Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Conservative groups are pushing Speaker Johnson to reform controversial spy program FISA

by March 1, 2024
March 1, 2024
Conservative groups are pushing Speaker Johnson to reform controversial spy program FISA

A group of conservative policy organizations are urging House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to not reauthorize the controversial surveillance program Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and are pushing the Republican leader to oppose including reforms in any upcoming must-pass legislative vehicles such as a continuing resolution or omnibus package.

In a letter to Johnson sent Thursday, Americans for Prosperity (AFP), FreedomWorks, Taxpayers Protection Alliance and Conservative Partnership Institute said ‘it is critical that Congress does not attempt to force a reauthorization of this authority into a must-pass legislative vehicle, and once and for all finally have a standalone vote on this topic.’

‘A standalone vote on Section 702 ensures focused scrutiny and accountability, safeguarding Americans’ privacy and maintaining the country’s national security. Shoving it into a must-pass continuing resolution avoids a transparent and open process on how to reform a deeply flawed program,’ AFP’s senior policy analyst James Czerniawski told Fox News Digital. 

Earlier this month, the House Rules Committee was set to vote on the measure to renew Section 702 of FISA, which would have advanced it to the House floor for a possible vote later in the week, but Johnson pushed that vote. 

In the letter, the groups slammed the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) for allegedly negotiating in ‘bad faith’ after it and the House Judiciary Committee ‘agreed to a floor process the week of Feb. 12th to consider a base reauthorization bill, but with the opportunity for both committees to offer amendments, the contours of which were understood by both parties.’

The letter also claims that on the eve of the Rules Committee hearing, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner, R-Ohio, ‘inexplicably released a cryptic Dear Colleague claiming a serious and urgent threat to national security requiring review by Members of the House in a classified setting.’

That warning, reportedly, was the intelligence related to Russian nuclear capabilities in space which could threaten satellites, including potentially knocking out U.S. military communications and reconnaissance.

On Feb. 13, HPSCI voted 23-1 to make information about a destabilizing foreign military capability available to Members of Congress. 

Turner and Ranking Member Jim Himes, D-Conn., issued a bipartisan notification — what’s known as ‘a Dear Colleague letter’ — urging their colleagues to review this classified information in the secured room on Feb. 13. The language of the Dear Colleague letter was cleared by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

On Feb. 14, reports of the Dear Colleague letter surfaced, which prompted Turner to issue a statement around 11:30 a.m. about a ‘serious national security threat.’ 

In an interview with ‘Meet the Press,’ Turner emphasized that he believed that the Biden administration was sleepwalking its way into an international crisis. 

The letter criticized Turner’s disclosure, adding that ‘both the White House and Senate Intelligence Committee have made statements suggesting serious concerns regarding the risk of disclosure of sources and methods because of Chairman Turner’s Dear Colleague and subsequent press release.’

The groups asserted that ‘the reauthorization of Section 702 has been top of mind for Members of Congress for over a year now and HPSCI’s sole focus and engagement on this issue during this time is evident. It is highly suspect that as the House was on the verge of considering a vehicle for reauthorization, rather than helping to facilitate a carefully negotiated floor process for considering a powerful surveillance tool, HPSCI instead spent its efforts on a non-urgent matter and in the process may ultimately have jeopardized national security.’

But a spokesperson for HPSCI told Fox News Digital that Turner ‘does not play politics with national security.’ 

Section 702 of FISA has been both credited with preventing terror attacks on U.S. soil and accused of being a vehicle for spying on U.S. citizens.

It lets the government keep tabs on specific foreign nationals outside the country without first obtaining a warrant to do so, even if the party on the other side of those communications is an American on U.S. soil. 

Turner has also advocated for FISA reforms and put forth his own reforms.  

But the groups told Johnson in its letter Thursday that while the genesis of HPSCI was originally intended to rein in and provide oversight of an unaccountable Intelligence Community found to be violating Americans’ rights, they claim it has ‘unfortunately morphed into merely a rubber stamp’ of Intelligence Community activities, ‘unwilling to even have a debate on how to hold the Intelligence Community accountable for their rampant and repeated abuses of the Section 702 authority.’

It is critical that Congress does not attempt to force a reauthorization of this authority into a must-pass legislative vehicle, and once and for all finally have a standalone vote on this topic. We stand ready to work with Congress to advance a solution that accomplishes the security and Americans’ civil liberties,’ they said. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Top House Republican prepares ‘fail safe’ option in case GOP can’t reach agreement on Ukraine aid
next post
Are the Seven Still Magnificent?

You may also like

Karine Jean-Pierre says Biden is ready to handle...

March 7, 2024

Why is Mike Pence Still Trashing Trump and...

November 14, 2022

Was President Trump Set Up by His Own...

October 20, 2022

French minister warns country ‘durably under threat from...

December 5, 2023

US Supreme Court Overturns Pennsylvania Court – Rules...

October 12, 2022

Indiana Republicans look to double down on mail-in...

February 23, 2023

McConnell urges more aid for Ukraine despite skepticism...

October 31, 2023

Speaker Johnson moves on Senate’s Trump budget bill...

April 5, 2025

Vivek Ramaswamy says there are only two ‘America...

January 7, 2024

John Bolton claims just two questions matter in...

July 10, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Why More Businesses Are Choosing a Fractional CMO Instead of Agencies and Junior Hires

      July 19, 2025
    • ‘Get a job’: Medicaid work requirements included in Trump’s megabill sparks partisan debate on Capitol Hill

      July 19, 2025
    • Trump has now been in office for six months, for the second time. Here are the highlights

      July 19, 2025
    • Week Ahead: NIFTY Violates Short-Term Supports; Stays Tentative Devoid Of Any Major Triggers

      July 19, 2025
    • Slovenia approves law to legalize assisted dying for terminally-ill adults

      July 19, 2025
    • Heritage Foundation founder Edwin J. Feulner dies at 83

      July 19, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,525)
    • Investing (2,134)
    • Politics (16,122)
    • Stocks (3,221)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved