Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Appeal decision finds Haribo’s gummy bear figurative trade mark distinctive

by November 27, 2023
November 27, 2023
Appeal decision finds Haribo’s gummy bear figurative trade mark distinctive

The Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has reversed the refusal of Haribo’s figurative trade mark consisting of an image of its ‘Goldbear’ gummy bear on the basis that the mark does satisfy the minimum degree of distinctiveness.

Rigo Trading S.A, a holding company for Haribo, the well-known German confectionery company, filed an application for an international registration designating the EU for a figurative mark of its HARIBO ‘Goldbear’ for a range of non-edible goods in Classes 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28 including amongst other things clothing, jewellery and games.

Emily Roberts, partner in the Intellectual Property team at independent UK law firm Burges Salmon  explains that the mark was refused for the majority of the goods in the application on the basis that it was considered to be devoid of distinctive character.

The examiner found that the appearance of the mark was already commonly used for decorative, artistic and aesthetic purposes for the contested goods. In support of its reasoning, the examiner provided various examples of other gummy bear shaped products and goods bearing gummy bear decoration on the market within the same classes as those applied for, including gummy bear shaped hairclips, a gummy bear shaped coin purse and a bag with a gummy bear decoration.

The examiner considered that the mark would be perceived as a commonplace depiction of a gummy bear as either a decorative element, the shape of the goods themselves or of their packaging, and as a result the mark did not meet the minimum degree of distinctive character necessary to function as a trade mark.

Board of Appeal decision

Haribo appealed the refusal and it came before the Fourth Board of Appeal of the EUIPO.

Overturning the refusal, the Board confirmed that a trade mark is considered to possess sufficient distinctive character if it is capable of enabling the relevant public to identify the origin of the goods which it covers and to distinguish them from those of other undertakings.

The Board considered that the sign, a gummy bear or a characterised figure of an animal, had no connection with the contested goods. Further, that the sign conveyed an overall impression that is unrelated to the likely or customary appearance of these goods. The mere fact that some of the contested goods may take the shape of a gummy bear is not in itself sufficient to establish that the mark consists a representation of the shape of the goods at issue.

In reviewing the examples of gummy bear shaped/decorated products provided by the examiner, the Board determined that the examples were not sufficient to demonstrate that it was an established practice of the relevant market sectors of the contested goods to offer gummy bear shaped items, or that the relevant public would perceive a gummy bear as a common motif.

The Board considered that the sign was not excessively simple and banal but included distinct characteristics, such as the positioning of the ears and the smile, which would create a visual impact on the relevant consumers. The Board also emphasised that originality and novelty are not relevant when considering the distinctive character of a mark.

As a result, the Board reversed the examiner’s decision and held that the sign had at least the minimum degree of distinctive character necessary to be protected as a trade mark in the European Union.

Key takeaways

The decision will be welcomed by brand owners. It confirms that when assessing the distinctiveness of a figurative mark, it is not necessary for a sign to be novel or original. Further, even if there are instances of decorative use or product shapes which are similar to a sign, this is not sufficient in itself to support a finding of non-distinctiveness. If a sign enables consumers to distinguish those goods from others on the marketplace, that is sufficient.

Read more:
Appeal decision finds Haribo’s gummy bear figurative trade mark distinctive

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Week Ahead: NIFTY Likely To Continue To Consolidate; May Stay Within The Broad Trading Range
next post
Secrets of Success: Dr Ed Gladman, CEO Adlington Retirement Living

You may also like

UK and Spain emerge as top investment destinations...

July 18, 2024

Next buys collapsed Made.com in £3.5m deal

November 9, 2022

Consumers rein in spending as confidence falls to...

October 24, 2022

Thousands of firefighters and control room staff will...

September 6, 2022

Zendo Energy raises £1.75M to help data centres...

May 12, 2025

CBI finds its voice again with a low...

November 21, 2023

Post-lockdown jobs boom ‘is over’ as employers worry...

September 30, 2022

Estée Lauder to axe up to 7,000 jobs...

February 6, 2025

Ministers pressed to address workforce health as UK...

February 24, 2025

How to Choose the Best Fax App for...

May 30, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Debanking Order Calls for Investigation, Something Tennessee Should Have Done

      August 9, 2025
    • MIKE DAVIS: Eric Tung is Trump’s pick to bring sanity to the Ninth Circuit

      August 9, 2025
    • How Europe’s car industry can survive the Chinese EV challenge

      August 9, 2025
    • Hiring Software & JavaScript Developers: Skills, Costs, and Best Practices

      August 9, 2025
    • Rakhi Butani on Skincare, Cooking, and the Power of Balance

      August 9, 2025
    • Jeremy Clarkson warns of ‘catastrophic’ UK harvest as farmers battle extreme weather and rising costs

      August 9, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,728)
    • Investing (2,191)
    • Politics (16,345)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved