Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

California’s Latest Minimum Wage Hike Reaffirms the Destructiveness of Price Controls

by June 5, 2024
June 5, 2024
California’s Latest Minimum Wage Hike Reaffirms the Destructiveness of Price Controls

Michael Chapman

The minimum wage for most fast‐​food workers in California went up to $20 per hour in April. Since then—no surprise—thousands of workers have lost their jobs and menu prices have risen. Coincidentally, a new book by the Cato Institute, The War on Prices, devotes two chapters to the destructive effects of minimum wage laws. Lawmakers in California and nationwide should read it if they really want to enact policies that help people.

The first, an essay by economist Jeffrey Clemens, details how firms adjust to higher mandated wage floors in ways beyond simply cutting jobs. Yes, despite claims to the contrary, the evidence still suggests overall that raising wages by government fiat can result in “substantial job losses, especially for the least‐​skilled, least‐​experienced, and least productive workers,” writes Clemens. But he confirms other ways firms often adapt to higher mandated wage rates to keep their employment costs from rising.

They can trim “fringe benefits,” such as health insurance, paid leave, and pension accounts. They also might forestall improvements or safety upgrades. Or they can sweat workers harder, micromanage their schedules, or substitute inexperienced workers for more experienced staff.

In the second essay, San Diego State University Economics Department Chairman Joseph J. Sabia explains why “minimum wages are an ineffective and inefficient anti‐​poverty tool.” Although poverty reduction has been a stated rationale for increasing minimum wages since FDR’s federal law in 1938, Sabia shows that less than 10 percent of individuals in poverty are minimum wage workers.

Add to this how high wage floors destroy entry‐​level opportunities for “less experienced, less educated, low skilled workers”—i.e. those who are more prone to poverty—and one sees why minimum wages are so ineffective and ill‐​targeted in reducing poverty.

California’s situation affirms some of these pernicious effects.

For instance, raising wage costs has reduced labor demand. The Wall Street Journal reported in March that some restaurants were “already laying off staff and reducing hours for workers as they try to cut costs.” Other businesses said they had “halted hiring” or were “scaling back workers’ hours.”

Round Table Pizza and Pizza Hut, for example, announced they were laying off about 1,280 delivery drivers. This eradicates entry‐​level positions that can give vital experience to young and lower‐​skilled workers and provide protection against poverty. Driver Michael Ojeda, 29 years old, said, “Pizza Hut was my career for nearly a decade and with little to no notice it was taken away.”

At the same time, the fact that the wage control applies to all fast‐​food outlets (with at least 60 locations nationwide) has meant firms have passed through a lot of the elevated costs into higher prices. Even before the wage floor was introduced at $20 per hour, up from $16 per hour, McDonald’s, Chipotle, and Jack in the Box “plan to raise menu prices to compensate for the required wage increase,” reported NBC 7 San Diego in March.

According to consumer reporter John Stossel, “Starbucks prices have increased as much as 15 percent” and “a chicken burrito at Chipotle will cost up to 8 percent more.” To the extent that poor Californians eat fast food, these higher prices reduce their standard of living.

It’s all a reminder that controlling prices doesn’t change the underlying economic pressures in the labor market. Control one price—the hourly wage rate—and other margins adjust. In California’s case, raising the minimum wage means fewer work opportunities for the young and unskilled and higher prices for fast food consumers.

This is more confirmation that, as The War on Prices documents, minimum wage laws only deliver “symbolic hope to the working poor” and “risk leaving many of the nation’s most vulnerable worse off.”

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
‘Like a son’: Former top Biden adviser with deep business ties to China spotted inside Hunter Biden gun trial
next post
Tourist Tax Diverts Wealthy Visitors from London to Paris and Milan, Claims Cadogan Estates Boss

You may also like

Beltway Bandits

October 25, 2024

Election Policy Roundup II

August 1, 2024

David Boaz: Champion of Educational Freedom

June 7, 2024

The New Deal and Recovery, Part 20: The...

August 9, 2022

Senate GOP Deploys Dishonest Budget Gimmick to Dodge...

April 3, 2025

When Hayek Came to Cato

December 1, 2023

Red America Would Suffer Under RFK Jr.

February 13, 2025

Bay Area Transit Agency Experiment with “Low Cost”...

December 18, 2023

A Glimmer of Hope in a Sea of...

February 11, 2025

Friday Feature: Bridges to Science

September 22, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Democrats project doom and gloom, not celebration, with July 4 messages

      July 5, 2025
    • Xi Jinping’s surprise no-show at BRICS Summit fuels speculation about China’s global standing

      July 5, 2025
    • Tesla sees UK sales rebound in June as EV market accelerates

      July 5, 2025
    • Hived raises $42m to roll out electric delivery fleet across southern England

      July 5, 2025
    • Week Ahead: NIFTY Set To Stay In A Defined Range Unless These Levels Are Taken Out; Drags Support Higher

      July 5, 2025
    • “A turning point for education”: James Caan launches bold education reform plan in House of Lords

      July 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,397)
    • Investing (2,102)
    • Politics (15,947)
    • Stocks (3,190)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved