Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Mayors Burnham and Street Unite on Cost-Effective Alternatives to Scrapped HS2 Northern Section

by February 8, 2024
February 8, 2024
Mayors Burnham and Street Unite on Cost-Effective Alternatives to Scrapped HS2 Northern Section

In a notable collaboration, Andy Burnham, the Labour mayor of Greater Manchester, and Andy Street, the Tory mayor of the West Midlands, have come together to present alternative plans for the abandoned section of HS2, emphasising that inaction is not viable.

Taking the stage together, Burnham and Street outlined three potential options following the government’s decision to halt the long-awaited northern segment of the high-speed rail project. They asserted that their proposed alternatives, largely backed by private funding, would incur significantly lower costs compared to HS2, albeit without precise figures available at this initial stage.

To spearhead their initiative, the mayors established a consortium chaired by Sir David Higgins, a former HS2 chair, involving private engineering and finance firms such as Arup, EY, Skanska, and Mace.

The move comes in response to the cancellation of the northern leg of HS2 announced in October, with Rishi Sunak pledging £36 billion towards alternative transport initiatives under the banner of Network North.

Street lamented the cancellation of the northern HS2 line as a setback, highlighting the congestion on the west coast mainline and M6 motorway, underscoring the imperative to explore alternative solutions.

Burnham echoed this sentiment, stressing the necessity of addressing rail capacity between the West Midlands and Greater Manchester to sustain economic growth. He warned that neglecting this issue would result in significant transport challenges for generations to come.

One of the proposed options unveiled involves constructing a segregated line akin to the original HS2 plan but with reduced maximum speeds, thereby cutting costs. Street clarified that this alternative route would closely resemble the scrapped HS2 section, albeit with slower trains, as the high costs of HS2 were partly attributed to its uncompromising speed requirements, with trains set to operate at up to 225mph.

Burnham noted that the northern leg of HS2 was comparatively straightforward in terms of infrastructure requirements, as no extensive tunneling was necessary. The envisaged new line would primarily cater to passenger services, allowing existing freight traffic to utilize the west coast mainline.

Regarding potential stops along the route, Street indicated a willingness to consider intermediate stations between Crewe and Manchester, albeit in limited numbers.

Aside from the new line proposal, the mayors presented two additional options: enhancing segments of the existing west coast mainline or implementing bypasses on its busiest sections. However, Street suggested these alternatives would offer marginal benefits with minimal capital investment.

Emphasizing that their proposals were not an attempt to revive HS2, Burnham clarified that they had accepted the government’s decision. However, they expressed optimism following constructive discussions with Transport Secretary Mark Harper, who demonstrated receptiveness to their proposals. Notably, ministers have granted approval for involvement from HS2 and Network Rail in further exploring these alternatives.

Read more:
Mayors Burnham and Street Unite on Cost-Effective Alternatives to Scrapped HS2 Northern Section

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
ICO urges all app developers to prioritise privacy
next post
Garland says special counsel probing Biden classified records has submitted report, under White House review

You may also like

Farmers descend on Westminster amid inheritance tax row...

December 11, 2024

ViGeek AI Review: Generate Free AI Videos Easily

November 14, 2024

Warning post-Brexit border checks could deter EU imports

April 6, 2023

Aston Martin poaches CEO from rival Bentley

March 22, 2024

UK steelmakers avoid immediate 50% US tariff, but...

June 4, 2025

Bookings Open for The Royal Ballet School’s 2025...

January 22, 2025

Banks to roll out coin ATMs in communities...

February 10, 2025

Jeremy Hunt’s budget is set to let a...

March 9, 2023

Boris Usherovich: A Chronicle of Resilience and Achievement

March 17, 2024

Government invests £55m for Facial Recognition Tools in...

April 10, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Universities in Libertarian Land

      June 6, 2025
    • Elon Musk may speak to Trump aides in push to calm feud

      June 6, 2025
    • Everyone Talks About Leaving a Better Planet for Our Children: Why Don’t We Leave Better Children for Our Planet?

      June 6, 2025
    • MARK HALPERIN: Democrats try to construct a Frankenstein candidate while JD Vance gains momentum for 2028

      June 6, 2025
    • ‘Gone too far’: GOP lawmakers rally around Trump after Musk raises Epstein allegations

      June 6, 2025
    • Democrats begin to embrace Musk amid Trump spat after party railed against him as a ‘dictator’

      June 6, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,149)
    • Investing (2,012)
    • Politics (15,544)
    • Stocks (3,130)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved