Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Pentagon slammed for calling Lloyd Austin’s surgery to remove cancer ‘elective’: ‘Arguing semantics’

by January 10, 2024
January 10, 2024
Pentagon slammed for calling Lloyd Austin’s surgery to remove cancer ‘elective’: ‘Arguing semantics’
Read this article for free!
Plus get unlimited access to thousands of articles, videos and more with your free account!
Please enter a valid email address.
By entering your email, you are agreeing to Fox News Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

Doctors are calling out the Pentagon for calling Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s recent medical procedure to treat prostate cancer an ‘elective’ surgery,’ saying that characterization is misleading.

The 70-year-old Defense secretary was hospitalized on Jan. 1 for complications from what officials are still calling an ‘elective’ medical procedure that was later revealed to be related to prostate cancer. The Pentagon chief’s cancer diagnosis was made public Tuesday. The administration had previously only disclosed on Friday that Austin had been hospitalized earlier that week. 

The Biden administration has taken heat for its handling of Austin’s absence, particularly on the issue of transparency, and, now, its facing backlash for telling the public last week when details of Austin’s condition were scarce that he had undergone an ‘elective’ surgery. 

Speaking Tuesday with Fox News Digital, Fox News contributor Dr. Marc Siegel, said Austin’s prostatectomy is ‘technically an elective surgery,’ but that characterization is misleading. 

‘Elective is divided into emergency and non-emergency. We take elective mostly to mean a nose job and so the word elective is misleading. This is prostate cancer,’ Siegel said. ‘Not all prostate cancer is operated on, but they decided to take it out because they thought it was aggressive-probably from the biopsy,’ he said.

Siegel said it is misleading to call Austin’s prostate cancer surgery a minimally invasive surgery.

‘Even though the da Vinci robot is technically considered minimally invasive surgery, it implies that it’s a small operation. It would be better to define Austin’s surgery as robotic prostate surgery.’ 

‘But going under anesthesia and general surgery is not a walk in the park that needs to be taken very seriously, even if our technology has improved greatly,’ Siegel said.

Dr. Nicole Saphier, a Fox News contributor and radiologist, told Fox News Digital that she would not consider a cancer surgery to be elective.

‘Anyone would think that cancer treatment is not elective, but as we learned during COVID, the definition of elective is very different from a physician or even a patient’s perspective, Dr. Saphier said. ‘Cancer surgeries were delayed during the early stages of COVID when all elective cases were put on hold.’ 

 I would not consider a cancer surgery to be elective.

— Dr. Nicole Saphier, Fox News contributor and Radiologist

‘Ultimately, cancer is life-threatening, so it is really arguing semantics whether you want to call cancer treatment, elective or not,’ she said. 

‘My personal opinion as a cancer specialist and human, I would not consider a cancer surgery to be elective, but the reality is, his prostate cancer was not immediately life-threatening at the moment,’ Dr. Saphier said. ‘Therefore, he was able to be scheduled on an outpatient, non-emergency basis.’

Pentagon press secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder defended the use of ‘elective surgery’ in a Tuesday press briefing, deferring to medical professionals.

‘I’m going to defer to medical officials on this,’ Ryder said. ‘Again, we released this information as soon as we had it. And so, again, I’m going to refer back to the statement and, you know, going forward, we will use that as the baseline in terms of describing it.’

Ryder said that Austin’s doctor previously defined his surgery as elective and the initial statement from the Pentagon was written after consulting his doctors at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.

‘So to my knowledge, that initial statement was coordinated in consultation with his doctors,’ Ryder said. 

Following Austin’s surgery, he was hospitalized following ‘complications,’ Ryder said on Friday, Jan. 5.

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers on Tuesday announced a formal inquiry into the lack of transparency surrounding Austin’s hospitalization.

‘With wars in Ukraine and Israel, the idea that the White House and even your own Deputy did not understand the nature of your condition is patently unacceptable,’ Rogers wrote in a letter to Austin on Tuesday.

Seigel said that Austin should use this experience as a ‘great teaching moment’ and bring public awareness to prostate cancer. 

‘This should have been a great teaching moment and still could be for Black Americans, given the fact that they have 2.5 times greater risk of prostate cancer and 2.5 greater chances of dying,’ Siegel said.

‘I would have liked to see the defense secretary come out for public awareness rather than hide– and he still could,’ he said.

Austin was admitted to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on Dec. 22 and underwent surgery to treat the cancer. He developed the infection a week later. 

Biden and other senior administration officials were not told for days about his hospitalization or his cancer.

According to the doctors, the cancer was detected when Austin had a regular screening in early December. 

They said his prostate cancer was detected early, and his prognosis was excellent.

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Greggs announce 160 new branch openings
next post
Dems announce 8-figure campaign targeting communities of color with hopes of winning back House

You may also like

Former Obama official gives one-word answer when asked...

June 8, 2024

Conservatives praise McCarthy for grilling reporter until she...

September 15, 2023

Trump says he’s ‘proud to be the most...

June 25, 2023

THE IRONY: Recent Temple University Graduate Gunned Down...

September 29, 2022

History of voting locations, the reasons we vote...

November 7, 2023

Riley Gaines says liberals are supporting her activism...

May 18, 2023

EXCLUSIVE: Department of Veteran Affairs LGBTQ Care Coordinator Sends...

October 21, 2022

Klaus Schwab says Communist China is a “Role...

November 23, 2022

Poll: Majority of Republicans back Trump’s strikes on...

June 25, 2025

Dem’s ‘flagrantly unconstitutional’ anti-White supremacy bill would ‘gut...

January 17, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Democrats project doom and gloom, not celebration, with July 4 messages

      July 5, 2025
    • Xi Jinping’s surprise no-show at BRICS Summit fuels speculation about China’s global standing

      July 5, 2025
    • Tesla sees UK sales rebound in June as EV market accelerates

      July 5, 2025
    • Hived raises $42m to roll out electric delivery fleet across southern England

      July 5, 2025
    • Week Ahead: NIFTY Set To Stay In A Defined Range Unless These Levels Are Taken Out; Drags Support Higher

      July 5, 2025
    • “A turning point for education”: James Caan launches bold education reform plan in House of Lords

      July 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,397)
    • Investing (2,102)
    • Politics (15,947)
    • Stocks (3,190)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved