Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Biden White House rejects ICC sanctions proposed by lawmakers after Israel warrant requests

by May 29, 2024
May 29, 2024
Biden White House rejects ICC sanctions proposed by lawmakers after Israel warrant requests

The White House refused to support proposed sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC) after the international tribunal requested arrest warrants for Israeli officials for alleged ‘war crimes’ as the country fights the terrorist group Hamas in Gaza. 

‘We don’t believe that sanctions against the ICC is the right approach here, no,’ said National Security Council Coordinator John Kirby during a White House press briefing on Tuesday.

He said the Biden administration does not ‘believe the ICC has jurisdiction’ and doesn’t support the arrest warrants requested against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

The ICC requested the warrants alongside similar ones for Hamas’ leaders; the organization accuses both Israeli and Hamas leaders of committing ‘war crimes.’

Despite objecting to the ICC’s move, Kirby said the Biden administration doesn’t think ‘sanctioning the ICC is the answer.’

The White House’s stance on potential sanctions comes as both the House and Senate make policy recommendations to respond to the ICC.

Last week, a bipartisan group led by Sens. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., and Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., advised visa bans for ICC officials and sanctions on the international body. The group included Democrat Sens. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., John Fetterman, D-Penn., and Bob Casey, D-Penn.

The introduced Senate provision also sought to formally reject the actions of the ICC.

In the House, Reps. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and Brian Mast, R-Fla., have introduced a measure that would force the president to implement sanctions against the ICC if the court goes after U.S. allies, such as Israel, which are not in its jurisdiction.

According to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., ‘There are ongoing discussions, as I understand it, between Chairman (Michael) McCaul (R-Texas) and ranking member Gregory Meeks, (D-N.Y.), and the objective is trying to reach bipartisan consensus with respect to the International Criminal Court.’ 

However, with the White House ruling out sanctions, it’s unclear whether any actions will be taken by the U.S. in response to the ICC.

Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
MPs Warn Sunak’s £1bn Rural Mobile Network Plan at Risk Due to Surging Costs
next post
NY v. Trump: Judge Merchan to present jury with instructions ahead of deliberations

You may also like

First on Fox: Leading pro-Trump super PAC hauls...

July 12, 2024

Georgia Capitol beefs up security in anticipation of...

August 15, 2023

Biden admin making moves at border amid looming...

August 9, 2023

WaPo: The Vaccinated Now Account for a Majority...

November 23, 2022

Biden under fire for Middle East policy; critics...

March 6, 2024

Parents tell SCOTUS: LGBTQ storybooks in classrooms clash...

April 22, 2025

AOC admits ‘massive’ scale of Green New Deal,...

April 24, 2023

EXCLUSIVE: Interview with Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai on Social...

November 7, 2022

FBI Accused Of “Cooking The Books” To Reclassify...

December 16, 2022

Zelenskyy not yet signing US economic agreement ‘short-sighted,’...

February 17, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Financial Surveillance Is Expanding—But So Is the Resistance

      May 23, 2025
    • SCOOP: House GOP memo highlights Republican wins in Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      May 23, 2025
    • Don’t Put a Tariff on Barbie: Global Trade Increases the Variety and Lowers the Price of Dolls and Almost All Else We Buy

      May 23, 2025
    • US investor group in talks to buy OnlyFans in deal reportedly worth up to $8bn

      May 23, 2025
    • Major Russia-Ukraine prisoner swap is underway, official says

      May 23, 2025
    • Applying Key Ratios to the Broader Market Surge: Are We at the Threshold of a New Trend?

      May 23, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,036)
    • Investing (1,983)
    • Politics (15,358)
    • Stocks (3,101)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved