Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

FISA: When In Doubt, Always Bet On Fear

by April 12, 2024
April 12, 2024
FISA: When In Doubt, Always Bet On Fear

Patrick G. Eddington

One point I always make when talking about national security issues, and especially those involving surveillance powers, is this: when in doubt, always bet on fear.

This afternoon, the House of Representatives wrapped up an extremely tense and at times quite acrimonious debate on reauthorization of Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and specifically the FISA Section 702 warrantless electronic mass surveillance program. The final vote on the bill was 273–147.

An amendment to require the FBI to get a warrant to access the stored communications of Americans collected under the 702 program failed in a nail‐​biter, 212–212. Opponents of the warrant requirement got key help from an unlikely source: former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D‑CA), who made an impassioned plea to reject the warrant requirement and support the underlying bill. Her position was rather ironic, given her prior support for exactly this kind of warrant requirement in 2014, 2015, and 2016. Fierce opposition from the Biden administration also helped sink the amendment.

Another amendment allowing Members of Congress to sit in during FISA court debates and requiring quarterly 702 query reports from the FBI passed easily, as did an amendment adding fentanyl trafficking to the approved uses of Section 702 collection—a flagrant and dangerous expansion of FISA authority that will no doubt make the failed “War on Drugs” even worse.

Even more ominously, an amendment to change the definition of “electronic communications provider” also passed, meaning that a vastly greater number of businesses’ communications may also be subject to Section 702 collection and storage.

One change made to the underlying bill during negotiations was reducing the reauthorization time of Title VII from five years to two years. That’s a tactical victory for reformers that may have larger implications down the road, as the clear expansion of FISA surveillance this bill represents virtually guarantees additional abuses of the constitutional rights of Americans.

Given the Biden administration’s stated support for the bill absent the warrant requirement, it seems certain that Biden’s national security team will push the Senate to simply move the House bill as passed. Whether that will happen is something we’ll get a better sense of next week.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
FISA Legislative Whiplash
next post
ICE Is Releasing Fewer Criminals Than Under Trump

You may also like

My Year’s Worth of Election Law Writing

January 3, 2025

The Hamas-Israel War

October 15, 2023

The White House Addresses Tranq While Lawmakers Fight...

July 11, 2023

NEW POLL: WI, PA, & MI Voters Believe...

September 9, 2024

As EV Sales Hit a Speed Bump, NC...

August 7, 2024

Is Tort Reform the Way to Constrain Healthcare...

October 13, 2023

New CBO Report on Growth and Tax Cuts...

December 10, 2024

When Does Speech Threaten Officials? From Washington, a...

February 21, 2025

Increased Medicaid Coverage Is Not Improving Low Birth...

June 13, 2023

After Trump v US: Presidents and Domestic Use...

July 3, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • UK prices for Mounjaro weight-loss jab to rise by up to 170% after Trump pressure on drugmakers

      August 15, 2025
    • UK workers rank among the world’s most miserable, survey finds

      August 15, 2025
    • Did Oregon’s Drug Decriminalization Increase Crime or Overdoses? —Separating Short-term Spikes from Long-term Trends

      August 15, 2025
    • Jennings v. Smith Brief: Defending Alabamians from Illegal Police Demands for ID

      August 15, 2025
    • UK bioethanol industry on brink as government rejects rescue deals

      August 15, 2025
    • UK small firms that celebrate success see faster growth, Xero study finds

      August 15, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,796)
    • Investing (2,215)
    • Politics (16,389)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved