Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Judge Dismisses Claim of Australian Computer Scientist as Bitcoin Inventor

by March 15, 2024
March 15, 2024
Judge Dismisses Claim of Australian Computer Scientist as Bitcoin Inventor

In a landmark ruling, the judge presiding over the legal dispute regarding the inventorship of Bitcoin has declared that Australian computer scientist Craig Wright is not the creator of the cryptocurrency.

The verdict, delivered by Mr Justice Mellor after a five-week trial at the High Court, came promptly following the conclusion of proceedings. Despite expectations of deliberation, the judge cited overwhelming evidence leading to a swift decision.

Bitcoin, the world’s most renowned cryptocurrency, has been thrust into the limelight recently with its unprecedented surge to a new record valuation. Yet, the identity of its creator, known only by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, has remained a mystery. Since 2016, Dr. Wright has asserted himself as Satoshi Nakamoto, but his claims have faced scrutiny from cryptocurrency experts, and his supporting evidence has been subject to skepticism.

Dr. Wright has been embroiled in legal battles for years, defending his narrative against individuals who contested his assertions. This particular case, heard at the Intellectual Property Court of London’s High Court, was initiated by a consortium of Bitcoin companies, including members of the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), which includes Jack Dorsey’s payments firm, Block. COPA accused Dr. Wright of hindering cryptocurrency development through aggressive litigation tactics.

During the trial, COPA’s legal team accused Dr. Wright of engaging in a “massive campaign of dishonesty and forgery,” alleging that he had even forged documents while the proceedings were ongoing. Jonathan Hough, COPA’s lawyer, emphasized the seriousness of Dr. Wright’s actions, characterizing some aspects as farcical yet stressing their significant ramifications.

Dr. Wright’s defense contended that if he were not the true inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto would have surfaced to refute his claims. However, Mr. Justice Mellor concurred with the plaintiffs, affirming that Dr. Wright was not the individual behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto and did not create the Bitcoin system. A comprehensive written judgement is expected to follow the judge’s ruling.

The outcome of this trial marks a significant milestone in the ongoing quest to unravel the mysteries surrounding Bitcoin’s origins and reinforces the enduring enigma surrounding its creator.

Read more:
Judge Dismisses Claim of Australian Computer Scientist as Bitcoin Inventor

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Centrist group No Labels sets up panel to select third-party presidential ticket
next post
Missed Out on Micron’s 112% Surge? Here’s Your Second Chance!

You may also like

Only a third of hospitality firms optimistic about...

May 30, 2023

Transforming Education: How Roedean School Headmaster Oliver Blond...

February 8, 2023

Radical land tax proposal gains traction with support...

August 27, 2024

NatWest to close another 23 branches in England...

January 27, 2023

Frasers CEO calls for urgent reform of ‘outdated’...

September 18, 2023

8 Habits to Quickly Learn to Improve Your...

January 27, 2023

Secrets of Success: Aaron Solomon, CEO and Co-Founder...

August 30, 2022

How Decentralized Platforms Are Changing the Future of...

September 26, 2024

Will UK creatives be replaced by robots?

January 30, 2023

Chancellor criticised for lack of support for electric...

March 6, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Rescissions: A Small but Welcome Step Toward Spending Discipline

      June 5, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Why Navy ships should not be named for gay rights icons

      June 5, 2025
    • GREGG JARRETT: Biden, the ‘marionette president; and the case of the runaway autopen

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump Practically Bans Travel and Immigration from 12 Countries with Flimsy Security Justifications

      June 5, 2025
    • ‘He’s not a big factor’: Trump’s Senate allies dismiss Elon Musk’s calls to ‘kill the bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Fears grow that Tata Steel could be excluded from Starmer-Trump trade deal

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,523)
    • Stocks (3,127)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved