Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Judge Dismisses Claim of Australian Computer Scientist as Bitcoin Inventor

by March 15, 2024
March 15, 2024
Judge Dismisses Claim of Australian Computer Scientist as Bitcoin Inventor

In a landmark ruling, the judge presiding over the legal dispute regarding the inventorship of Bitcoin has declared that Australian computer scientist Craig Wright is not the creator of the cryptocurrency.

The verdict, delivered by Mr Justice Mellor after a five-week trial at the High Court, came promptly following the conclusion of proceedings. Despite expectations of deliberation, the judge cited overwhelming evidence leading to a swift decision.

Bitcoin, the world’s most renowned cryptocurrency, has been thrust into the limelight recently with its unprecedented surge to a new record valuation. Yet, the identity of its creator, known only by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, has remained a mystery. Since 2016, Dr. Wright has asserted himself as Satoshi Nakamoto, but his claims have faced scrutiny from cryptocurrency experts, and his supporting evidence has been subject to skepticism.

Dr. Wright has been embroiled in legal battles for years, defending his narrative against individuals who contested his assertions. This particular case, heard at the Intellectual Property Court of London’s High Court, was initiated by a consortium of Bitcoin companies, including members of the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), which includes Jack Dorsey’s payments firm, Block. COPA accused Dr. Wright of hindering cryptocurrency development through aggressive litigation tactics.

During the trial, COPA’s legal team accused Dr. Wright of engaging in a “massive campaign of dishonesty and forgery,” alleging that he had even forged documents while the proceedings were ongoing. Jonathan Hough, COPA’s lawyer, emphasized the seriousness of Dr. Wright’s actions, characterizing some aspects as farcical yet stressing their significant ramifications.

Dr. Wright’s defense contended that if he were not the true inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto would have surfaced to refute his claims. However, Mr. Justice Mellor concurred with the plaintiffs, affirming that Dr. Wright was not the individual behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto and did not create the Bitcoin system. A comprehensive written judgement is expected to follow the judge’s ruling.

The outcome of this trial marks a significant milestone in the ongoing quest to unravel the mysteries surrounding Bitcoin’s origins and reinforces the enduring enigma surrounding its creator.

Read more:
Judge Dismisses Claim of Australian Computer Scientist as Bitcoin Inventor

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Centrist group No Labels sets up panel to select third-party presidential ticket
next post
Missed Out on Micron’s 112% Surge? Here’s Your Second Chance!

You may also like

A Critical Business Challenge for 2024

February 8, 2024

Ways to Make Your Home Pretty, Presentable and...

June 10, 2024

E-scooters banned from more rail lines

December 27, 2022

UK food price inflation hits highest level since...

August 31, 2022

Top 5 Industries That Get Advantages From IoT...

August 29, 2024

Stumped by smallprint: credit card agreements are gobbledegook...

April 5, 2023

Amazon invests in the UK’s largest e-HGV fleet,...

January 14, 2025

How To Deal With Distractions While Playing At...

June 25, 2024

Effective KPIs for Team-Building and Events Businesses

February 27, 2025

Cristiano Ronaldo faces $1bn lawsuit for promoting Binance

November 30, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Blue state Republicans threaten rebellion if Senate changes key provision in Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Ricketts, Fetterman team up for crackdown on China’s attempts to purchase US farmland

      June 5, 2025
    • Hamas working to ‘sabotage’ Trump-backed aid group with ‘fake news’: Israeli official

      June 5, 2025
    • Longtime Trump loyalist flips on GOP’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Supreme Court rules Wisconsin unconstitutionally discriminated against Christian charity

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump touts ‘very positive’ breakthrough with Xi after slamming China for trade violation

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,529)
    • Stocks (3,128)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved