHRONIC PAIN…SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO TAPER A PATIENT’S MEDICATION DOSAGE SOLELY TO MEET A PREDETERMINED MORPHINE MILLIGRAM EQUIVALENT DOSAGE RECOMMENDATION OR THRESHOLD IF THE PATIENT IS STABLE AND COMPLIANT WITH THE TREATMENT PLAN AND IS NOT EXPERIENCING SERIOUS HARM FROM THE LEVEL OF MEDICATION CURRENTLY BEING PRESCRIBED OR PREVIOUSLY PRESCRIBED. A DECISION TO TAPER OR MAINTAIN MEDICATION MUST INCLUDE AN INDIVIDUALIZED ASSESSMENT OF THE PATIENT’S CURRENT MEDICAL CONDITION AND TREATMENT PLAN, THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF MAINTAINING OR TAPERING THE PATIENT’S MEDICATION, AND A DISCUSSION WITH THE PATIENT.
A PHARMACY, CARRIER, OR PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGER SHALL NOT HAVE A POLICY IN PLACE THAT REQUIRES THE PHARMACIST TO REFUSE TO FILL A PRESCRIPTION FOR AN OPIATE ISSUED BY A HEALTH-CARE PROVIDER WITH THE AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE OPIATES SOLELY BECAUSE THE PRESCRIPTION IS FOR AN OPIATE OR BECAUSE THE PRESCRIPTION ORDER EXCEEDS A PREDETERMINED MORPHINE MILLIGRAM EQUIVALENT DOSAGE RECOMMENDATION OR THRESHOLD.
A HEALTH-CARE PRACTICE OR CLINIC IN WHICH A HEALTH-CARE PROVIDER IS AUTHORIZED TO PRESCRIBE…SHALL NOT HAVE A POLICY IN PLACE THAT REQUIRES THE HEALTH-CARE PROVIDER TO REFUSE TO PRESCRIBE, ADMINISTER, OR DISPENSE A PRESCRIPTION FOR AN OPIATE SOLELY BECAUSE THE PRESCRIPTION EXCEEDS A PREDETERMINED MORPHINE MILLIGRAM EQUIVALENT DOSAGE RECOMMENDATION OR THRESHOLD.

While I appreciate and agree with the spirit behind the last two provisions, I don’t think lawmakers should mandate what policies private clinics, pharmacies, or pharmacy benefit managers choose to institute. However, Colorado’s lawmakers and governor deserve credit for unshackling clinicians who are trying to help their patients who are in pain and for tacitly repudiating morphine milligram equivalent junk science.

SB 144 should improve patients’ access to pain management. It isn’t the only step Colorado has taken this session to increase access to care. Earlier this year, Governor Polis signed into law HB 1071, making Colorado the sixth state to expand access to mental health care by removing barriers to psychologists prescribing.

Colorado’s lawmakers and governor deserve praise for these reforms.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
EB Weekly Market Report – Monday, November 20, 2023
next post
This Stock Hit a 52-Week High — And It’s Still Surging

You may also like

The National Security Bureaucracy Is Unwell

November 21, 2023

More Evidence That Opioid Policymakers Keep Aiming at...

May 30, 2023

House GOP Pushes Back Against OECD

May 26, 2023

“Housing First” Homeless Policy Gets a Critical Look

June 30, 2023

Temporary Tax Extenders Are Still Bad Policy

November 30, 2023

Supreme Court Clarifies Murky “Waters of the United...

May 26, 2023

San Francisco Loses Tens of Millions of Dollars...

September 12, 2023

School Supply Lists Include SROs. Is That a...

September 19, 2023

Will Nicolás Maduro Invade Guyana?

December 5, 2023

300 Years Later, Adam Smith Is Still Indispensable

June 16, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Rishi Sunak’s ‘eat out to help out’ scheme to come under scrutiny at Covid inquiry

      December 11, 2023
    • UK Government’s review on payments and cash flow a ‘step forward’

      December 11, 2023
    • UK insolvencies rising due to high interest rates, says Begbies Traynor

      December 11, 2023
    • Which ‘out of officer’ are you? How stress-free will your Christmas holiday really be?

      December 11, 2023
    • US multinationals underpaid at least £5.6bn in tax in UK last year, HMRC believes

      December 11, 2023
    • Regulator warms train ticket websites over lack of transparency over pricing

      December 11, 2023

    Categories

    • Business (3,920)
    • Investing (647)
    • Politics (8,832)
    • Stocks (1,771)
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy policy
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2023 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved