Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

FISA Fight Final Score: Surveillance State 1, Bill of Rights 0

by April 22, 2024
April 22, 2024
FISA Fight Final Score: Surveillance State 1, Bill of Rights 0

Patrick G. Eddington

Just shy of one year ago, the public learned that an FBI agent had conducted a query of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702 database for information on 19,000 American donors to a congressional campaign, among other episodes of 702 database query misconduct. The revelations, contained in a partially declassified Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) opinion, received massive media coverage and condemnation from House and Senate members across the political spectrum. The facts about these domestic surveillance abuses were not then and are not now in dispute.

Yet despite this clear evidence for the need to require a probable cause‐​based warrant to access the stored communications of Americans under FISA Section 702 (and this Senate floor speech on April 19 by Senator Mike Lee (R‑UT) is a legal clinic in that respect), over the last ten days efforts to mandate such a requirement were defeated in both chambers. The final bill, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (H.R. 7888), was signed into law by President Joe Biden on Saturday, April 20, just hours after a Senate majority stopped every attempt to improve the bill via amendments and passed it by a vote of 60–34.

Even worse, H.R. 7888 actually expands the reach of FISA Section 702 by broadening the definition of “electronic communications service provider” in a way that will encompass cloud‐​based storage companies, among others. That provision was condemned even by former Justice Department lawyers who have argued cases before the FISC.

To the extent that there’s any good news for Bill of Rights defenders in this otherwise outrageous and maddening outcome, it is this: we will do this all over again two years from now. For the first time, the FISA Section 702 provision has been extended for only two years—significantly less than the prior reauthorizations in 2012 and 2018.

The question is, will the outcome be any different the next time around?

Unless surveillance reformers change their approach (i.e., shift from a nonprofit‐​based advocacy and public education effort to a method with more political punch), the results may be the same or even worse.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
DP TRADING ROOM: Find Shorts Using the Diamond Dog Scan
next post
A Return to US Casualty Aversion: The 9/11 Wars as Aberrations

You may also like

What Would Consumer-Regulated Electricity Look Like?

August 9, 2024

Defending Globalization, Now Available in Paperback and Ebook

November 14, 2024

Autonomy and Affordability: Solving Homelessness Without Coercion

December 13, 2024

Friday Feature: Chesapeake Bay Academy

May 16, 2025

Energy Department Not Interested In Government Transparency

August 14, 2025

The Proper Way to End the GSE Experiment

December 9, 2024

The Case for Trump’s 15 Percent Corporate Tax...

January 8, 2025

Decision on Menthol Ban Delayed Until March 2024

December 6, 2023

Licensing Boards: Still Brazen After All These Years

February 25, 2025

The State of Kids Online Safety Legislation at...

August 1, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • What Automatic Planning and Scheduling Means for Your Projects

      August 25, 2025
    • Ultimate Traders Review: Easy and Effective Prop Trading

      August 25, 2025
    • ‘Separated from reality’: Senate Republicans fume as Dems use Epstein saga to block Trump’s agenda

      August 25, 2025
    • US ally summons Trump ambassador over ‘unacceptable’ antisemitism allegations

      August 25, 2025
    • Gen Z workers turn back to office jobs to combat loneliness

      August 25, 2025
    • US jobs market faces ‘Trump slump’ as tariffs and cuts hit growth

      August 25, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,876)
    • Investing (2,235)
    • Politics (16,478)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved