Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Dear EPA: Go Back to the Drawing Board

by December 21, 2023
December 21, 2023
Dear EPA: Go Back to the Drawing Board

Travis Fisher

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) greenhouse gas (GHG) rule for power plants was published in May 2023 and the original comment period closed in August. However, the EPA published a supplement to its original proposal, and that comment period just closed.

The full text of my comment in the EPA docket is available here.

The supplemental notice solicited comments on (1) reliability issues associated with the rulemaking and (2) EPA’s Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), which the EPA originally failed to publish but is required under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

For short, let’s call this year’s proposal the Clean Power Plan 2.0 (CPP 2.0) because it’s the second effort by the EPA to promulgate a Clean Power Plan using section 111 of the Clean Air Act. The first effort started in 2014 and was ultimately overturned by the Supreme Court in the case West Virginia v. EPA.

Like the first CPP, the EPA’s selection of the best system of emission reduction (BSER) in CPP 2.0 is also arbitrary, capricious, and unsupported by the available data. The original plan was all about shifting generation, mostly from coal to renewables. The Supreme Court said that’s not authorized under the statute.

This time, EPA’s BSER includes burning low‐​GHG hydrogen at natural gas‐​fired power plants and using carbon capture and storage/​sequestration (CCS). Neither technology is “adequately demonstrated,” as required by the Clean Air Act, and it is unclear whether the EPA will change course in its forthcoming final rule.

Developments since the original proposal was published—like the cancellations of offshore wind projects and carbon dioxide pipelines—have further eroded the justification for the EPA’s proposed BSER. They also raise concerns regarding whether the EPA has adequately assessed the CPP 2.0’s impacts on the cost and reliability of electricity.

In my comments, I urge the EPA to reconsider its proposal. The shortcomings of CPP 2.0 are so numerous and complicated that the best path forward is for the EPA to go back to the drawing board. At the bare minimum, the EPA should improve its rulemaking by issuing a new supplemental notice focused on developing an objective, accurate assessment of the rule’s impact on the cost of electricity.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Post Office victims’ compensation pot cut by half
next post
Profit From the AI Wave Now: One Stock With Lots of Upside Potential

You may also like

Senate Turns to Credit Cards in Biden’s “War...

May 14, 2024

Shedding Light on the Incidence of Illegal Noncitizen...

May 23, 2024

Critics Exaggerate Risks and Minimize Benefits of Gestational...

December 6, 2023

On Japan, Washington’s Economic Policies Belie Rhetoric

April 12, 2024

Friday Feature: The EdChoice Friedman Index

April 4, 2025

Overdose Prevention Centers Are Saving Lives—So Why Is...

February 19, 2025

SCOTUS Upholds a Tax on Stock Ownership in...

June 20, 2024

New Research Highlights How Chinese SOE Reform Helped...

September 22, 2023

Could Policymakers Improve Youth Online Safety Without Running...

December 5, 2024

Presidents Can’t Overhaul Election Law by Decree

March 26, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • M&S reopens online orders after cyberattack disruption

      June 10, 2025
    • UK payrolls see biggest drop since covid as wage growth slows and job market weakens

      June 10, 2025
    • Why AI and green tech are vital to SME growth in 2025

      June 10, 2025
    • Yes, it’s great to get PR coverage – until it’s locked behind a bloody paywall

      June 10, 2025
    • We have to act now to keep AI from becoming a far-left Trojan Horse

      June 10, 2025
    • SME lending delays slashed by 80% thanks to fintech-driven back-office reform

      June 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,174)
    • Investing (2,021)
    • Politics (15,580)
    • Stocks (3,138)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved