Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

FISA Reform: Dueling Proposals,Ticking Clock

by December 5, 2023
December 5, 2023
FISA Reform: Dueling Proposals,Ticking Clock

Patrick G. Eddington

Deadlines tend to focus the mind…except for the House and Senate, which every few years wait until literally the last possible moment to deal with a law that this time around expires at 12:01 a.m. on January 1, 2024.

In this case, the law in question is Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Section 702 involves the interception of communications of “foreign intelligence” interest carried on the global telecommunications network and its related infrastructure.

Last month, a bipartisan group of House and Senate members introduced the Government Surveillance Reform Act. The GSRA would, among other things, extend the Section 702 program for four years but require a probable cause‐​based warrant to access the communications of Americans acquired under the program.

Yesterday, a separate bipartisan group of House members introduced the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act (PLEWSA), whose lead author is the extremely controversial Rep. Andy Biggs (R‑AZ). Biggs has emerged as one of the most consistent and harsh critics of the Section 702 program, and his bill, like the GSRA, would impose a probable cause‐​based warrant requirement for the communications of Americans. Both bills would also apply the same requirement to government efforts to acquire data on Americans from third parties such as data brokers.

The bipartisan momentum behind these dueling legislative proposals is driven by the execrable record of surveillance abuse racked up by the Section 702 program and its masters—the FBI and NSA—over the last 15 years. Not surprisingly, national security state bureaucrats are fighting back.

The same day Biggs and his colleagues introduced their Section 702 reform bill, Punchbowl News reported that officials at the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) sent a letter to key Senate leaders on the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees claiming, among other things, that a lapse in Section 702 authority would “inject tremendous uncertainty and risk, endangering the IC’s ability to gain valuable intelligence.”

As I pointed out recently in the Orange County Register, that statement is false. During the Clinton administration, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) ran a program under Executive Order 12333 that appears to have been nearly identical to the “upstream” (or internet backbone) portion of current FISA Section 702 collection.

The reality is that the FBI and NSA simply hate having to abide by the Fourth Amendment’s individualized, particularized probable cause‐​based warrant requirement.

What they’ve never been able to credibly explain is why that standard—which governs criminal proceedings in conventional Article III courts every day in this country—is impossible to meet in the national security context. The truth is that it is indeed not only possible but absolutely necessary if the Fourth Amendment is to truly have any consistent meaning and effect.

At present, the House and Senate are scheduled to leave DC by December 15—sixteen days before Section 702 is set to expire. Which reform proposal will become law, if any, is at this point anybody’s guess.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Ending Title 42 Halved Successful Covert Illegal Immigration
next post
Secrets of Success: Dr Ebraham Afshar, MD of Ahmad Tea

You may also like

Postal Banking Continues to Fail

June 16, 2025

Why Lower Civics and U.S. History Scores? Maybe...

May 3, 2023

To Close the Budget Deficit, Uncle Sam Should...

February 26, 2025

How Large Is the Federal Debt?

October 10, 2023

Another Athlete Chooses a Low‐​Tax State

July 10, 2023

Trump’s Immunity Claims Aren’t Likely To Let Him...

January 4, 2024

International Students Benefit the United States

April 11, 2025

Rep. Miller‐​Meeks’ OTC Act Might Nudge the FDA...

July 14, 2023

Borrowing Rates Much Less Correlated with Fed’s Policy...

October 24, 2024

As Policymakers Begin to Crack Down on Xylazine...

May 8, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Debanking Order Calls for Investigation, Something Tennessee Should Have Done

      August 10, 2025
    • DVLA to roll out digital driving licences by end of year in major services overhaul

      August 10, 2025
    • Self-employed Britons face fines of up to £900 under new HMRC quarterly tax rules

      August 10, 2025
    • Rachel Reeves tipped to target pensions, property and investments in bid to plug £50bn fiscal gap

      August 10, 2025
    • Ex-army pilot Peter Dilnot tops FTSE 100 ‘fat cat’ pay list with £45m package

      August 10, 2025
    • Rachel Reeves ‘underestimated’ parents’ prepayment push to avoid private school VAT

      August 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,735)
    • Investing (2,191)
    • Politics (16,349)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved