Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Governor Newsom Claims Florida Has More Per Capita Overdose Deaths Than California. He’s Right.

by December 1, 2023
December 1, 2023
Governor Newsom Claims Florida Has More Per Capita Overdose Deaths Than California. He’s Right.

Jeffrey A. Singer

Governor Ron DeSantis, left, and Governor Gavin Newsom. (Screenshot: FNC, YouTube)

In last night’s “Red State vs. Blue State” debate between California Governor Gavin Newsom and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis on the Fox News Channel, Governor Newsom claimed that Florida’s drug overdose death rate is 41 percent higher than California’s overdose death rate.

While Governor DeSantis dismissed that and many other of Newsom’s claims as “lies,” Newsom got this one right.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2021 (the most recent year the data are available), California ranked sixteenth among the states with 26.6 overdose deaths per 100,000 persons, while Florida ranked thirty‐​third with 37.5 deaths per 100,000—41 percent higher.

However, one should not take these numbers at face value. There are multiple factors that might account for these differences. Among them are differences in demographics and availability of harm reduction programs.

For example, access to methadone treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) can reduce overdose deaths. Methadone treatment eliminates the need to seek drugs on the black market where people cannot be certain of the drugs’ dosage and purity—or even if it is the drug they think it is.

In a recent Cato Institute study on expanding access to methadone treatment, we found that California had a greater number of Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) per people with opioid use disorder than Florida. In 2021, California had one OTP for every 3,083 people with OUD, while Florida had one OTP for every 3,216 people with OUD. The states ranked twenty‐​fifth and twenty‐​sixth respectively, in OTPs per people with OUD. As we argue in the study, Congress can greatly expand access to methadone treatment by enabling primary care providers to prescribe it to treat patients with opioid use disorder.

A Cato study found that both states had legalized syringe services programs (SSPs) by 2021, in which people who use drugs can get clean syringes and, nowadays, are handed the overdose antidote naloxone. However, thirty‐​nine sanctioned SSPs were operating in California by 2022, compared to eight in Florida. In 2021, California’s population was 39.4 million, and Florida’s was roughly 44 percent lower at 21.8 million. The population difference does not explain the SSP disparity.

What might help explain the disparity is that, unlike California, Florida requires SSPs to collect one syringe for every syringe it gives out. Harm reduction organizations trying to help people who use drugs have a hard time meeting that requirement. Oftentimes, people who use drugs don’t have their used syringes with them to exchange for clean ones.

State drug paraphernalia laws make it difficult for harm reduction organizations to distribute fentanyl test strips to people who use drugs, allowing them to check the drugs for fentanyl contamination. A Cato study found that, in 2021, both California and Florida explicitly prohibited fentanyl test strips in their paraphernalia laws. Fortunately, California lawmakers legalized distributing fentanyl test strips in 2022, and Florida lawmakers did so last summer.

Most states have enacted “Good Samaritan Laws” to encourage people to call first responders if a person with whom they are using drugs is overdosing. These laws assure people that police will not arrest them for illicit drug use if they call 911. However, in many states, police may arrest the caller for non‐​drug‐​related offenses. And in Florida, police have charged and arrested people for aggravated manslaughter when the overdose victim died. Such exceptions to these Good Samaritan Laws undermine their intent.

California may provide more access to harm reduction programs than Florida. But earlier this year, Governor Newsom missed a great opportunity to let the country’s most populous state strike a major blow in that direction in 2022 when he vetoed a bill that would have permitted overdose prevention center (OPC) pilot programs in some urban areas with a high density of drug users.

As I reported in a Cato study last February, OPCs have been saving lives since 1986. There are currently 147 government‐​sanction OPCs operating in 16 countries, including 14 in Switzerland, 27 in Germany, 38 in Canada, and 2 in New York City. A federal law called the “crack house statute” (21 U.S.C. Section 856) makes OPCs illegal in the US.

While the New York City mayor and the City’s Department of Health approved the two OPCs operating there, they were defying the federal law. In 2022, Rhode Island’s governor signed a bill into law that sanctions privately funded OPCs in the Ocean State, and Minnesota’s governor signed a bill legalizing OPCs earlier this year.

As more states defy federal law by allowing OPCs to reduce overdose deaths, it might push Congress to repeal or amend the 1980s statute. Had Governor Newsom signed the OPC bill lawmakers sent to his desk, it would have given great impetus to the movement to repeal the federal law while saving many California lives.

While Governor DeSantis can boast that Florida does better than California on a number of metrics, he cannot make that claim when it comes to overdose deaths. One way Governor DeSantis can improve Florida’s overdose rate vis‐​a‐​vis California’s is by working to legalize OPCs in the Sunshine State.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
When Hayek Came to Cato
next post
Friday Feature: The Drexel Fund

You may also like

The New Deal and Recovery, Part 21: Postwar...

December 19, 2022

Energy Subsidies Win Spending Madness 2024

April 11, 2024

Should the US Respond to “Unfair” Trade Practices?

January 31, 2025

The Return of Blasphemy and Sacrilege Laws in...

January 23, 2024

An Ama(i)zing Quote from the US on Mexico’s...

November 27, 2023

We Must Unleash Free Enterprise to Meet the...

December 18, 2024

Statement on the Supreme Court’s Decision in Murthy...

June 26, 2024

Debt, Spending, and Inflation Projected to Increase in...

May 15, 2023

More Steel Tariffs: Performance Art Masquerading as Trade...

April 17, 2024

Friday Feature: SEA Homeschoolers

December 6, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Getting It Half-Baked: The Real Cause of Cannabis Market Failures

      June 6, 2025
    • I Shot the Tariff (But I Swear It Was in Self-Defense)

      June 6, 2025
    • Mike Johnson says he hopes Trump, Musk ‘reconcile’ amid ongoing feud

      June 6, 2025
    • Trump signs new executive orders intended to make flying cars a reality, slash flight times

      June 6, 2025
    • WATCH: Republicans rally behind Trump, continue to support Musk amid ‘big, beautiful’ brawl

      June 6, 2025
    • Deportations to Add Almost $1 Trillion in Costs to the “Big Beautiful Bill”

      June 6, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,149)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,552)
    • Stocks (3,132)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved