Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Stefanik hits special counsel Jack Smith with ethics complaint, accuses him of election meddling

by May 1, 2024
May 1, 2024
Stefanik hits special counsel Jack Smith with ethics complaint, accuses him of election meddling

House GOP Conference Chair Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., is filing an ethics complaint against special counsel Jack Smith on Tuesday, accusing him of violating Department of Justice (DOJ) standards and trying to tip the election against former President Trump.

In a letter sent to the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, Stefanik urged the government watchdog to investigate Smith over accusations of ‘abusing the resources of the federal government to unlawfully interfere with the 2024 presidential election.’

‘Jack Smith’s multiple attempts to rush to trial the federal January 6th case against President Trump violated long-standing, explicit Justice Department policy,’ Stefanik wrote.

‘Further, Jack Smith’s repeated violations of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia’s stay of proceedings are a lawless breach of trial ethics and lawyerly conduct. Jack Smith’s actions brought disrepute to the Justice Department and the federal government as a whole, and he should face discipline appropriately.’

Smith’s case against Trump, stemming from accusations he tried to overturn the 2020 election, was supposed to go to trial in March but has been stuck in limbo as the Supreme Court weighs the ex-president’s claim he is immune to criminal prosecution for actions taken while in the White House.

The former U.S. attorney and human rights prosecutor petitioned the high court multiple times to reject Trump’s immunity claims and bid to delay his trial, including most recently on April 8.

Stefanik’s complaint accused him of first trying to influence the election in August 2023, when Smith petitioned for a Jan. 2, 2024 trial.

‘There exist approximately thirteen million pages of discovery for President Trump to review, plus thousands of hours of camera footage. Prosecutors bringing a case of this complexity — with so many consequential and novel legal issues to sort out — would normally never seek to bring it to trial within five months,’ she argued. 

‘The only reason to push for such an early trial date was to work to get the case tried before the November election, and the Justice Department Manual clearly forbids Jack Smith from taking any action on that basis.’

She also cited Smith’s petitions with the Supreme Court and used his own comments in court that no American is ‘above the law’ as further argument that he should support an investigation into his conduct.

‘If that is true, then he should be open to, and welcome, an ethics investigation into conduct that, on its face, implicates potential violations of DOJ policy and multiple rules of professional conduct,’ Stefanik said. ‘Biden special counsel Jack Smith’s highly unusual and clearly improper attempts to expedite trial, and his blatant violation of District Court orders, evidence his partisan attempt to influence the results of the 2024 presidential election.’

The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, heard arguments in Trump’s immunity case last week. A final decision is expected in June — with the likelihood of a trial before the presidential election being slim.

Fox News Digital reached out to the DOJ for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Stocks Plunge with Key Earnings on Tap
next post
House Dems say they’ll block Marjorie Taylor Greene from ousting Speaker Johnson

You may also like

Connecticut bill would let 12-year-olds get vaccines without...

January 18, 2023

Trump says he wasn’t ‘trolling’ about acquiring Greenland,...

April 25, 2025

Sen. Kennedy advises ‘wobbly’ Biden to get tough...

April 15, 2024

Border Patrol Rescues Migrant Abandoned By Smugglers Inside...

October 26, 2022

‘Experts’ bashing conservative SCOTUS justices have undisclosed ties...

June 23, 2023

What Happened to Rep. Jim Jordan? What Is...

October 4, 2022

‘What a ripoff!’: Trump sparks backlash after cutting...

February 10, 2025

Harris slams ‘offensive’ Trump remark on protecting women...

October 31, 2024

Assault on conservative groups: 10 things you need...

June 9, 2023

Arizona Mohave County Board of Supervisors to Discuss...

December 8, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Jeremy Hunt ‘made a mistake’ targeting non-doms, says shadow business secretary

      June 27, 2025
    • Small firms raise alarm over Companies House rule change forcing profit disclosure

      June 27, 2025
    • UK vehicle production slumps to lowest May level since 1949 as tariffs bite

      June 27, 2025
    • 420,000 more pensioners dragged into income tax net as threshold freeze bites

      June 27, 2025
    • SMEs cautiously optimistic despite trade fears and AI talent gap, says Vistage

      June 27, 2025
    • Alibaba launches £750,000 pitch competition for UK and European SMEs

      June 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,322)
    • Investing (2,074)
    • Politics (15,824)
    • Stocks (3,172)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved