Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Iron Law of Prohibition: Nicotine Edition

by May 30, 2024
May 30, 2024
Iron Law of Prohibition: Nicotine Edition

Jeffrey A. Singer

In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) assumed the authority to regulate all nicotine‐​containing products, including electronic nicotine delivery systems, such as e‑cigarettes. E‑cigarette manufacturers were given until September 9, 2020, to submit applications to the FDA for the agency to approve the marketing of their products. The agency received nearly seven million applications by the deadline and is still reviewing many of them. It has rejected more than a million flavored vape applications.

However, non‐​nicotine synthetics that have chemical structures resembling nicotine are exempt from FDA regulation. Thus, people who wish to consume relatively harmless nicotine because they value its stimulative and calming effects can work around government obstructions by accessing nicotine‐​analog products. The government does not require makers of synthetic nicotine analogs to obtain FDA approval before they can market them to consumers. And consumers are purchasing these products.

According to a letter to FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, from Altria LLC, a nicotine product manufacturer that has complied with FDA regulations, several companies, including many in other countries, are marketing nicotine analogs to consumers. The letter states, “The introduction and growth of chemicals intended to imitate the effects of nicotine, if left unchecked, could present unknown risks to U.S. consumers and undermine FDA’s authority,” urging the FDA to “carefully and quickly evaluate these new compounds to determine what regulatory authority it has over these products.”

Now comes a report by the Reuters news agency stating that the FDA and independent researchers believe that many of these analogs, such as 6‑methyl nicotine, might be “more potent and addictive” than nicotine.

This is another example of the “iron law of prohibition”—the harder the law enforcement, the harder the drug—in action. In this case, the government, largely driven by nicotinophobia, is prohibiting the manufacture and sale of numerous nicotine products, many of which have helped smokers quit the habit.

Prohibition resulted in drug trafficking organizations moving from diverted prescription pain pills to heroin, from heroin to fentanyl, from fentanyl to fentanyl mixed with xylazine, and now from that to fentanyl mixed with medetomidine and nitazenes.

Rinse and repeat.

We are now seeing the same process at work with nicotine. Nicotine prohibition begets more potent forms of nicotine, and new opportunities appear to be on the horizon for the prohibition/​law enforcement complex.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
How to Choose the Best Fax App for iPhone: A Comprehensive Guide
next post
New Defending Globalization Content: The Conservative and Progressive Cases for Globalization

You may also like

A Backlash Against First Amendment Standing?

September 11, 2023

What Is the Opportunity Cost of State AI...

June 10, 2025

Corporate Welfare Spending

March 4, 2025

Lawyers Who Anger the Feds Face New Penalties...

March 25, 2025

The Government Can’t Revoke a Visa Because of...

April 30, 2025

China’s Economic System Isn’t ‘Incompatible’ with WTO Rules

December 13, 2023

3.8 Million Middle Eastern or North Africans in...

September 27, 2023

Financial Surveillance Should Be Pared Back, Not Extended...

March 3, 2025

The New Retaliation Tax, Section 899

June 10, 2025

Corporate Transparency Act Compels Americans to Incriminate Themselves

May 28, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Video Surveillance as a Guardian of Safety: Psychological Effects and Engineering Aspects

      July 23, 2025
    • Tech Taps the Brakes, Homebuilders Hit the Gas: See the Rotation on StockCharts Today

      July 22, 2025
    • Obama denies Trump’s ‘bizarre allegations’ that he was Russiagate ‘ringleader’ in rare statement

      July 22, 2025
    • Huckabee hits back at Western countries that ‘side’ with terror group Hamas

      July 22, 2025
    • Jeffrey Epstein case reopens focus on Ghislaine Maxwell as deputy AG steps in

      July 22, 2025
    • Key Features to Look for in a Rechargeable Pod-Style Vape Kit

      July 22, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,549)
    • Investing (2,139)
    • Politics (16,159)
    • Stocks (3,223)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved