Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

NRA v. Vullo: A Big First Amendment Win at the High Court

by May 31, 2024
May 31, 2024
NRA v. Vullo: A Big First Amendment Win at the High Court

Walter Olson

Free‐​expression advocates won a big victory at the Supreme Court in yesterday’s National Rifle Association v. Vullo, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor writing for a unanimous court with Justices Neil Gorsuch and Ketanji Brown Jackson concurring.

Brent Skorup, legal fellow in the Cato Institute’s Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, responded with this statement:

The Supreme Court has been clear that a government official cannot directly or indirectly coerce a private party to punish disfavored speech on the government’s behalf. Today the Court unanimously reaffirmed that principle.

Acting on a tip from gun‐​control advocacy groups, in 2017 New York’s Department of Financial Services began investigating insurance companies who offered insurance products to NRA members. New York regulators and Governor Cuomo, via meetings with and emails, statements, and guidance to those insurers, signaled that the regulators would focus their enforcement and investigations on insurers who continued to provide insurance products to the NRA and similar “gun promotion organizations.” Insurers discontinued services to NRA members and the NRA sued for violation of the organization’s First Amendment rights.

The Supreme Court today reversed the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and held that the NRA plausibly alleged violation of the organization’s free speech rights. New York regulators’ actions were not “examples of permissible government speech” and were not “legitimate enforcement action.” The Court held that the NRA’s allegations, if true, were coercive threats aimed at punishing the NRA’s speech in violation of the First Amendment. The case is remanded for further proceedings. The Court reached the correct result and it’s encouraging to see a unanimous affirmation of an important precedent that the government cannot use its power to indirectly chill the speech of private parties and government critics.

Writing with David Rifkin in the Wall Street Journal in 2022, Cato adjunct scholar Andrew Grossman said that in its earlier decision upholding New York’s actions, the Second US Circuit Court of Appeals had “provided a road map for officials to circumvent the First Amendment’s protection for freedom of speech.” It was that Second Circuit ruling that the high court vacated and remanded yesterday,

In January, Andrew Grossman and I did a Cato Podcast with Caleb Brown previewing the case. On the podcast, The Reload, Cato adjunct scholar Robert Corn‐​Revere examined the stance of the US Justice Department, which weighed in on behalf of a somewhat narrower interpretation of First Amendment protection.

“The amusing part,” I wrote in 2020, “is that the public officials themselves are helping to provide the basis for these rulings by tweeting and speechifying about how much damage they intend to do the NRA.” I cited cases in California in which responsible officials had been even more candid than had been New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo about their motivations. And a Cato briefing paper last October by Andrew Grossman and Kristin Shapiro put the case into context of other efforts by government officials to jawbone or simply coerce private parties into constricting others’ speech.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
New Medicaid Regulations Unlikely to Improve Accessibility and Transparency
next post
Tech Stocks Sell Off, But AI Shines!

You may also like

A “Mess” Compared to What, Mr. Cass?

January 3, 2025

Should the US Respond to “Unfair” Trade Practices?

January 31, 2025

That’s Not How the BRAC Commission Worked: No...

November 28, 2023

Medicaid’s Funding Formula Rewards Overspending and Fuels Fraud

May 20, 2025

Could Policymakers Improve Youth Online Safety Without Running...

December 5, 2024

Why Not Get the Government Out of Vaccine...

June 18, 2025

Maria Corina Machado Has United Venezuelans to Vote...

July 27, 2024

1.8 Million in Employment-Based Green Card Backlog

August 29, 2023

Senate Immigration Deal Is a Mixed Bag

February 6, 2024

The Jones Act’s Role in Encouraging Puerto Rico’s...

May 1, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Don’t Give Big Businesses Immunity from Litigation

      June 27, 2025
    • Unmasking Medicaid Money-Laundering Schemes: Medicaid Financing Gimmicks 101

      June 27, 2025
    • Top moments from the Trump-Biden debate that changed the course of the 2024 election

      June 27, 2025
    • Trump exerted ‘maximum pressure’ on Iran and Israel to ‘deliver peace’: Leavitt

      June 27, 2025
    • Iranian foreign minister reiterates ‘serious damage’ to nuclear facilities, despite ayatollah’s comments

      June 27, 2025
    • Maybe Most People Do Not Want Teacher-Led Public School Prayer—But They Do Want Chaplains

      June 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,329)
    • Investing (2,077)
    • Politics (15,829)
    • Stocks (3,173)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved