Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Spending Madness Quarterfinals

by April 2, 2024
April 2, 2024
Spending Madness Quarterfinals

Chris Edwards

There are eight federal programs remaining in Spending Madness 2024. These are high‐​priority spending cuts for Congress to consider, according to our crowdsourced tournament results so far.

Please vote today in the quarterfinals, and then we’ll move to the next round on April 4.

The failures of the eight remaining programs are summarized when you click the pictures here. One common failing of government programs is stagnancy. While market economies are always adapting and improving, the bureaucratic government falls behind. Outdated programs linger for decades consuming taxpayer resources and undermining the economy.

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting was launched in the 1960s but adds little value in today’s expansive media environment where vast educational content is available on YouTube. Even more outdated are farm subsidies, which were launched in the 1930s when many farmers were poor. Today, farmers are much wealthier than other people, and farm subsidies mainly go to large corporate‐​style operations.

And there is public housing. What do you notice in these photos (below) of a project in Alexandria, Virginia? When you walk around it, you see that all 13 buildings are the same, and they are unchanged in the seven decades since the government opened them in 1947. It apparently never occurred to the government managers to plant any trees, bushes, or flowers.

Because people in public housing are not owners, no one has put in bay windows, added an addition, painted their homes, built a deck, or made any other normal improvement. I wonder where tenants are even allowed to plant anything.

Government programs and policies tend to be stagnant and uniform. Many programs have outlived any usefulness their original supporters envisioned. Congress should end subsidies for activities—such as housing, broadcasting, and farming—that markets can tackle with diverse and innovative approaches.

Background. The photos are the Samuel Madden Homes built in an area called The Hump. The construction was part of Big Government “slum clearing” efforts in the mid‐​20 century, which used eminent domain and federal dollars. As one history notes, Alexandria “began a program of ‘slum’ clearance in 1939 and two years later condemned and demolished homes in two mixed‐​race neighborhoods, The Berg and The Hump, sending Black residents into substandard, segregated public housing.” The Samuel Madden Homes are finally being redeveloped after 77 years, and hopefully some lessons have been learned.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The CFPB’s Overdraft and NSF Mess
next post
What does the budget mean for the ever-evolving world of corporate real estate?

You may also like

More Bad News for Link Taxes, Eh?

November 14, 2023

A Link Tax Won’t Save the Newspaper Industry...

August 14, 2023

Supreme Court Wrongly Upholds a Broadly Worded Speech Ban

June 23, 2023

How the Electoral College Works To Cabin Fraud...

March 12, 2024

Border Patrol Agent Deaths in the Line of...

January 8, 2024

Javier Milei and the Legitimacy of Libertarian Policy

March 27, 2025

Industrial Policy, Whether Republican or Democrat, is Anti-Liberty

January 3, 2025

The Chilling Effect: How Fear Drives Doctors Away...

February 25, 2025

Are Libertarians Pro-Union or Anti-Union?

December 9, 2024

Temporary Tax Extenders Are Still Bad Policy

November 30, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Rescissions: A Small but Welcome Step Toward Spending Discipline

      June 5, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Why Navy ships should not be named for gay rights icons

      June 5, 2025
    • GREGG JARRETT: Biden, the ‘marionette president; and the case of the runaway autopen

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump Practically Bans Travel and Immigration from 12 Countries with Flimsy Security Justifications

      June 5, 2025
    • ‘He’s not a big factor’: Trump’s Senate allies dismiss Elon Musk’s calls to ‘kill the bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Fears grow that Tata Steel could be excluded from Starmer-Trump trade deal

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,523)
    • Stocks (3,127)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved